Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > Technical > General Q & A
1350hp Sterlings or 777ci NA all motors??? >

1350hp Sterlings or 777ci NA all motors???

Notices
View Poll Results: Which motor should I put in my 47 Fountain Flat Deck??
1350 Sterlings (or similar)
29
53.70%
777ci NA All Motor
16
29.63%
None of the above
9
16.67%
Voters: 54. You may not vote on this poll

1350hp Sterlings or 777ci NA all motors???

Thread Tools
 
Old 03-02-2009 | 09:07 PM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Registered
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 347
Likes: 0
From: Apollo Beach, FL
Default 1350hp Sterlings or 777ci NA all motors???

Hello everyone... I am looking for some power to drop into my 47 fountain flat deck. Lightning Bay in St Pete is putting on the ASD8's right now... so all I have left is power.

At this point, I am thinking either 1350 Sterling (or similar) blower motors or possibly some 777ci all motor engines. The Sterlings usually run around 1150 for torque at 1350hp. The 777cu motors are hard to tell... I'd only be guessing, but I would say the NA motors could push out 1000hp with 1100 on the torque side.

I am mainly going to use this boat for a few poker runs per year and hanging out on the weekends at our local bars (Tampa/ St Pete area). I would rather use this boat on the weekends rather then wrench on it... so... any comments on the Sterling 1350 quality / reliability???

Any comments guys are appreciated....

Q
TeamPSI is offline  
Reply
Old 03-02-2009 | 09:11 PM
  #2  
Registered
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,195
Likes: 28
From: Toronto, Ontario
Default

I have never heard a bad word about sterlings. that thing would fly. however some 777's have got to sound evil. good luck with whatever choice you make
Perlmudder is offline  
Reply
Old 03-02-2009 | 09:15 PM
  #3  
Registered
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 146
Likes: 0
Cool it's only money

if you got the money turbine all the way.
sosatime is offline  
Reply
Old 03-02-2009 | 09:17 PM
  #4  
JasonSmith's Avatar
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,333
Likes: 5
From: USA
Default

777's! You would be the only kid on your block with them & that is well worth it just for bragging rights.
Either package would be fine & many would kill for it.
JasonSmith is offline  
Reply
Old 03-02-2009 | 09:26 PM
  #5  
Smitty's Avatar
VIP Member
20 Year Member
Super Moderators
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 4,213
Likes: 0
From: Chicago il
Default

Sterlings are worth bragging about also. I would go with the blower motors. More torque anytime you will need it. Big cubic inch motors won't live as long without rebuilds either.
__________________
Want your ECU tuned right?? Call Mark at Precision www.pmefi.com
Smitty is offline  
Reply
Old 03-02-2009 | 09:32 PM
  #6  
Banned
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 5,844
Likes: 0
From: Bradenton Florida
Default

Originally Posted by Smitty
Sterlings are worth bragging about also. I would go with the blower motors. More torque anytime you will need it. Big cubic inch motors won't live as long without rebuilds either.
I think blower motors are less reliable then ci !!!!! Proven !!!

Sterlings are ok but rebuilt every 50 -100 hours !!!


I would built some nice 660+ ci donavon aluminum 11.8 talldecks N/A or EFI ,,making 1000+ HP and 1100+ tourge and sound like PURE POWER and are very reliable !!!!!
DareDevil is offline  
Reply
Old 03-02-2009 | 09:36 PM
  #7  
Registered
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,034
Likes: 1
From: Oshawa, Ontario, Canada
Default

How about adding another 100-150 cubes to those 777's, here is a link to Sonny's website, I KNOW he has done some pump gas 900+ inch motors that where very low maintainance and made well over 1500HP, You might not have the "wow" factor of a blower motor, but, running pump gas and having 900+ inches under the hatch would make quite a statement!.


http://www.sonnysracingengines.com/sar932.html
n20michael is offline  
Reply
Old 03-02-2009 | 10:03 PM
  #8  
JasonSmith's Avatar
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,333
Likes: 5
From: USA
Default

Originally Posted by n20michael
How about adding another 100-150 cubes to those 777's, here is a link to Sonny's website, I KNOW he has done some pump gas 900+ inch motors that where very low maintainance and made well over 1500HP, You might not have the "wow" factor of a blower motor, but, running pump gas and having 900+ inches under the hatch would make quite a statement!.


http://www.sonnysracingengines.com/sar932.html
I just made a mess on my belly. Those are bad!
JasonSmith is offline  
Reply
Old 03-02-2009 | 10:16 PM
  #9  
CB-BLR's Avatar
Chris
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,426
Likes: 1
From: Snohomish, WA
Default

My vote is for big cubic inch NA motors.

Chris
CB-BLR is offline  
Reply
Old 03-02-2009 | 10:20 PM
  #10  
Thread Starter
Registered
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 347
Likes: 0
From: Apollo Beach, FL
Default

Those 900's are VERY nasty... but I'd rather have two lambo's in my garage then a pair of the 900's... (close to 100K each!!) just my 2 cents.

I am worried about the Sterling rebuild factor... I figured one rebuild per each season... vs. a large ci motor that may get me through two seasons or better. Thoughts?

I love the comments guys!!! keep them coming!!!
TeamPSI is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.