Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > Technical > General Q & A
PSI 8.8 liter / 550ci ??? >

PSI 8.8 liter / 550ci ???

Notices

PSI 8.8 liter / 550ci ???

Thread Tools
 
Old 08-22-2024 | 12:51 PM
  #131  
TomZ's Avatar
Platinum Member
25 Year Member
Platinum Member
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 4,295
Likes: 1,458
From: Virginia Beach
Default

Sounds healthy!
TomZ is offline  
Reply
Old 11-13-2024 | 11:19 PM
  #132  
Registered
 
Joined: Nov 2024
Posts: 1
Likes: 3
Default

Which Holley system were you trying to use? I am good with most of them, heck, I helped with their design years ago. I am not sure how I found this thread, I was researching the difference between the GM 454 and 496 and found this engine. Really intrigued. I have a 1996 Dually that needs help. The 454 is tired. A friend is trying to get me to put a 496 in there along with the cooling system and front accessory drive. Now I see this engine. I would really love to hear how you all feel about this engine and what sets it apart from the 496. I can easily stroke my 454 but the stock heads will be a limiting factor, even if I do some porting on them. This is a tow vehicle, will never see north of 5500. I will stick with EFI and yes, it will be running off a Holley Term X Max so I can control the trans also. While I have HP Tuners and know it, I prefer the Holley system.
m4bgringo is offline  
Reply
Old 11-14-2024 | 09:18 AM
  #133  
Registered
5 Year Member
 
Joined: Dec 2016
Posts: 583
Likes: 363
From: Portland OR
Default

If you are on Facebook there's a group for these engines called 8.8 PSI big block chevy world. That's the best source of info on the 8.8 we have
87MirageIntruder is offline  
Reply
Old 01-21-2025 | 09:32 AM
  #134  
Thread Starter
Registered
 
Joined: Sep 2022
Posts: 172
Likes: 124
From: Dawsonville, GA
Default

Originally Posted by m4bgringo
Which Holley system were you trying to use? I am good with most of them, heck, I helped with their design years ago. I am not sure how I found this thread, I was researching the difference between the GM 454 and 496 and found this engine. Really intrigued. I have a 1996 Dually that needs help. The 454 is tired. A friend is trying to get me to put a 496 in there along with the cooling system and front accessory drive. Now I see this engine. I would really love to hear how you all feel about this engine and what sets it apart from the 496. I can easily stroke my 454 but the stock heads will be a limiting factor, even if I do some porting on them. This is a tow vehicle, will never see north of 5500. I will stick with EFI and yes, it will be running off a Holley Term X Max so I can control the trans also. While I have HP Tuners and know it, I prefer the Holley system.
It was the Holley Terminator EFI system.
The biggest issue I was having was crank and cam sensor syncing.
I eventually put a flying magnet crank trigger on it and it cleaned up quite a bit... but I still preferred a carb setup... so that is now on the engine and is deadnuts reliable.

I still havent gotten the engine into the boat... and am now rethinking my camshaft choice... Im concerned I may have gone too big with the cam and may have water reversion issues with the stock wet exhaust.
I have a brand new 496HO billet cam on the shelf... so I may play it safe and swap-in the smaller HO cam just for peace of mind.
Dragracer_Art is offline  
Reply
Old 01-30-2025 | 09:54 PM
  #135  
Registered
 
Joined: Jan 2025
Posts: 2
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by Dragracer_Art
It was the Holley Terminator EFI system.
The biggest issue I was having was crank and cam sensor syncing.
I eventually put a flying magnet crank trigger on it and it cleaned up quite a bit... but I still preferred a carb setup... so that is now on the engine and is deadnuts reliable.

I still havent gotten the engine into the boat... and am now rethinking my camshaft choice... Im concerned I may have gone too big with the cam and may have water reversion issues with the stock wet exhaust.
I have a brand new 496HO billet cam on the shelf... so I may play it safe and swap-in the smaller HO cam just for peace of mind.

Hey man, found this post via Google, I have an automotive shop in Winder, and am living in Cleveland currently. I see you sold your spare motor off, but if you wouldn't mind private messaging me (I can't send a PM yet, new member) I'd really like to pick your brain a bit if that's OK. I'm interested in building a frankenmotor for my 8.1 dually. Thanks!
kendogg41 is offline  
Reply
Old 01-30-2025 | 10:06 PM
  #136  
Registered
 
Joined: Jan 2025
Posts: 2
Likes: 1
Default

Also, for anybody else - where do you get gaskets for the 8.8?
kendogg41 is offline  
Reply
Old 06-04-2025 | 09:54 AM
  #137  
Registered
 
Joined: Jun 2025
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Default

8.8 fuel rail fit 8.1?
MDFCUSTOMS is offline  
Reply
Old 06-04-2025 | 03:51 PM
  #138  
Registered
5 Year Member
 
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 175
Likes: 50
Default

Originally Posted by MDFCUSTOMS
8.8 fuel rail fit 8.1?
no
Cerberus66 is offline  
Reply
Old 06-04-2025 | 03:51 PM
  #139  
Registered
5 Year Member
 
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 175
Likes: 50
Default

Originally Posted by kendogg41
also, for anybody else - where do you get gaskets for the 8.8?
psi
Cerberus66 is offline  
Reply
Old 04-17-2026 | 05:01 AM
  #140  
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,860
Likes: 793
From: St. Pete Beach, FL
Default




Stock 8.1, ported 8.8 psi head, raylar head.

It’s an LS head design, but it hasn’t been enlarged enough to support high RPMs with 535 cubes. It’s only got a 2.19” valve. There may be potential there, but you’d be wasting lots of time porting cast iron.

Looks like the stock 8.1 could support 570hp, the ported 8.8 665hp, and the raylar up to 700hp.

Not a lot to love here except the price for a used one. There may be a decent cheap combo to be built with a bigger cam in a stock motor, but otherwise normal aftermarket bbc stuff is a lot better. The 8.1 is not siamesed. The 8.8 head doesn’t look like it can handle high lift or big springs with out mods, according to this guy in the video.

If this guys cnc program is reasonable, and the stock PSI pistons can clear enough cam, there’s potentially a decent cam+head stock bottom end combo possible on the 10/1 compression natural gas version. You might need intake porting to match and fuel system changes to work on gas though.

8.1s have a piston that isn’t ideal and a weak rod. Not sure how the PSI compares here.

Last edited by hogie roll; 04-17-2026 at 05:03 AM.
hogie roll is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.