Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > Technical > General Q & A
Difference in engine builders bore stroke combos >

Difference in engine builders bore stroke combos

Notices

Difference in engine builders bore stroke combos

Thread Tools
 
Old 04-03-2020 | 07:45 AM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Registered
 
Joined: Mar 2020
Posts: 65
Likes: 1
Default Difference in engine builders bore stroke combos

Whats the advantage or reason engine builders swear by their bore and stroke combos in high performancr big blocks
mercury 1350 run 557c.i
sterling runs 557
cheif runs 572
teague runs 565
some others run 588, 598 etc
whats the differance running blowers in hp range from 1100 to 1500hp bore and stroke engines
Fresh is offline  
Reply
Old 04-03-2020 | 08:00 AM
  #2  
Registered
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 193
Likes: 62
From: Harrison Twp, MI
Default

Its really all just preference really.

Adding stroke adds torque and pulls the powerband down.

Adding cubic inch can allow you to make more power on pump gas with a blower.

Putting a 4.500" stroke in a STD Deck block is possible but it kills BDC stability and just makes a real pile of **** combination.

Some builders probably prefer to use short strokes and turn 6,200 vs longer strokes turning 5,200.

You can make the power you ask out of a bunch of engine combinations.

c0ncEpT is offline  
Reply
Old 04-03-2020 | 09:46 AM
  #3  
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,854
Likes: 786
From: St. Pete Beach, FL
Default

Originally Posted by Fresh
Whats the advantage or reason engine builders swear by their bore and stroke combos in high performancr big blocks
mercury 1350 run 557c.i
sterling runs 557
cheif runs 572
teague runs 565
some others run 588, 598 etc
whats the differance running blowers in hp range from 1100 to 1500hp bore and stroke engines
Well there are 2 common deck heights which is confounding your comparison. 9.8 and 10.2.

Assuming we’re talking about Dart blocks, the general consensus is you shouldn’t run the 4.6” bore size popular with NA apps. So you’re talking 4.47-4.56ish.

For strokes, in a 9.8” deck block, everyone is fine with 4.25” stroke. Some debate whether 4.375” significantly reduces bore life. So in a 9.8 block, 4.5x4.25 gives you 540, 4.57x4.25 gets you 557.

In 10.2” deck height block you could go up to 4.5” stroke. 4.5x4.5=572. 4.56x4.5=588

More aggressive stroke in a 10.2 is a 4.75”
hogie roll is offline  
Reply
Old 04-03-2020 | 10:21 AM
  #4  
Thread Starter
Registered
 
Joined: Mar 2020
Posts: 65
Likes: 1
Default Dart block

Yes would be a dart block. Since i will be running a hoodscoop probably should go with a tall deck 10.2 . Also a 1471 roots blower. Boat would be used for poker runs and occasional trips to sand bar. What you thinking?

Fresh is offline  
Reply
Old 04-03-2020 | 01:58 PM
  #5  
Registered
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 193
Likes: 62
From: Harrison Twp, MI
Default

Originally Posted by Fresh
Yes would be a dart block. Since i will be running a hoodscoop probably should go with a tall deck 10.2 . Also a 1471 roots blower. Boat would be used for poker runs and occasional trips to sand bar. What you thinking?
I would build either a 589 or 572

4.560" Bore x 4.500" Stroke - 589ci
10.200 Deck
6.660 rod
.100 in the hole
8:1 CR

4.560" Bore x 4.375" Stroke - 572ci
10.200 Deck
6.700 rod
.100 in the hole
8:1 CR
c0ncEpT is offline  
Reply
Old 04-03-2020 | 03:01 PM
  #6  
Thread Starter
Registered
 
Joined: Mar 2020
Posts: 65
Likes: 1
Default Whats your reasoning

Have shiroff racing shooting me ther numbers 36k for a 588 with 1471 1050hp on pump gas
Hp numbers seem low for that combo what you think. Why would you go with 572 589?
Fresh is offline  
Reply
Old 04-03-2020 | 03:17 PM
  #7  
Registered
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 2,227
Likes: 531
Default

The 565s always seem to make good hp and have a decent life span.
underpsi68 is offline  
Reply
Old 04-03-2020 | 04:10 PM
  #8  
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,854
Likes: 786
From: St. Pete Beach, FL
Default

Originally Posted by Fresh
Have shiroff racing shooting me ther numbers 36k for a 588 with 1471 1050hp on pump gas
Hp numbers seem low for that combo what you think. Why would you go with 572 589?
Roots just aren’t great on pump piss, too much heat.

If it were me, I’d do a 10.2 588 around 7.5 to 1 with a non intercooled whipple 510 and a mild cam with around .600 or less lift.

I think that would get you to 1200 around 8 psi. Should be relatively reliable and low maintenance.
hogie roll is offline  
Reply
Old 04-03-2020 | 04:15 PM
  #9  
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,854
Likes: 786
From: St. Pete Beach, FL
Default

Originally Posted by Fresh
Have shiroff racing shooting me ther numbers 36k for a 588 with 1471 1050hp on pump gas
Hp numbers seem low for that combo what you think. Why would you go with 572 589?
Try Eddie young, Teague, Sterling or BUP on here. Eddie does 1100hp fuel injected whipple 598s.
hogie roll is offline  
Reply
Old 04-03-2020 | 06:15 PM
  #10  
Thread Starter
Registered
 
Joined: Mar 2020
Posts: 65
Likes: 1
Default

Ok i will just but i dont want fuel inj. Just carbs
Fresh is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.