Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > Technical > General Q & A
496 HO advice >

496 HO advice

Notices

496 HO advice

Thread Tools
 
Old 01-23-2005, 09:19 PM
  #1  
Registered
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Knoxville, TN
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default 496 HO advice

I have a 27 fountain fever with 496 HO. Would like to get more performance out of the engine. Would also like to not sacrifice reliability and durability. I would like to get an additional 5-10 mph at top end. Any suggestions?
RDatTN is offline  
Old 01-23-2005, 09:26 PM
  #2  
21 and 42 footers
Platinum Member
 
t500hps's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Richmond VA
Posts: 8,183
Received 119 Likes on 61 Posts
Default Re: 496 HO advice

Raylar had a thread/post about a build up of this motor to around 530hp. That would be enough HP to get the speeds you desire. The testing done appears to suit your needs. I'm not familiar with it, but the info in the thread looked promising.....good luck.
t500hps is offline  
Old 01-23-2005, 11:22 PM
  #3  
Registered
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: San Diego, California
Posts: 2,777
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Thumbs up Re: 496 HO advice

We just completed another customers boat as a project boat and had better success than most 496 owners have imagined. The boat was a 28 Ultra cat. Its a big cat with a single 496HO with the boat weight about 5400lbs. The owner GPS'd and timed the boat with two people and 140 gallons of fuel in frtesh water at Lake Havasu, Arizona. The boat tested at 66.4mph to speed at 5100 rpms and took 15 seconds to plane from zero mph with a labbed 24P Bravo 4 blade prop. The BP103 kit was installed by our dealer Absolute Marine in Havasu and the boat was retested with same fuel load, 4 people aboard this time and under same condtions. With a 28P stock Bravo 4 blade the Zero to plane time dropped to 7 seconds and the top speed was 79.8 mph GPS. All of the tested acceleration times of 20 to 40mph and 40 to 60 mph also dropped by over 1/2! Thats 4, yes 4 inches in pitch increase and now the boat hits this speed at 5000rpm not 5100rpm. Awesome horsepower and torque results that prove the 496 motor with Raylar upgrades will make the "HP525 blue motor" hard to justify! The motor was stock with just our kit. No ECM modifications! and with the stock Mercury exhaust with just our trick modification to the Mercury exhaust manifolds and our fuel pressure increase mod. Our BP103 kit consists of our "BigPower" aluminum cylinder heads with Cometic head gaskets, ARP head bolts and our special stainless steel roller rockers, our new "CoolGap" intake manifold and our new special profile camshaft. This is no fluke or smoke and mirrors. About two and one half years of serious research and development and a lot of investment has gone into making our parts and kits some of the best made and performing engine parts and systems in the industry. A lot of 496 owners have already ordered our parts and many are installing them now. A lot of new Raylar 496's will be going quicker this year all over the country. If anyone needs addtional information or wants to speak to the owner of this boat above, call me toll free M-F 8am to 5PM Pacific time @ (866) 496-8181 or by email at [email protected].
Ray @ Raylar
Raylar is offline  
Old 01-24-2005, 07:14 PM
  #4  
Registered
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Knoxville, TN
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: 496 HO advice

Ray:

appreciate the advice. Can you make any comments about reliability and durability and cost vs. other options?

Thanks

Russell
RDatTN is offline  
Old 01-24-2005, 10:39 PM
  #5  
Registered
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: San Diego, California
Posts: 2,777
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Cool Re: 496 HO advice aqnd Raylar durability

As for reliability, remember, our kit consists of parts that are better engineered,manufactured , stronger and more precise than the factory parts they replace. Only time will ultimatly tell, but if our dyno, in the water and on the road testing for almost 1 1/2 years is any indicator , reliability and dependability will never be any kind of issue. Unlike supercharging, our kits do not stress the factory cast pistons and the cooler running aluminum heads and manifold actualy take heat loading off the motor and eliminate detonation while still using the same octane requirements for fuel. Power and efficiency do not have to stress engines and if properly applied can actually increase engine life. The current stock 496 marine engine tends to run to rich as sold and this will actually shorten ring life over the long run. The days of killer valve springs, out of tune carburators. lopey idles, reversion and short engine life are now being eliminated in many engines due to electronics and material and system improvements. The fresh water cooling of the 496 will be a huge factor in increased engine life due to even and constant operating temperatures. Todays drives should probably more of a reliability concern than the 496 and Raylar upgrades should be.

Just my opinion,
Ray @ Raylar
Raylar is offline  
Old 01-25-2005, 10:41 AM
  #6  
Registered
iTrader: (4)
 
Nordicflame's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Layton, Utah
Posts: 1,546
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default Re: 496 HO advice

Jim,
Are you going to be testing any single or twin V hulls soon? That cat seems like it was right on the fence as far as lifting goes resulting the great gain. I would think a 100 hp increase would realistically net 6-7 mph.
Keep up the good work! Sounds great.
Dave
Nordicflame is offline  
Old 01-25-2005, 08:59 PM
  #7  
Gold Member
Gold Member
 
Hydrocruiser's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 5,762
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Arrow Re: 496 HO advice

If I had a 496 the first thing to go are the cast iron heads; I would leave the cam alone and probably change the intake manifold over to aluminum as well and then put a good set of headers on it and call it a day. Should be good for 75 HP. I don't feel comfortable putting a blower on the stock engine wheras I would be with a 502. I would shoot for durability and a modest increase in HP and torque.

just my usual .02
Hydrocruiser is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
TeamPSI
General Q & A
23
12-10-2007 05:23 PM
ghittner
General Q & A
14
01-12-2006 11:11 AM
RDatTN
Fountain
9
03-06-2005 09:17 AM
bn
General Q & A
4
01-15-2005 07:40 AM
NVRENOUGH
General Q & A
3
02-18-2002 12:25 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Quick Reply: 496 HO advice


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.