nova 1975 repower 400 SMALLBLOCKs
#11
I have notice from playing with 400's in trucks that it seams the steam holes came in diffrent sizes (ie depended on what drill bit was chucked up that day) Seams to me the bigger the better and make shure that all three Gasket Head and Block match. Rag's
#12
Guest
Posts: n/a
i built and run twin 400 sbc. ive got 30 hours on them.port engine is a 1970(060.")over,starboard is 1976(030.").fresh water cooled with a 5"X24"exchangers,they say that salt water will plug up the steam holes. longer connecting rods are not worth the clearence problems (cam/oilpan rail)and balancing.short rods make more low end torque and are less prone to detonation.short track guys prefer them and go 6500rpm or more.head gaskets need to fit perfect and you need to make sure the fire ring is large enough i used felpro marine the stock felpro wouldn't even fit the 030."over 400
#13
I know two people with 408" sbc's. One in a 20' bowrider and 3 in a 30' Magnum and all four work great. The bowrider has slightly worked Vortec heads and the triples have aluminum heads , all drilled for steam holes.The bowrider dynoed at 450 hp and the others with aluminum heads were aboud 490hp.
#14
Registered

Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 4,837
Likes: 94
From: oshawa ontario
Mopower- 450 and 490hp.....wow......very cool......how many hours on these engines?........do they hold up in the long run?
Dirtyplumber- how high do you spin yours??.....what kind of boat/drives....doug
Dirtyplumber- how high do you spin yours??.....what kind of boat/drives....doug
#15
You can get the same power out of a 383 for less money and less problems. Running higher horsepower 400s in a cool water (160 or so) cooling system will cause cracks from the steam holes to the head bolt hole as illustrated below. And NO you shouldn't run them in salt water. These steam holes are true to their name in the fact they run very hot. This will separate the salt from the water and will build up and eventually close off the steam hole altogether. it is very important to run a closed cooling system with these engines. Mainly because the steam hole will boil off the water inside it and once your off the throttle they will cool too fast causing the cracks I mentioned. 400-SBCs are great for sanctioned cu-in drag racing because of the short runs. I wouldn't count on them to last. Besides there is no point in having them when you can have more horsepower and reliability out of a forged cranked big-block.
Roby
Roby
#16
Originally Posted by cdscarab
BBB, Which leaves the carbs, his was leaking fuel through those machine plugs and in conjuction with a restrictive exhaust cooked all 8 stainless exhaust valves, discolored the iron around the valves almost ruining the heads, and even cooked the rockers. Small items, very expensive consequences.
Roby
#17
Originally Posted by Big Block Billy
Very interesting stuff. I really am interested in why the 400 has more reversion.
Roby
#18
Originally Posted by ragtop409
I have notice from playing with 400's in trucks that it seams the steam holes came in diffrent sizes (ie depended on what drill bit was chucked up that day) Seams to me the bigger the better and make shure that all three Gasket Head and Block match. Rag's
Roby
#19
Originally Posted by dirtyplumber
i built and run twin 400 sbc. ive got 30 hours on them.port engine is a 1970(060.")over,starboard is 1976(030.").fresh water cooled with a 5"X24"exchangers,they say that salt water will plug up the steam holes. longer connecting rods are not worth the clearence problems (cam/oilpan rail)and balancing.short rods make more low end torque and are less prone to detonation.short track guys prefer them and go 6500rpm or more.head gaskets need to fit perfect and you need to make sure the fire ring is large enough i used felpro marine the stock felpro wouldn't even fit the 030."over 400
Roby
#20
Hi ! I'm back. I ended up parting the boat out. It seems that it would only be worthwhile if I was going to keep it. I still may do a 400 project. Thanks to all, BBB


