sick engine room explosion- HD Miss GEICO onboard
#66
SORE MEMBER
Platinum Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: 29°50'49.74"N 95° 5'17.55"W.......TEXAS
Posts: 6,989
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Maybe mounting the engine and transmission in the same precision cradle and couple them with something like these high speed, high torque couplers http://www.lovejoy-inc.com/configurator/index.html enter 2000hp at 7000 rpm for product they allow for up to 1.5 degrees of deflexion
Seems like the u-joints are always the weak point.
Seems like the u-joints are always the weak point.
Last edited by Wobble; 04-15-2014 at 11:17 AM.
#70
Registered
Gold Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: N37 27 29.64 / W117 41 38.88
Posts: 181
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Without looking at the failed part, there is no way to determine WHY the part failed. It doesn't matter how thick or strong you make the part, it the part is made with a microscopic crack in it, it will fail prematurely. One failed, but not the other, so why? Does the other show signs that would give you an indication of why this one failed? I'd want to do a UV inspection for all the signs of fatigue/failure.
As to the shroud, Carbon Fiber is incredibly strong, but may not be the right material. When we cover turbine blades (20-40,000 rpm for a fan) we use kevlar, not CF. Ballistics vests are Kevlar/Aramid, not CF. CF is great for structural items, but not explosive containment.
As to the shroud, Carbon Fiber is incredibly strong, but may not be the right material. When we cover turbine blades (20-40,000 rpm for a fan) we use kevlar, not CF. Ballistics vests are Kevlar/Aramid, not CF. CF is great for structural items, but not explosive containment.