Notices
General Boating Discussion

AT vs. OL

Thread Tools
 
Old 01-21-2014 | 04:15 PM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,863
Likes: 793
From: St. Pete Beach, FL
Default AT vs. OL

Not that I can afford either, but I'm bored. Two new boats here that were similarly priced, I see the AT just got a big price drop though. So which is better/the better deal and why? Commence furious debate!

http://www.offshoreonly.com/classifi...o55113-en.html

http://www.offshoreonly.com/classifi...o54328-en.html

OL is lighter, staggered, faster, more fuel efficient. 99mph with 520s at 369k

AT is bigger, more cabin, nicer? 90+? 325k now.

I'd take the AT! Love that interior and color combo, classy.
hogie roll is offline  
Reply
Old 01-21-2014 | 04:17 PM
  #2  
Registered
10 Year Member
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 1,541
Likes: 219
From: MI
Default

Fountain
12meter joe is offline  
Reply
Old 01-21-2014 | 04:19 PM
  #3  
Indy's Avatar
Member #154
25 Year Member
Platinum Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 8,003
Likes: 1,080
From: SW CT & Long Island Sound
Default

Cabo
Indy is offline  
Reply
Old 01-21-2014 | 04:26 PM
  #4  
Registered
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 414
Likes: 1
From: Overland Park, KS 87mm Loto
Default

Order a new 36' Pantera
baditude is offline  
Reply
Old 01-21-2014 | 04:43 PM
  #5  
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 6,213
Likes: 376
From: Plainville/Old Lyme, CT Boca Raton, FL
Default

Active Thunder hands down of comparing those two boats. When you start getting into higher end obviously OL...
302Sport is offline  
Reply
Old 01-21-2014 | 04:45 PM
  #6  
Registered
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 724
Likes: 0
From: Lake Travis
Default

Give me the AT painted like the OL
Crossett is offline  
Reply
Old 01-21-2014 | 04:48 PM
  #7  
Registered
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 9,969
Likes: 6,461
From: Chicago
Default

I like the less couch bigger bed of the OL.
ICDEDPPL is offline  
Reply
Old 01-21-2014 | 05:04 PM
  #8  
Registered
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 785
Likes: 84
From: Lake Wallenpaupack, PA
Default

Either! I like the look of the new OL 36SL however, I think in this case I'd go with the AT. I just like the old school styling and rough water handling of the AT. Not that I've ever been on one!!
MonkeySea2 is offline  
Reply
Old 01-21-2014 | 05:12 PM
  #9  
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,254
Likes: 44
From: Toronto Canada
Default

The AT is a bigger boat at 37 feet assuming they are not including the bolt on swim platform as the OL is a 36 foot boat with what appears to be a 3 foot bussle . The AT definitely has a bigger cabin and appaers to have a roomier cockpit . Notwithstanding all of that, my guess is the OL might hold its value a bit better in the long run.
RG.
Rick G is offline  
Reply
Old 01-21-2014 | 05:24 PM
  #10  
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 6,213
Likes: 376
From: Plainville/Old Lyme, CT Boca Raton, FL
Default

Here's my beef, if you took the name brands off the boats and the average person looked at the two side by side, that particular OL looks like a stripped out model with no bling, no billet, etc...

I understand that OL is trying to build this boat as a lower cost type boat but it def shows. Why can't they build a boat optioned out, with the fit and finish that the AT has for the same price?
302Sport is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.