Help to identify
#12
Bud,
I think that John said it was a it was 1968 Hull, , if I am not mistaken the hull/transom numbers (HIN #) didn't start to around 1973 or 1974
My 1973 Sport did not have a hull number (HIN#) on the Transom , it was marked under the dash module in black magic marker.
I could be wrong?
Thank you
jim
I think that John said it was a it was 1968 Hull, , if I am not mistaken the hull/transom numbers (HIN #) didn't start to around 1973 or 1974
My 1973 Sport did not have a hull number (HIN#) on the Transom , it was marked under the dash module in black magic marker.
I could be wrong?
Thank you
jim
#13
Hey Mark abit off topic here, but i'm glad you posted some pictures of Subluxator with it's V windshield.........I have the same deck on my sport but without the original windshield.
Most V deck 27 sports i've seen look out of proportion with the high windshield, but Subluxator looks more in proportion.....is that a stock windshield?........Haven't decided on a windscreen yet, but Subluxator (with it's light colored hullside) carry's that windshield pretty nice!
Most V deck 27 sports i've seen look out of proportion with the high windshield, but Subluxator looks more in proportion.....is that a stock windshield?........Haven't decided on a windscreen yet, but Subluxator (with it's light colored hullside) carry's that windshield pretty nice!
Last edited by scippy; 02-22-2014 at 01:14 PM.
#14
Registered
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 455
Likes: 0
From: Bedford & Wolfeboro, NH
Scippy,
That windshield looks identical to the one I removed from Time Flies. I still owe you the templates of what I built for my boat..... Just found them today, please send me your address again.
Direct email is best.... [email protected]
That windshield looks identical to the one I removed from Time Flies. I still owe you the templates of what I built for my boat..... Just found them today, please send me your address again.
Direct email is best.... [email protected]
#15
Hey Mark abit off topic here, but i'm glad you posted some pictures of Subluxator with it's V windshield.........I have the same deck on my sport but without the original windshield.
Most V deck 27 sports i've seen look out of proportion with the high windshield, but Subluxator looks more in proportion.....is that a stock windshield?........Haven't decided on a windscreen yet, but Subluxator (with it's light colored hullside) carry's that windshield pretty nice!
Most V deck 27 sports i've seen look out of proportion with the high windshield, but Subluxator looks more in proportion.....is that a stock windshield?........Haven't decided on a windscreen yet, but Subluxator (with it's light colored hullside) carry's that windshield pretty nice!
#16
Registered
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 455
Likes: 0
From: Bedford & Wolfeboro, NH
The boat with the bow rail has a flat screen windshield, looks to be mounted where a Sport windscreen is installed, so the side panels are shorter with steeper angles . . . Top edge of that had to be "in your face" . This flat screen was usually used on some sedans . ..
#17
Mario.....I didn't noticed that before in regards to the sport with the large flate windshield....I assumed it to be a V deck now it makes sense why height and angle are extreme.
Mark.....For my taste, LI'L SMIDGIN has a suitable lower lifeline with the windshield a tad too high .....Grashopper has (or seems to be) a lower windsheild, but the lifeline is too tall.
I guess functionality comes into place here on lifeline height or was there a tech height to meet on racing?
As for the 2 different deck types offered by Magnum?........I know the V deck sport was offered early (like Mario's and also Mark mentioned Emerald city "Subulaxator") why the choice?
i've never heard the conversation mentioned why Magnum sold 2 different deck type 27 sports...was it function or just styling?........just curious to the marketing difference if any.
Mark.....For my taste, LI'L SMIDGIN has a suitable lower lifeline with the windshield a tad too high .....Grashopper has (or seems to be) a lower windsheild, but the lifeline is too tall.
I guess functionality comes into place here on lifeline height or was there a tech height to meet on racing?
As for the 2 different deck types offered by Magnum?........I know the V deck sport was offered early (like Mario's and also Mark mentioned Emerald city "Subulaxator") why the choice?
i've never heard the conversation mentioned why Magnum sold 2 different deck type 27 sports...was it function or just styling?........just curious to the marketing difference if any.
#18
Registered
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 455
Likes: 0
From: Bedford & Wolfeboro, NH
Scippy,
I'd venture this was driven by simple cost availability of windshields from outside manufacturers. I figure this was an easy way to increase market share / sales as a family boat. The Vee Magnum 27 was merely a deck overlay, a small separate piece ahead of the stock Sport windscreen. Back then 50 mph in your face was kind of not accepted . . sunglasses would get sucked off your face, and in the 27 we're all way above deck and exposed . .
fed up with snow and cold!
I'd venture this was driven by simple cost availability of windshields from outside manufacturers. I figure this was an easy way to increase market share / sales as a family boat. The Vee Magnum 27 was merely a deck overlay, a small separate piece ahead of the stock Sport windscreen. Back then 50 mph in your face was kind of not accepted . . sunglasses would get sucked off your face, and in the 27 we're all way above deck and exposed . .
fed up with snow and cold!
Last edited by Mario L.; 02-23-2014 at 03:18 PM.
#19
Registered
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 352
Likes: 3
From: LI, NY
I don't know, but my guess would be the v windshield was a factory option, I don't think there were many made compared to the total number of sports. (maybe 10-15%) I think they are pretty cool looking but wouldn't want one that tall for myself. I do get blasted in my boat though...





