Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > Owners Forum > Pantera
setting X drive height (#6 to Bravo conversion) >

setting X drive height (#6 to Bravo conversion)

Notices

setting X drive height (#6 to Bravo conversion)

Thread Tools
 
Old 06-20-2003 | 01:24 PM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Registered
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
From: Mullica Hill, NJ
Default setting X drive height (#6 to Bravo conversion)

Hi Jo and fellow Pantera owners!

I've posted this in the technical forums and thougth a duplicate post here might work too. I'm re-rigging a Pantera and struggling a little as to where the drives heights should be.

I've read many posts on setting X dimension, but still having a hard time figuring out what to do for my specific application.

I'm planning on installing bravo drives(lwp) on my Pantera that was originally rigged with #6's. The engines are staggered and jack shafts will be used to connect to both drives. I'm planning on having an extension box made that will adapt the bravo to the #6 cutout on the transom.
The transom angle is 13.4 degree and the transom has a 10" deep notch on the bottom. The attached picture shows the current cutout for the #6 and the drives are on 18.5" centers.
Also the height of the notch at each drive center line is 7".

Now.... how would I determine the proper X dimension?

I'm sure I need to take into account the transom notch, but how does that affect it. I've also read that for each 12" the drives are set back the drive height can go up 1". Does the notch transom enable the extension box to be shorter in depth (ie. 6" vs 12")?
I can have the box fab'd to any depth as well as have it layout with a "neutral" setback if needed.

Anybody else ever go thru a conversion like this?
Lou
Attached Thumbnails setting X drive height (#6 to Bravo conversion)-transom.jpg  
pantera38 is offline  
Reply
Old 06-20-2003 | 01:47 PM
  #2  
Von Bongo's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,904
Likes: 1
From: Iowa - Missouri
Default

Looks heavy, you sure you want bravos on that thing?
Von Bongo is offline  
Reply
Old 06-20-2003 | 02:53 PM
  #3  
Thread Starter
Registered
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
From: Mullica Hill, NJ
Default

I really have no other options that fit into the budget at this point.
pantera38 is offline  
Reply
Old 06-21-2003 | 01:06 PM
  #4  
JO - PANTERABOATS's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,804
Likes: 4
From: Miami,FL. USA
Default

Hey Pantera 38,

I will try calling you on Monday and talk to you about this set up.

Regards,

JO
JO - PANTERABOATS is offline  
Reply
Old 06-23-2003 | 10:28 PM
  #5  
IRONMAN's Avatar
Charter Member
20 Year Member
Charter Member
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,237
Likes: 2
From: south east of dome island
Default

The Bravos should have more reach than the #6 but will be closer to the transom as far as the prop location. I am not sure how much the #6 is shorter than the bravo. Jo will know or Mindi at dollar marine or Marc at BAM will know. If you are mounting them on boxes than you will want the propshafts close to the same depth as the #6's , if no boxes or setback than try the shafts about 2 - 3" deeper than the orig. #6 good luck, The Ironman.
IRONMAN is offline  
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Young Performance
General Boating Discussion
55
07-20-2008 12:58 AM
z.zuperboat
Superboat
2
02-19-2006 01:29 PM
baja27
General Boating Discussion
2
01-05-2005 04:31 PM
pantera38
General Q & A
14
06-23-2003 11:32 PM
wilgie
Formula
2
05-20-2002 05:25 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.