Bravo "Style" Props
#21
Registered

Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 4,817
Likes: 373
From: IL
I have owned one Hill propeller. It was a custom 4-blade Hoss-style. You could see the differences between the blades with your own eyes.
Over the years, I have used propellers from Mercury (non-Lab and Lab), OMC, Yamaha, Dewald, Spinelli Brothers, Mazco and many others.
Hill is known for inconsistency. If you don't trust me, just Google.
Over the years, I have used propellers from Mercury (non-Lab and Lab), OMC, Yamaha, Dewald, Spinelli Brothers, Mazco and many others.
Hill is known for inconsistency. If you don't trust me, just Google.
mercs props are no different , the variance in the blades are just as bad or maybe worst, the only way you will get them perfect is by labing.
as explained on the below video at the 40 second mark
Last edited by boatnt; 02-22-2025 at 03:43 PM.
#22
Registered

Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 4,817
Likes: 373
From: IL
BoatNT,
Following the convo where it leads, with interest toward why I started it....
You've got experience, specifically with the PQ 280... How do the 5 blades do? Ever tried any Hydromotives? Tom @ Hydromotive is suggesting a P5X. Not sure I want to go the 5 blade route, but it's been suggested by a couple people now....
Otherwise... Bow-lifting, transom-lifting or neurtral? Which does the 280 like? Bravo props generally considered which?
Thanks. Brad.
Following the convo where it leads, with interest toward why I started it....
You've got experience, specifically with the PQ 280... How do the 5 blades do? Ever tried any Hydromotives? Tom @ Hydromotive is suggesting a P5X. Not sure I want to go the 5 blade route, but it's been suggested by a couple people now....
Otherwise... Bow-lifting, transom-lifting or neurtral? Which does the 280 like? Bravo props generally considered which?
Thanks. Brad.
My understanding the Hydromotives perform better on straight bottom V hulls,
For the most part all the older straight bottom Fountains came from the factory with Hydromotives, but once Fountain went to step bottoms they switched to Bravo 1s
#23
Registered

Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 3,775
Likes: 638
From: Lakewood, NY, USA
They switched to Bravo props because Reggie owed Mercury and they put the pressure on. Or so I have been told.
Hydromotive has two five blade props. If I remember correctly the X model is bow lifting.
Padraig
Hydromotive has two five blade props. If I remember correctly the X model is bow lifting.
Padraig
Last edited by Padraig; 02-22-2025 at 04:18 PM.
#24
Registered

Joined: Jan 2021
Posts: 902
Likes: 408
From: Gothenburg, Sweden
I remember a thread in some discussion forum some 20 years ago where Ron Hill described winning a race in his youth with a propeller with varying blades. Ron was no believer in precision.
#25
Registered

Joined: Apr 2016
Posts: 205
Likes: 45
Again, Hill is less consistent than most, and this is well known, at least among us outboard folks.
I remember a thread in some discussion forum some 20 years ago where Ron Hill described winning a race in his youth with a propeller with varying blades. Ron was no believer in precision.
I remember a thread in some discussion forum some 20 years ago where Ron Hill described winning a race in his youth with a propeller with varying blades. Ron was no believer in precision.
More slip you have less important it is consistency, less slip you have more important it is.
CNC clever for 20% slip is an unnecessary investment, but for 5% it is a necessity.
For 15+% slip it is probably Signature as good as any super matched prop with same shape.
#26
Registered

Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 4,817
Likes: 373
From: IL
he told me to stick with Bravo 1 props,
he said the reason they switched to bravos was because of the step bottom and the bravo simply grip the water better
Last edited by boatnt; 02-23-2025 at 06:07 AM.
#27
Registered

Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 4,817
Likes: 373
From: IL
Again, Hill is less consistent than most, and this is well known, at least among us outboard folks.
I remember a thread in some discussion forum some 20 years ago where Ron Hill described winning a race in his youth with a propeller with varying blades. Ron was no believer in precision.
I remember a thread in some discussion forum some 20 years ago where Ron Hill described winning a race in his youth with a propeller with varying blades. Ron was no believer in precision.
Is it possible that chad has a different philosophy? Lol
#28
Registered

Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 4,817
Likes: 373
From: IL
I have in the past send my props to him, and I can't say I noticed much of a difference after I got them back, but he is supposed to be the outboard prop guru
safe to say you won't be ordering Hill marine props anytime soon,LOL
Last edited by boatnt; 02-23-2025 at 06:06 AM.
#29
Registered

Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 7,296
Likes: 1,804
From: Merritt Island, FL
that's what I thought but apparently not true. About 10 years ago. I caught up with Reggie down to Key West during the races and he was kind enough to have a lengthy conversation with me and that was one of the things that we talked about as i asked his opinion because I was looking for better propellers for my boat because I thought my slip numbers were hi,
he told me to stick with Bravo 1 props,
he said the reason they switched to bravos was because of the step bottom and the bravo simply grip the water better
he told me to stick with Bravo 1 props,
he said the reason they switched to bravos was because of the step bottom and the bravo simply grip the water better
Interesting because a lot of the step boats came with Hydromotives, The first time I started seeing Bravo's were on the side by side twin step 35's. They also were spinning out rather than in.
Maybe I should try bravo's again but in the past they did seem better in the mid range but pretty much made the boat want to propose and lost 2-3 top end. Mine is a single step.
#30
Registered

Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 4,817
Likes: 373
From: IL
Interesting because a lot of the step boats came with Hydromotives, The first time I started seeing Bravo's were on the side by side twin step 35's. They also were spinning out rather than in.
Maybe I should try bravo's again but in the past they did seem better in the mid range but pretty much made the boat want to propose and lost 2-3 top end. Mine is a single step.
Maybe I should try bravo's again but in the past they did seem better in the mid range but pretty much made the boat want to propose and lost 2-3 top end. Mine is a single step.


