![]() |
if theres nothing to move in the boat to correct the cg, and it is way to far back, what is the next best option??? leave it or ad weight in the bow???
|
Originally Posted by 302Sport
(Post 3386005)
if theres nothing to move in the boat to correct the cg, and it is way to far back, what is the next best option??? leave it or ad weight in the bow???
|
Originally Posted by Steve 1
(Post 3386011)
Bow tank,but you pay the price as every gram takes power to move it.
|
Originally Posted by baha boat freak
(Post 3377302)
hey can you please tell me what speeds this boat was doing max. and wat would a 25 sports deck do with twin 2.5 260/280's or twin 300xs promax wat will yhe speeds be thanks. i have one and want to rigg it to reach great speeds to race in and just to be a fun beach day boat, and whats the fastes this hull can go? and with >? thanks!
|
|
Originally Posted by Steve 1
(Post 3386011)
Bow tank,but you pay the price as every gram takes power to move it.
ND1 |
how much does shifting the motors effect a 33ft v bottom????? for instance shifting motors 1 inch equals how many inches of COG change???????
|
(weight x distance)/deadweight....i think. havent done any stability in a few months
|
What's that formula giving you???
|
the moment. shows how far it moves. if you also must raise the motor a little, that messes with VGC ( vertical center of gravity). use the same formula
|
Steve
Do you know how much a 33 newer style with twin big blocks weight with fuel? Thanks |
deadweight would be hull without the power correct???
|
and is it distance moved or distance from COG
|
Originally Posted by 302Sport
(Post 3395599)
how much does shifting the motors effect a 33ft v bottom????? for instance shifting motors 1 inch equals how many inches of COG change???????
1) The boat AU weight was say 8,000 pounds; 2) The combined weight of your engines (only) was say 2000lbs; then movement of your engines 1 inch forward would move the lcg about a quarter of an inch. If you moved them a foot forward your lcg would move about 3 inches forward. However if: 1) Your current Lcg was say 11 feet from the transom; and 2) The combined engine center of mass was 5 feet from the transom; -then 100lbs of additional ballast 30 feet from the transom would have roughly the same effect as moving your engines a foot forward. However as Steve mentioned that’s 100 lbs you don’t need to be carrying around and of course from a dynamic stability perspective this extra mass is also generating a moment of inertia of roughly 35,000 ft/lbs. The large mass of the engines is generating a moment of inertia of only 72,000 ft/lbs due to their proximity to the overall craft lcg so you can see how only 100lbs of ballast right at the bow can generate almost half the moment of inertia of 2000 lbs worth of engines somewhat proximate to the lcg. That’s why you want to keep the bow light and shift your engines to optimize lcg position. This is yet another reason why you see rough water V-hulled race boats with staggered engines-provided of course they have steps…but that’s another conversation for another day… ND1 |
i got ya.....
|
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metacentric_height
there ya go |
Originally Posted by sixmassive
(Post 3396830)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metacentric_height
there ya go Sixmassive -you’re barking up the wrong tree here. Metacentres are generally utilized for stability calcs in the lateral domain (roll stability). 302sports’ issue is not in this “transverse” domain but rather the longitudinal domain –where vcg’s are not the dominant variable or concern. ND1 |
NDI
Can you elaborate on why the v's would have to have steps? ][/QUOTE]This is yet another reason why you see rough water V-hulled race boats with staggered engines-provided of course they have steps…[QUOTE Thanks, great info on CG -- the term is thrown around all the time -- now it means a litlle more... |
i was just giving him something to go on. i know the differnce between longitudinal and transverse stability as i deal with it everyday. Although i havent had to long hand it in a while.
I guess thats what i get for not reading the wikipedia page haha. |
Originally Posted by delsol
(Post 3397260)
NDI
Can you elaborate on why the v's would have to have steps? ] Thanks, great info on CG -- the term is thrown around all the time -- now it means a litlle more...[/QUOTE] For sure, However as I don’t want to hijack Steve’s excellent and informative thread, I’ll start a new dedicated stepped hull thread. A huge amount of misinformation has been disseminated on this subject over the years hence this is probably the occasion to offer a new perspective. I’ll have time later this week to get this thread started -so if you could give me a few days that would be great. Thanks, ND1 |
1 Attachment(s)
Just spent portions of this week going through this whole thread. WOW- what greathistory on a great boat! Even saw a picture of my Dad's old 30' Shadow cat, Black Duck.
|
Originally Posted by Steve 1
(Post 3114189)
|
hows that run with v-rods?
|
surely 60+
|
|
[YOUTUBE]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O2tVzvRJ11o[/YOUTUBE]
|
How's my 39 PP coming:party-smiley-004:
|
Wow what an awesome place to boat.
|
More Please! Steve 1, anymore lay up pictures? Thanks!
|
Build them with some modern technology and updated decks and dash's, and interiors....and they will come..
actually just build them the way they were..and I bet it would be successful...again..All it takes is coin..:grinser010: |
Originally Posted by Jassman
(Post 3465013)
Build them with some modern technology and updated decks and dash's, and interiors....and they will come..
I think boats and paint jobs in general have become too "fru fru" and could come back to some simpler designs but what do I know, probably wouldn't sell many. |
Originally Posted by Indy
(Post 3465037)
I wouldn't change much. The thing that drew me to PP in the first place was that So. FL hard core offshore look.
I think boats and paint jobs in general have become too "fru fru" and could come back to some simpler designs but what do I know, probably wouldn't sell many. |
Originally Posted by Indy
(Post 3465037)
I wouldn't change much. The thing that drew me to PP in the first place was that So. FL hard core offshore look.
I think boats and paint jobs in general have become too "fru fru" and could come back to some simpler designs but what do I know, probably wouldn't sell many. |
+3
|
Originally Posted by Indy
(Post 3465037)
I wouldn't change much. The thing that drew me to PP in the first place was that So. FL hard core offshore look.
I think boats and paint jobs in general have become too "fru fru" and could come back to some simpler designs but what do I know, probably wouldn't sell many. |
Originally Posted by WesSmith
(Post 3465138)
+3....My Powerplay was one of the best boats I've ever owned.
And yeah...those PPs are sweet, the perfect hull for LIS and the East End. |
mine eats that slop right up in the sound
|
Originally Posted by Indy
(Post 3465169)
Hi Wes! Still have your Apache? We're boatless, until things improve around here I'll be living vicariously through OSO to get my fix.
And yeah...those PPs are sweet, the perfect hull for LIS and the East End. Apache went to the midwest almost three years ago ! For Sale again I understand.... Now that all three kids are out of college, maybe boating is in the cards again ! Call me sometime...... |
Originally Posted by Indy
(Post 3465037)
I wouldn't change much. The thing that drew me to PP in the first place was that So. FL hard core offshore look.
I think boats and paint jobs in general have become too "fru fru" and could come back to some simpler designs but what do I know, probably wouldn't sell many. |
Originally Posted by JMS322
(Post 3465307)
+4. We LOVE ours. Personally I'd leave the "Old School" look. Although I love my big cid power......"New School" power is pretty cool.
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:27 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.