Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > Owners Forum > Nordic
question on imco 3 inch shorty >

question on imco 3 inch shorty

Notices

question on imco 3 inch shorty

Thread Tools
 
Old 08-09-2011 | 11:37 AM
  #11  
Steve Zuckerman's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 2,621
Likes: 1
From: Nashvegas, TN
Default

So there you have it guys, a -2" shorty lower unit seems to be the ticket on the 1999 and earlier pad vee Heats.
Keep us posted with your progress.
We are working on Mayor McCheese's (aka Butch Fletcher) Heat's engine now.
We'll let you know how it goes.
Regards,
Steve
Steve Zuckerman is offline  
Reply
Old 08-09-2011 | 04:16 PM
  #12  
Registered
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
From: Columbiana, Ohio
Default

Originally Posted by Steve Zuckerman
So there you have it guys, a -2" shorty lower unit seems to be the ticket on the 1999 and earlier pad vee Heats.
Keep us posted with your progress.
We are working on Mayor McCheese's (aka Butch Fletcher) Heat's engine now.
We'll let you know how it goes.
Regards,
Steve
I would be interested in knowing the improvement in the MPH. Better handling is great, but picking up a couple MPH makes the investment that much sweeter.
Still Crazy is offline  
Reply
Old 08-09-2011 | 09:45 PM
  #13  
Steve Zuckerman's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 2,621
Likes: 1
From: Nashvegas, TN
Default

Originally Posted by Still Crazy
I would be interested in knowing the improvement in the MPH. Better handling is great, but picking up a couple MPH makes the investment that much sweeter.
I hear you, but there are variables............
That's going to depend on on your horsepower and current speed. With a stock motor, I don't think it's a cost effective mod. Most of the 502 MAG motors and boats are running 65ish, and they seem to have good lift and acelleration.
The factory set them up properly for the HP and propeller technology that was common then.
With a 550+ motor, it should help. It's like a nose cone. If your not running 80+, there's no need to fool with it, because the stock lower is fine to that speed. However, it does become more efficient, the faster you go. The same with a shorty. In other words at 65, don't bother. At 75, maybe, depends on how the boat is handling. Porpoising is a symptom, as is chine walking. At 80+, yes..........
We have messed with Butch's motor so much I can't really give you a back to back (stock lower to IMCO -2" lower) comparison on MPH. As far as handling goes, the porpoising is pretty much gone, it doesn't chine walk over 80, planes off like it did with the stock lower, and still has good lift.
BTW, that's with stock cable power steering. With full or partial hydraulic, it would be even better.
Maybe one of the guys on this thread can tell you how theirs compared on MPH.
Regards,
Steve

Last edited by Steve Zuckerman; 08-10-2011 at 12:48 PM.
Steve Zuckerman is offline  
Reply
Old 08-10-2011 | 12:37 PM
  #14  
Registered
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
From: ontario canada
Default

I am still messing around with different props and stuff with my shorty It really helps with the porpoising and such.I have yet to see a good gain with the merc shorty but it got hot and humid as soon as i put the shorty on.Powerquest is my brother in law we both have older non step pad bottom heats, and we both have shorty's
villain slv is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.