Reversion (again)
#11
Thread Starter
Registered

Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,991
Likes: 13
From: Socialist Republic of Washington State
Originally Posted by CigaretteFirefox
pressure test the exhaust itself.
Good luck.
Good luck.
Did that too. No leaks
Guess what I am looking for is the magical lobe separation (mistakenly referred to as overlap in post #1) that may make a monumental change in the reversion. Maybe one of you has solved this same problem by doing this since I know many have utilized the same factory exhaust location that I did.
As I said, The engine builder said I could not get enough separation to solve this dilemma and need to get the tailpipes up and out of the water.
#13
Registered
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
From: Middle River, Maryland
2112 you should covert to dry exhaust and the cam is a little to big if you want valve spring life and help stop reverision . i would use something around 254 to 258 intkand 260 to 266 at .050 and 112.lsa. I have a race boat with 515ci. engine dry exhaust that exit about 14* above water and the cam is only 242. intk and 248 exh 110 lsa. and you can watch the water trying to revert. the water exits out side the pipe.
food for thought
food for thought
#14
Originally Posted by PatriYacht
If you loosen the connection between the tailpipes and the header pipes water will pour out while the engines are running. With those cam specs, unless you run dry exhaust, I would guess reversion. I had mine welded closed except for two small holes to cool the tips and mufflers and dumped the rest overboard.
#15
Thread Starter
Registered

Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,991
Likes: 13
From: Socialist Republic of Washington State
Originally Posted by mr_velocity
Yup, I did the same.
#18
Registered
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,777
Likes: 12
From: San Diego, California
2112:
Your motors are obviously big block Fords and with those big flow numbers, big valve sizes and and your cam numbers your overlap number is big, which all equates to very slow mixture speeds at idle. Even with low water flow on the system, your exhaust outlet height coupled with the above will be a high reversion canidate even if you widen the LSA 4 or so degrees. The bigport Ford heads are not known for great velocity under these conditions so your motors must be set up for a high 6000rpm + range to need duration numbers like those. You are probably going to have to re-route you exhaust outlets higher, maybe to the corners to stay away from reversion unless you do a moderate size cam change. Those are some nice lookin Fords, What kind of power did they dyno and where is the rev limiter?
Raylar
Your motors are obviously big block Fords and with those big flow numbers, big valve sizes and and your cam numbers your overlap number is big, which all equates to very slow mixture speeds at idle. Even with low water flow on the system, your exhaust outlet height coupled with the above will be a high reversion canidate even if you widen the LSA 4 or so degrees. The bigport Ford heads are not known for great velocity under these conditions so your motors must be set up for a high 6000rpm + range to need duration numbers like those. You are probably going to have to re-route you exhaust outlets higher, maybe to the corners to stay away from reversion unless you do a moderate size cam change. Those are some nice lookin Fords, What kind of power did they dyno and where is the rev limiter?
Raylar
#19
Thread Starter
Registered

Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,991
Likes: 13
From: Socialist Republic of Washington State
Yes I have an oil thermostat That routes the oil through huge teague coolers.
Raylar; The engines were set up for high rpm the make 820 pounds of torque at 5200 and 870 horses at 6600, Runs a single 1250 dominator Rev limiter is set at 7000.
I think with all else, the cam change might not be enough.
Raylar; The engines were set up for high rpm the make 820 pounds of torque at 5200 and 870 horses at 6600, Runs a single 1250 dominator Rev limiter is set at 7000.
I think with all else, the cam change might not be enough.


