AT vs. OL
 

Not that I can afford either, but I'm bored. Two new boats here that were similarly priced, I see the AT just got a big price drop though. So which is better/the better deal and why? Commence furious debate!

http://www.offshoreonly.com/classifi...o55113-en.html

http://www.offshoreonly.com/classifi...o54328-en.html

OL is lighter, staggered, faster, more fuel efficient. 99mph with 520s at 369k

AT is bigger, more cabin, nicer? 90+? 325k now.

I'd take the AT! Love that interior and color combo, classy.

Fountain

Cabo

Order a new 36' Pantera :party-smiley-004:

Active Thunder hands down of comparing those two boats. When you start getting into higher end obviously OL...

Give me the AT painted like the OL

I like the less couch bigger bed of the OL.

Either! I like the look of the new OL 36SL however, I think in this case I'd go with the AT. I just like the old school styling and rough water handling of the AT. Not that I've ever been on one!!

The AT is a bigger boat at 37 feet assuming they are not including the bolt on swim platform as the OL is a 36 foot boat with what appears to be a 3 foot bussle . The AT definitely has a bigger cabin and appaers to have a roomier cockpit . Notwithstanding all of that, my guess is the OL might hold its value a bit better in the long run.
RG.

Here's my beef, if you took the name brands off the boats and the average person looked at the two side by side, that particular OL looks like a stripped out model with no bling, no billet, etc...

I understand that OL is trying to build this boat as a lower cost type boat but it def shows. Why can't they build a boat optioned out, with the fit and finish that the AT has for the same price?