Formula 242 with high x-Dim.
#11
Registered

Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 690
Likes: 177
From: Finland
My friends 242 502ho, worked The best with REVOLUTION 4. My single 26ft stinger loves it also, was The best with Old 500hp 502cid /high x, 4.7" Below, now with 670hp /3.7" Below IT is also The best prop. Have tried few bravos and those sucks big Time, worst of all tested props.
#12
Registered

Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 14,177
Likes: 3,731
From: On A Dirt Floor
I would have to measure where it actually is. this boat is full V.
I tried 24 pitch bravo1 yesterday, it only went 45 Mph @ 4000rpm.
Then i tried Mirage 23, went 45Mph @ 4100 Rpm
I can trim them up to 4800 Rpm and massive Rooster tail but she never gets faster.
With the 24 Bravo1 i had a feeling the bow was mor up as with revolution and mirage.
Rpms are too low i think. I could try now bravo 22 or mirage 21, but i'm not sure this 502 engine should turn a 23 mirage without problems?
Maybe the motor is low on power?
I tried 24 pitch bravo1 yesterday, it only went 45 Mph @ 4000rpm.
Then i tried Mirage 23, went 45Mph @ 4100 Rpm
I can trim them up to 4800 Rpm and massive Rooster tail but she never gets faster.
With the 24 Bravo1 i had a feeling the bow was mor up as with revolution and mirage.
Rpms are too low i think. I could try now bravo 22 or mirage 21, but i'm not sure this 502 engine should turn a 23 mirage without problems?
Maybe the motor is low on power?
Did you remember to take trailer off the boat ?
#14
Thread Starter
Registered

Joined: Apr 2021
Posts: 104
Likes: 37
From: Germany
#15
Registered

Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 690
Likes: 177
From: Finland
Last edited by JaniH; 05-12-2026 at 06:07 AM.
#18
Thread Starter
Registered

Joined: Apr 2021
Posts: 104
Likes: 37
From: Germany
#19
The factory hook on the 242 is only from the strake to the chine. Once the boat is out of the water, the hook is no longer a factor.
The 26 four blade you tried has way too much pitch for a 502 in the 242. The factory prop was a standard Mirage 23P. You might want to try a 23P Mirage+ or a 22P Bravo.
Why was the X dimension raised? I had a 242 and contemplated raising the X when the transom and stringers were redone, but opted to leave it alone. That boat had a supercharged 454 that ran upper 80's when I had it; all with the factory geometry.
The 26 four blade you tried has way too much pitch for a 502 in the 242. The factory prop was a standard Mirage 23P. You might want to try a 23P Mirage+ or a 22P Bravo.
Why was the X dimension raised? I had a 242 and contemplated raising the X when the transom and stringers were redone, but opted to leave it alone. That boat had a supercharged 454 that ran upper 80's when I had it; all with the factory geometry.
#20
Thread Starter
Registered

Joined: Apr 2021
Posts: 104
Likes: 37
From: Germany
The factory hook on the 242 is only from the strake to the chine. Once the boat is out of the water, the hook is no longer a factor.
The 26 four blade you tried has way too much pitch for a 502 in the 242. The factory prop was a standard Mirage 23P. You might want to try a 23P Mirage+ or a 22P Bravo.
Why was the X dimension raised? I had a 242 and contemplated raising the X when the transom and stringers were redone, but opted to leave it alone. That boat had a supercharged 454 that ran upper 80's when I had it; all with the factory geometry.
The 26 four blade you tried has way too much pitch for a 502 in the 242. The factory prop was a standard Mirage 23P. You might want to try a 23P Mirage+ or a 22P Bravo.
Why was the X dimension raised? I had a 242 and contemplated raising the X when the transom and stringers were redone, but opted to leave it alone. That boat had a supercharged 454 that ran upper 80's when I had it; all with the factory geometry.
On this boat all the stringers bulkheads and transom were made new. I Put the X-Dim on the higher side because i thought Shorty is expensive, spacer is cheap.





