AT vs. OL

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

01-21-2014 | 08:30 PM

#21

Pwraddr

Registered

Joined: Aug 2011

Posts: 1,696

Likes: 2

From: Metro Detroit

Quote:

Originally Posted by korvetkeith

Isn't a 33 being built?

Yes, but is think with 565s. It'll be fast.

I think the 33 AT with 525 was 90 plus.

01-21-2014 | 08:42 PM

#22

jeff32

Registered

Joined: Jun 2004

Posts: 8,218

Likes: 573

From: St-Hyacinthe, quebec, canada

yes I've seen it!

01-21-2014 | 08:48 PM

#23

Drock78

Registered

Joined: Jul 2010

Posts: 2,687

Likes: 235

From: Grand Rapids, Mi

Plus...I don't think that there is a stripped down version of any AT. Built for ride. Built to last. Built for comfort. I'll take the AT any day.

01-21-2014 | 09:01 PM

#24

jeff32

Registered

Joined: Jun 2004

Posts: 8,218

Likes: 573

From: St-Hyacinthe, quebec, canada

can't seem to be able to post pictures of the 33...

01-21-2014 | 09:03 PM

#25

302Sport

Registered

Joined: Oct 2005

Posts: 6,213

Likes: 376

From: Plainville/Old Lyme, CT Boca Raton, FL

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pwraddr

Yes, but is think with 565s. It'll be fast.

I think the 33 AT with 525 was 90 plus.

My buddies 33 with 525's ran 93mph

01-21-2014 | 09:22 PM

#26

Greatguy66

Banned

Joined: Aug 2012

Posts: 759

Likes: 0

Both very nice I guess the AT because it's cheaper!

01-22-2014 | 10:41 AM

#27

Excess

Registered

Joined: Nov 2009

Posts: 356

Likes: 9

From: Montreal, Canada

Quote:

Originally Posted by Greatguy66

Both very nice I guess the AT because it's cheaper!

You mean the customer's are cheaper

The AT offer the best ride best value on the market.

01-22-2014 | 11:48 AM

#28

machloosy

Gold Member

Joined: Jan 2011

Posts: 1,097

Likes: 0

From: Syracuse, NY

I don't think IMO, there is even a question. The AT. You spend 90% of your time in the cockpit either relaxing or driving. 37 AT will ride better, and has more cockpit space. Plus it just looks nicer overall!

01-22-2014 | 12:06 PM

#29

Captain YARRR

Registered

Joined: Dec 2010

Posts: 1,671

Likes: 29

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pwraddr

Yes, but is think with 565s. It'll be fat.

I think the 33 AT with 525 was 90 plus.

Anyone know what a new 33 AT is running these days?

Edit: I mean cost of a new 33 AT

Last edited by Captain YARRR; 01-22-2014 at 01:23 PM.

01-22-2014 | 12:15 PM

#30

Gladhe8er

Registered

Joined: Jan 2006

Posts: 3,692

Likes: 3

From: Fairfield, CT

93 with 525's. I bet 96-97 with 565's.

Reply Share

First
Prev
3 / 31
Next
Last