Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > Technical > General Q & A
PSI 8.8 liter / 550ci ??? >

PSI 8.8 liter / 550ci ???

Notices

PSI 8.8 liter / 550ci ???

Thread Tools
 
Old 04-18-2026 | 11:16 AM
  #141  
Registered
Community Builder
5 Year Member
 
Joined: Aug 2019
Posts: 1,224
Likes: 415
From: BC
Default

An example adding to perspective.

A 454 with Peanut Port heads (70s-80s) that are mildly ported out, will make 570HP at around 5600rpm with 2.19 valves. Reliably.

With low...just over 8:1 CR...and a FT hyd cam.

Popular Hotrodding Mag in 2001..had an article on a 350 SBC ZZ4 Short Block...with 195cc AFR Heads. All off the sheld parts build. Made 520HP at 6600rpm.

PP heads have about a 208CC port...avg 13more CCs than the SBC port...but the BBC port longer...and it really comes down to port CSA. It's a high velocity port when drawn with 454 cubes and some rpm....but they can flow a lot of air.
Tartilla is offline  
Reply
Old 04-18-2026 | 12:08 PM
  #142  
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,865
Likes: 793
From: St. Pete Beach, FL
Default

Originally Posted by Tartilla
An example adding to perspective.

A 454 with Peanut Port heads (70s-80s) that are mildly ported out, will make 570HP at around 5600rpm with 2.19 valves. Reliably.

With low...just over 8:1 CR...and a FT hyd cam.

Popular Hotrodding Mag in 2001..had an article on a 350 SBC ZZ4 Short Block...with 195cc AFR Heads. All off the sheld parts build. Made 520HP at 6600rpm.

PP heads have about a 208CC port...avg 13more CCs than the SBC port...but the BBC port longer...and it really comes down to port CSA. It's a high velocity port when drawn with 454 cubes and some rpm....but they can flow a lot of air.
Well I’d certainly expect it to do better than a peanut port 454 with low compression, even with the same size valve. So maybe the potential is higher. I was just using a CFM rule of thumb, but huge cubes and enough cam could beat the estimate.
hogie roll is offline  
Reply
Old 04-19-2026 | 11:56 PM
  #143  
Registered
Community Builder
5 Year Member
 
Joined: Aug 2019
Posts: 1,224
Likes: 415
From: BC
Default

Originally Posted by hogie roll
Well I’d certainly expect it to do better than a peanut port 454 with low compression, even with the same size valve. So maybe the potential is higher. I was just using a CFM rule of thumb, but huge cubes and enough cam could beat the estimate.
I mentioned the PP head 454 specifically because it's a well setup marine engine for no more than 5800rpm. One of the reasons to use a 2.19 int in a PP head...is to fix the GM bore job into the valve throat..destroying any potential to do a proper valve job.

The PSI engines are def an interesting project.

Ported PSI:
[email protected]
[email protected]
Def going to have some potential.
Tartilla is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.