Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > Owners Forum > Velocity
320 handling >

320 handling

Notices

320 handling

Thread Tools
 
Old 08-05-2007 | 02:01 PM
  #21  
Registered
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 2,111
Likes: 1
From: Austin,Texas
Default

Brad21hudson- back to your original question. I put many hours in 30 Velocitys . I enjoyed them very much in the Chesapeake. I found you always had tab in it. between 2 and 4 on most of them. Never less than 2.They were great running boats 70 to 80 mph over 80 you better pay attention.
Jim
MOBILEMERCMAN is offline  
Reply
Old 08-05-2007 | 09:19 PM
  #22  
Registered
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 225
Likes: 0
From: Sandusky, OH
Default

Originally Posted by boatstogo
What did you ever work out with the 32 handling? I am thinking of moving down from a 47 Fountain to a 32 Velocity with 496's that is in Ohio. I have heard horror stories on the boat's handling at 80+MPH. Would be interested in opinions on 32 Velocity vs. 32 Fountain with stock power. Thanks
Where is the 32 w/496's at in OH? What year is it?
turnerrd is offline  
Reply
Old 08-05-2007 | 10:59 PM
  #23  
Velocity Vector's Avatar
Crazy Energy
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 4,334
Likes: 1
From: Oklahoma God's country no one else wants it.
Default Help, Maximus labbed 5 blade props

Any sugestions to get me close on pitch for the Maximus labbed 5 bladed props, 2003 320 Velocity, twin 496ho's Bravo one's. Will the props even fit a bravo one small shaft?The boat came with no props so I can't give a starting line. K.C.
Velocity Vector is offline  
Reply
Old 08-06-2007 | 02:53 PM
  #24  
Revelocity's Avatar
Registered
25 Year Member
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 703
Likes: 67
From: Warwick, MD USA
Default

Every boat is unique as are the conditions you run it in. I'd recommend that you start with a pair of Hydro Q4's (~27" perhaps) to get a baseline for your boat. Get it dialed in first with the 4 blades instead of experimenting with the much more expensive 5 blades. According to Steve Stepp, you'll need a higher x dimension or shorty drive to get any more top end using a 5 blade. It comes down to if you want the extra bite the 5 blade offers (better cruising) over the 4 blade for overall handling. For my 320, a 5 blade would have given too much stern lift at the top end but that may not be the case for you. I undertand that the Maximus has improved this year but I'd still look at Hydro Q5 if you decide to go the five blade route. Good luck!
Revelocity is offline  
Reply
Old 08-06-2007 | 04:48 PM
  #25  
Registered
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,838
Likes: 0
From: Punta Gorda
Default

Are your mot. the 375 or 425 hp? We allways run hydros.
Velocity Tom is offline  
Reply
Old 08-06-2007 | 06:31 PM
  #26  
Registered
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,838
Likes: 0
From: Punta Gorda
Default

We ran 28pitch labed 5 blade hydros. And ran 84/85 mph
Velocity Tom is offline  
Reply
Old 08-07-2007 | 08:47 PM
  #27  
1HYPER1's Avatar
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,922
Likes: 27
From: MIDDLETOWN,DE
Default

The 5 blades are harder on drives and try some other props other than the Hydros.The Mercury blades work better as all around propellers.
1HYPER1 is offline  
Reply
Old 08-08-2007 | 06:48 PM
  #28  
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 5,325
Likes: 112
From: Northern NY
Default

Originally Posted by Rippem
underpowered is the biggest problem.
The place to start is with enough power to get the boat to stay nose up and on the pad without overtrim.

Agreed Rip. But to make this hull somewhat respectable you need 600 HP, that's 1200 total. Even 500 a side is marginal. With the extra horsepower you can manhandle the boat to control an otherwise really foul handling hull design. Eight years with a 32/320, the first two with 454 Mags/365HP, and six years with 600+ per side, the additional HP really helped. Ask HYPER as he now owns the boat, it's still the fastest 32 out there per Stepp himself, per HYPER. The biggest problem with the hull is the pad is too small to balance and carry the boat, hence the foul handling characteristics.
RaggedEdge is offline  
Reply
Old 08-15-2007 | 11:49 PM
  #29  
Velocity Vector's Avatar
Crazy Energy
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 4,334
Likes: 1
From: Oklahoma God's country no one else wants it.
Default

Originally Posted by Velocity Tom
Are your mot. the 375 or 425 hp? We allways run hydros.
425hp
Velocity Vector is offline  
Reply
Old 08-15-2007 | 11:51 PM
  #30  
Velocity Vector's Avatar
Crazy Energy
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 4,334
Likes: 1
From: Oklahoma God's country no one else wants it.
Default

Originally Posted by Revelocity
Every boat is unique as are the conditions you run it in. I'd recommend that you start with a pair of Hydro Q4's (~27" perhaps) to get a baseline for your boat. Get it dialed in first with the 4 blades instead of experimenting with the much more expensive 5 blades. According to Steve Stepp, you'll need a higher x dimension or shorty drive to get any more top end using a 5 blade. It comes down to if you want the extra bite the 5 blade offers (better cruising) over the 4 blade for overall handling. For my 320, a 5 blade would have given too much stern lift at the top end but that may not be the case for you. I undertand that the Maximus has improved this year but I'd still look at Hydro Q5 if you decide to go the five blade route. Good luck!
I got a set of 4 blade labbed 30 pitch props, I'll get a base line as you said and go from there. Thanks
Velocity Vector is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.