Victor Jr Intakes
11-13-2018 | 03:50 AM
#1
Thread Starter
Registered
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 126
Likes: 1
Victor Jr Intakes
Curious if Victor Jr Intake Manifolds are comparable to HP500 Intakes. They look similar, but I'm not sure if they work well. I currently have 454 Mag intakes with spacers and I would like to swap out for a single plane and eliminate the spacer. 
Thank you.
Thank you.
Last edited by Titan907; 11-13-2018 at 03:56 AM. Reason: Adding info
11-14-2018 | 01:07 PM
#3
Platinum Member
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 7,317
Likes: 1,032
From: frankenmuth michigan
I think it would be a big step backwards as far as torque I dynoed a 502 with Edelbrock heads and a fairly small cam this spring and the torque difference between a junior and a standard performer was about 40 Less foot pounds and compared to Edelbrock RPM air gap performer was 60 less foot pounds it gained nothing until you got way past the powerband and it was a couple horsepower for what it's worth
Last edited by articfriends; 11-14-2018 at 01:11 PM.
11-14-2018 | 02:12 PM
#4
Registered
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 2,888
Likes: 148
From: SF Bay Area
I think it would be a big step backwards as far as torque I dynoed a 502 with Edelbrock heads and a fairly small cam this spring and the torque difference between a junior and a standard performer was about 40 Less foot pounds and compared to Edelbrock RPM air gap performer was 60 less foot pounds it gained nothing until you got way past the powerband and it was a couple horsepower for what it's worth
Also the Victor Jr needs a TON of porting to make work well. I may be wrong, but I believe it was made for the peanut port heads. At least the oval unit I had had about a 1/4” of material that needed to be hogged out of it.
11-14-2018 | 02:12 PM
#5
Registered
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,696
Likes: 93
From: Pa
I think it would be a big step backwards as far as torque I dynoed a 502 with Edelbrock heads and a fairly small cam this spring and the torque difference between a junior and a standard performer was about 40 Less foot pounds and compared to Edelbrock RPM air gap performer was 60 less foot pounds it gained nothing until you got way past the powerband and it was a couple horsepower for what it's worth
11-14-2018 | 02:13 PM
#6
Registered
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 215
Likes: 8
From: Cedar Springs,MI
I think it would be a big step backwards as far as torque I dynoed a 502 with Edelbrock heads and a fairly small cam this spring and the torque difference between a junior and a standard performer was about 40 Less foot pounds and compared to Edelbrock RPM air gap performer was 60 less foot pounds it gained nothing until you got way past the powerband and it was a couple horsepower for what it's worth
11-14-2018 | 06:31 PM
#8
Registered
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 2,888
Likes: 148
From: SF Bay Area
