Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > Technical > General Q & A
Fuel Usage Triple Engine >

Fuel Usage Triple Engine

Notices

Fuel Usage Triple Engine

Thread Tools
 
Old 12-25-2008 | 10:39 AM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Registered
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
From: Hilton Head, SC
Default Fuel Usage Triple Engine

CAn anyone tell me what the difference in fuel consumption between a 42' Fountain with (2) 525's vs. a 45' Sonic with (3) 500 efi's?
LCPaver is offline  
Reply
Old 12-25-2008 | 12:55 PM
  #2  
GO4BROKE's Avatar
Charter Member #1055/Moderator
25 Year Member
Charter Member
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 4,585
Likes: 0
From: CNY
Default

I can tell you my buddies 386 sonic with trip carb 500's uses about double the fuel of my 386 with twin 496's.

But you're comparing apples to oranges. What type of boating do you want? If you are overnighting you want the sonic. The fountian is 1/2 the size of the sonic, and probably considerably faster even with 1 less motor, definately cheaper to run, maybe not quite as smooth in big water.
So to over simplify, whats priority #1? Speed or Cabin comfort?
__________________
[img][/img]
GO4BROKE is offline  
Reply
Old 12-25-2008 | 01:14 PM
  #3  
Registered
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 14,914
Likes: 1
From: Lake Conroe, TX.
Default

Originally Posted by GO4BROKE
I can tell you my buddies 386 sonic with trip carb 500's uses about double the fuel of my 386 with twin 496's.

But you're comparing apples to oranges. What type of boating do you want? If you are overnighting you want the sonic. The fountian is 1/2 the size of the sonic, and probably considerably faster even with 1 less motor, definately cheaper to run, maybe not quite as smooth in big water.
So to over simplify, whats priority #1? Speed or Cabin comfort?
Triples are way more expensive no matter how you look at it. More oil to change, drives to service. fuel to burn.
jeff1000man is offline  
Reply
Old 12-25-2008 | 02:43 PM
  #4  
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 6,656
Likes: 20
From: Lake Michigan
Default

You will get a lot more feed back with more info...Where or what waters your going to run on, trailering or not, rack or slip, spending overnites, and how fast do you want to cruise, or if you like to WOT it alot.
Knowing this might give you more pleasure owning the 45 over the 42.
Back4More is offline  
Reply
Old 12-25-2008 | 08:56 PM
  #5  
kr1276's Avatar
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 589
Likes: 0
From: Tampa,Fl
Default

I went from twins in a 38 to trips in the 442. I can tell you that I gave up roughly .5 miles per gal vs the twins. I love the trips from a reliability standpoint. I can plane on two if one goes down. I do my own minor maintenance so oil changes, filters, plugs are not that bad. I will probably not go back to twins after owning trips.
kr1276 is offline  
Reply
Old 12-25-2008 | 10:54 PM
  #6  
Registered
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
From: Kentucky
Default

What about insurance increase for trips? I believe the companies do not like them.
orthos1 is offline  
Reply
Old 12-25-2008 | 11:03 PM
  #7  
Banned
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 5,844
Likes: 0
From: Bradenton Florida
Default

Originally Posted by LCPaver
CAn anyone tell me what the difference in fuel consumption between a 42' Fountain with (2) 525's vs. a 45' Sonic with (3) 500 efi's?
Tripples always need more ,,esp. on a heavy boat like a sonic.
DareDevil is offline  
Reply
Old 12-26-2008 | 07:35 AM
  #8  
kr1276's Avatar
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 589
Likes: 0
From: Tampa,Fl
Default

Insurance is higher with trips. I live in Florida, so we get slammed anyway. There are only two companies that will wrtie wind coverage and trips in Florida.

There is definitely less stress on the drives with trips vs. twins.
kr1276 is offline  
Reply
Old 12-26-2008 | 09:12 AM
  #9  
Registered
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 297
Likes: 10
Default

Originally Posted by jeff1000man
Triples are way more expensive no matter how you look at it. More oil to change, drives to service. fuel to burn.
I have a 47 Fountain with triples. There are pros and cons. First, it is a big heavy boat, much larger than the 42. It either needs triples or big power twins to perform adequately. Twin drives would need to be 6's. My boat gets just over 1mpg cruising in the 50's but much lower than that WOT. The triples are actually much lower maintenance than big power twins looking at the maintenance schedules and costs. The drives take less stress as well; however, these statements are only true if you have the 45 sonic, 47 fountain, Black Thunder or other big heavy boats. If you can get a boat that performs well with modest power twins, you're better off from a fuel economy standpoint and overall cost (maintenance, winterization, insurance, etc.). As has already been entered on this thread, the most important factor is your desired type of boating. The cabin on the 42 fountain is dramatically smaller and not comfortable to spend a lot of time in. If that's less important and you only want to occasionally overnight, then it's a better choice.
fountain 47 sc is offline  
Reply
Old 12-26-2008 | 05:57 PM
  #10  
plumbers crack's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,517
Likes: 0
From: bluffton sc
Originally Posted by LCPaver
CAn anyone tell me what the difference in fuel consumption between a 42' Fountain with (2) 525's vs. a 45' Sonic with (3) 500 efi's?
I ****in told you !!!! Welcome to OSO BROTHER! you spend more time in the cooler than looking at fuel guages anyway,its only $1.45 a gallon now cheap ass!

42 fountain is all you................
plumbers crack is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.