AT vs. OL
#1
Thread Starter
Registered

Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,863
Likes: 793
From: St. Pete Beach, FL
Not that I can afford either, but I'm bored. Two new boats here that were similarly priced, I see the AT just got a big price drop though. So which is better/the better deal and why? Commence furious debate!
http://www.offshoreonly.com/classifi...o55113-en.html
http://www.offshoreonly.com/classifi...o54328-en.html
OL is lighter, staggered, faster, more fuel efficient. 99mph with 520s at 369k
AT is bigger, more cabin, nicer? 90+? 325k now.
I'd take the AT! Love that interior and color combo, classy.
http://www.offshoreonly.com/classifi...o55113-en.html
http://www.offshoreonly.com/classifi...o54328-en.html
OL is lighter, staggered, faster, more fuel efficient. 99mph with 520s at 369k
AT is bigger, more cabin, nicer? 90+? 325k now.
I'd take the AT! Love that interior and color combo, classy.
#8
Registered

Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 785
Likes: 84
From: Lake Wallenpaupack, PA
Either! I like the look of the new OL 36SL however, I think in this case I'd go with the AT. I just like the old school styling and rough water handling of the AT. Not that I've ever been on one!!
#9
Registered

Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,254
Likes: 44
From: Toronto Canada
The AT is a bigger boat at 37 feet assuming they are not including the bolt on swim platform as the OL is a 36 foot boat with what appears to be a 3 foot bussle . The AT definitely has a bigger cabin and appaers to have a roomier cockpit . Notwithstanding all of that, my guess is the OL might hold its value a bit better in the long run.
RG.
RG.
#10
Registered

Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 6,213
Likes: 376
From: Plainville/Old Lyme, CT Boca Raton, FL
Here's my beef, if you took the name brands off the boats and the average person looked at the two side by side, that particular OL looks like a stripped out model with no bling, no billet, etc...
I understand that OL is trying to build this boat as a lower cost type boat but it def shows. Why can't they build a boat optioned out, with the fit and finish that the AT has for the same price?
I understand that OL is trying to build this boat as a lower cost type boat but it def shows. Why can't they build a boat optioned out, with the fit and finish that the AT has for the same price?




