3 years are up
#111
The next thing to ask is...how many single engine Class 4 boats raced the entire 2008 season...and could they have won the High Points Championship if they made all the races....like Laveycraft and Team Actane
Last edited by MANITIE; 12-01-2008 at 05:05 PM.
#112
There has been some talk of running the 525 twin v's in a spec format. My only concern here is it will leave a big hole in class 2. Maybe it is worth looking at moving class 3 up and creating a class for the single V's that want spec racing, Class 3 could be called class 2 with the same speed bracket of 95. Class 3 would then be Spec single V.
Food for thought.
Food for thought.
#113
#115
Registered
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 165
Likes: 0
Gino, I agee with you on not shaving boat count that already exists,but I think that if a class was around for some sort of p-1 style maybe hp x lbs or gear ratio x prop pitch that you could draw sevral SVL'S and some really fast old f-1 boats off their trailers. Many racers out there would jump at the chance to pitch the garman's and really hold it down !!! I'm not trying to cause trouble but if enough people would chime in ,I would love to put something together ''EARS WIDE OPEN"
#117
How about a stepped hull class and a non stepped hull class. We run an old Cig that needs lots of power to keep up with the newer stepped hull's running 525's. Both our speeds are the same but we need lots more power to do that.
Personally I like the classes the way they are. Splitting them is going to be hard to keep track over who is racing who. Also think of the site orginizers, now you will have to have many more starts, or even more days to run. Change can be good or bad. Sounds like maybe the racers need to all get together and make a vote.
I would love to see 50-75 boats at ever site and one large org in charge be it OPA, OSS or SBI. I feel speed is the best way to keep it equal.
But I'm still a newbie and don't know much.....................so be gentle on me.
Personally I like the classes the way they are. Splitting them is going to be hard to keep track over who is racing who. Also think of the site orginizers, now you will have to have many more starts, or even more days to run. Change can be good or bad. Sounds like maybe the racers need to all get together and make a vote.
I would love to see 50-75 boats at ever site and one large org in charge be it OPA, OSS or SBI. I feel speed is the best way to keep it equal.
But I'm still a newbie and don't know much.....................so be gentle on me.
#118
why are their 2 pages of class/rule changes for class 4 and not one person from the class is commenting on their being a problem? What teams would be coming out if changes are to be made?
__________________
"If Things Seem Under Control, You're Not Going Fast Enough"
Mario Andretti
"If Things Seem Under Control, You're Not Going Fast Enough"
Mario Andretti
#120
I made a comment about Class 4...We would have come to mere races if we didn't have to compete against a 42', 38', 35'and so on...ALL twins...We are only 27' (26' really) Activator with a canopy. We were not competitive in OSS SVL because of our hull and set-up, but we can be at 85 mph in class 4. BUT, against the larger boats, we have to run the chit out of our equipment to just keep up! Rough water is pretty rough in a 26' boat...canopy or not. Keep talking, we might be interested in trying again next year...I'm sure Randy can get a few more of the Vee-Lites to race here as well!! Don't forget, there are some less then 32' singles kicking around that might make it back to the water...You never know.
Dave
Dave
__________________
Air, Sea, and Land...Exploring the planet in 3-D!
Air, Sea, and Land...Exploring the planet in 3-D!



