Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > Owners Forum > Velocity
VR-1 vs. 290SC >

VR-1 vs. 290SC

Notices

VR-1 vs. 290SC

Thread Tools
 
Old 08-30-2007, 01:36 PM
  #1  
Registered
Thread Starter
 
Gladhe8er's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Fairfield, CT
Posts: 3,692
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default VR-1 vs. 290SC

Hey guys,
Thinking about getting one fo these boats for next summer. Can anybody tell me what the difference is between these 2 models?
Thanks.
Gladhe8er is offline  
Old 08-30-2007, 02:05 PM
  #2  
Gold Member
Gold Member
 
Shore Thing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Hollywood, MD
Posts: 1,212
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

as far as my understanding goes, the VR-1 is just a cut down 290SC. the VR-1 is also a better performer.

for the family - 290sc

for performance - VR-1

Depends on what you want to do with the boat.
Shore Thing is offline  
Old 08-30-2007, 02:12 PM
  #3  
Registered
Thread Starter
 
Gladhe8er's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Fairfield, CT
Posts: 3,692
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Gotcha. Now I can tell by looking at pictures side by side. Of course I would go VR-1, but the grilfriend likes the bathroom on the SC!
Gladhe8er is offline  
Old 08-30-2007, 03:42 PM
  #4  
Registered
 
ls1nova's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Cecil County, Maryland
Posts: 388
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Don't worry about the enclosed head. If your anything like the majority of us, you will never use it anyway.
ls1nova is offline  
Old 08-30-2007, 04:16 PM
  #5  
Registered
Thread Starter
 
Gladhe8er's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Fairfield, CT
Posts: 3,692
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ls1nova
Don't worry about the enclosed head. If your anything like the majority of us, you will never use it anyway.
Kinda figured that. too bad she is a small girl.
Gladhe8er is offline  
Old 08-30-2007, 04:45 PM
  #6  
Registered
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Middletown, DE
Posts: 340
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Gladhe8er
Gotcha. Now I can tell by looking at pictures side by side. Of course I would go VR-1, but the grilfriend likes the bathroom on the SC!
tell her to pee off the back
Vicious22 is offline  
Old 08-30-2007, 05:12 PM
  #7  
Registered
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Lakewood, NY, USA
Posts: 3,482
Received 317 Likes on 174 Posts
Default

Get the boat you like, not the one the girlfriend likes. Girls are much easier to find then boats!

Last edited by Padraig; 08-30-2007 at 09:44 PM.
Padraig is offline  
Old 08-30-2007, 08:26 PM
  #8  
Registered
 
1HYPER1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: MIDDLETOWN,DE
Posts: 1,906
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

The 290 SC is OK if you want a Sea Ray,get the VR1 and have a porta poty on hand that way she can still take care of buisness.
1HYPER1 is offline  
Old 08-31-2007, 05:59 AM
  #9  
Registered
 
CAVelocity's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Umatilla, FL
Posts: 287
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Drive both if you can! The center of gravity of the VR-1 is MUCH lower than the 290SC. The 290SC tends to "roll" side to side and fall off of the pad much easier. In my opion, the 496 mag HO isn't enough power for the 290SC.... it's too hard to keep it on the pad when you're trimed out. In a poker run situation, this can be sometimes scary to passengers. If you have any interest in running poker runs, the VR-1 is deffinently the right boat.

Also, their are some construction differences between the two: the 290SC has balsa coring in the hull, whereas the VR-1 is completely composite.

As mentioned earlier.... no one ever uses the enclosed head. A buddy of mine just built his 2nd 290SC (he has a small baby) and had the factory omit the head altogether to save weight. My wife and I took out the porta potti from our VR-1 after the first season.... I can almost always find her a private place to go off of the back of the boat (sometimes that can be a fun adventure!).

Let me know if you're interested in a really nice used VR-1.... I don't think you'll find another one as nice.

Good luck!

Last edited by CAVelocity; 08-31-2007 at 06:02 AM.
CAVelocity is offline  
Old 09-04-2007, 08:15 AM
  #10  
Registered
Thread Starter
 
Gladhe8er's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Fairfield, CT
Posts: 3,692
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by CAVelocity
Drive both if you can! The center of gravity of the VR-1 is MUCH lower than the 290SC. The 290SC tends to "roll" side to side and fall off of the pad much easier. In my opion, the 496 mag HO isn't enough power for the 290SC.... it's too hard to keep it on the pad when you're trimed out. In a poker run situation, this can be sometimes scary to passengers. If you have any interest in running poker runs, the VR-1 is deffinently the right boat.

Also, their are some construction differences between the two: the 290SC has balsa coring in the hull, whereas the VR-1 is completely composite.

As mentioned earlier.... no one ever uses the enclosed head. A buddy of mine just built his 2nd 290SC (he has a small baby) and had the factory omit the head altogether to save weight. My wife and I took out the porta potti from our VR-1 after the first season.... I can almost always find her a private place to go off of the back of the boat (sometimes that can be a fun adventure!).

Let me know if you're interested in a really nice used VR-1.... I don't think you'll find another one as nice.

Good luck!
I saw your boat for sale in the classifieds. We love the different paint. Definitely something we would be interested in...only problem is location. I'll be in Key West for the worlds and then Miami the week afterwards. Already mapquested you...you're 4 hours away...
Gladhe8er is offline  


Quick Reply: VR-1 vs. 290SC


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.