I need insurance for cat
#1
Progressive said no, AAA said no and its a deck boat with only a 496 HO what gives. I think its because its suppose to do 70 or 75. Any ideas. I'm supposed to pick this toy up tomorrow.
#3
Registered

Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 11,903
Likes: 1,140
For Progressive the HO = NO GO! They won't insure anything with more than 415 HP per motor no matter what the size. They have a question on their applications that ask if > 415 HP, if you answer yes they don't insure it. Note this question is per motor not total HP. I called the 800 # and the moron asking the questions disagreed on the per motor vs. total HP question and said they wouldn't insure my twin 6.2 boat since it was 640 HP (320 X 2 motors). I got through to a supervisor that understood the question correctly in reference to per motor > 415 HP.
If you redo the application and say it is a 496 Mag (non HO 375 HP) I bet Progressive will write the policy.
If you redo the application and say it is a 496 Mag (non HO 375 HP) I bet Progressive will write the policy.
#5
Originally Posted by speedygonzalez
Progressive said no, AAA said no and its a deck boat with only a 496 HO what gives. I think its because its suppose to do 70 or 75. Any ideas. I'm supposed to pick this toy up tomorrow.
#6
Originally Posted by Jupiter Sunsation
For Progressive the HO = NO GO! They won't insure anything with more than 415 HP per motor no matter what the size. They have a question on their applications that ask if > 415 HP, if you answer yes they don't insure it. Note this question is per motor not total HP. I called the 800 # and the moron asking the questions disagreed on the per motor vs. total HP question and said they wouldn't insure my twin 6.2 boat since it was 640 HP (320 X 2 motors). I got through to a supervisor that understood the question correctly in reference to per motor > 415 HP.
If you redo the application and say it is a 496 Mag (non HO 375 HP) I bet Progressive will write the policy.
If you redo the application and say it is a 496 Mag (non HO 375 HP) I bet Progressive will write the policy.
Their cutoff is at 75mph and 500hp per side:
http://watercraft.progressive.com/Corporate/types.asp
#7
Originally Posted by Jupiter Sunsation
If you redo the application and say it is a 496 Mag (non HO 375 HP) I bet Progressive will write the policy.
NO, NO, NO!!! DON'T LIE ON THE APPLICATION. Don't take this advise. If you lie on the application and have a claim, they could refuse to pay your claim and then you'd be screwed.
If a 100+mph cat can get insurance, so can you. Just find the right carrier.
Last edited by Semper Fi; 04-26-2006 at 09:50 AM.
#8
Registered

Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 11,903
Likes: 1,140
Originally Posted by CigDaze
Where did you find this?
Their cutoff is at 75mph and 500hp per side:
http://watercraft.progressive.com/Corporate/types.asp
Their cutoff is at 75mph and 500hp per side:
http://watercraft.progressive.com/Corporate/types.asp
Go online and try to get a quote for a 1,000 HP 32/33/35 ft boat. You will get this response:
I think the 500 HP per side is for like a 42 Fountain= TOO SLOW in this boat. The 500 HP is not a blanket qualification. I tried to get a sample quote for a 32 Lavey Craft with 496 HO's and they kicked back this response:
Watercraft Information
Watercraft #1 - 2006 Lavey Craft 32 NuEra Offshore
Watercraft use:
(select "Pleasure" if no other choice applies)
Pleasure use exclusivelyRacing/Speed contestsBusiness/Commercial useRented or leased to othersPrimary residence
Make:
Lavey Craft
Model:
Horsepower cannot exceed 750 on this model.
32 NuEra Offshore
Hull Material:
Fiberglass/CompositeAluminumInflatableWoodSteelOther
Number of Motors:
(do not include trolling motors)
Total Horsepower:
(if more than one motor, add the horsepower of all motors to determine total)
Horsepower cannot exceed 750 on this model.
Engine/outdrive modified to enhance performance?
YesNo
Value of watercraft:
(enter whole dollar numeric values only, ex: 15000)
Does the value include a trailer?
YesNo
Semper, I agreed with your statement 100%. That 50 HP ommission( 496 vs 496 HO) could be real hairy in a claim situtation. I was just trying to show him that the boat being a cat wasn't the problem, the HO motor was.



