Even single engine cats where the propeller is behind the tunnel sometimes have notched transoms. It is about choosing leverage versus running surface, and the choice will differ depending on how much running surface you need and how much bow lift you need.

E.g. the nineties Norwegian Hydrolift Sportcat 22, a single engine cat based on a modified Chris Hodges (of Cougar fame) design, used a notch depending on engine choice:
1. If rigged with a JohnnyRude V8, it was built without a notch. The additional running surface was beneficial with the heavy engine.
2. If rigged with something lighter, e.g. a Mercury or Yamaha V6, it was built with a notch. The additional running surface was not beneficial with a lighter engine, and the notch gave additional leverage for bow lift.

The notch was created with a removable box in the Sportcat mold.

The notch, like an extension box, provides leverage for the propeller and the weight of the engine and/or drive behind it. This leverage is free. Using a propeller to create the same amount of lift takes energy. That energy could be used for pushing the boat forward, i.e. speed, instead.

Clean water for the propeller obviously does not matter at all in this single engine cat situation.

Even the GenAI did not suggest that it depends on the make of the boat

@Markus;
That's exactly what I'm assuming. And if create a surplus of bow lift with a notched transom, put a clever up at the back, which lifts your stern, and will fly through the air like a TUFF... almost like a catamaran. And in such case notch really help a lot.

Correct?

p.s.
Will never try to do something like this, just curiosity.

Correct.

Except the "stern lifting" cleaver, as far as I understand, does not really lift the stern even if we call it "stern lifting". It is neutral.

Lowered engine height?? If the outboard motor or lower unit is mounted higher wouldn't that raise engine height?? Cant trust AI for everything just yet

"Clean water" is exactly how I was informed by 3 different boat builders: Harry Schoell, Jay Ross, and Pat Haughey. At least that's the case for V-bottoms. It's a "cheap setback box" that works better in NOT smooth water. BUT in smooth water, that's when the "teeter of the totter" comes into play as I described above. Having owned a 26' Sonic, as well as being aboard several others; in which pretty much all of those hulls employ a notched transom, that's exactly the case.

THIS picture is of a NorTech hull, not a Sonic. But I think it tells another strong part of the story, as you can see via the location of the through hull pick-up; and virtually LACK of extension below the bottom of the hull. As soon as that water passes the aft section of the "wetted" hull, the water is going UP, which lends right back into the design purpose of putting the props in "cleaner" and maybe even a bit more "dense" pressured water as it's flowing upward into those drives/props as well.

Source:
https://boattest.com/view-news/6373_...Should-Know%21