Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > Technical > General Q & A
Roller rocker debate >

Roller rocker debate

Notices

Roller rocker debate

Thread Tools
 
Old 01-04-2017, 09:35 PM
  #11  
Registered
iTrader: (7)
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: NW Michigan
Posts: 8,302
Received 1,493 Likes on 807 Posts
Default

1.8's are a tool for me for the most part although have run them in the past. In some cases build depending they work well and worthy. Others not and gain not worthy. Never had valvetrain issues with them. It like 14 apache mentioned in your application gains would more than likely be minimal. I'd seriously consider 741 cam in your build.
getrdunn is offline  
Old 01-04-2017, 10:12 PM
  #12  
Registered
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: San Tan Valley AZ
Posts: 491
Received 13 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by getrdunn
1.8's are a tool for me for the most part although have run them in the past. In some cases build depending they work well and worthy. Others not and gain not worthy. Never had valvetrain issues with them. It like 14 apache mentioned in your application gains would more than likely be minimal. I'd seriously consider 741 cam in your build.
If I could find a couple used 741 cams I would. I am opting not to mill my heads which will affectively put me at 8.6:1 compression. I dont want to hurt flow. I will be bore notching the cylinders though. Is compression too low for that cam?? Figure the .5 im giving up by not milling is only 20-30hp max and if i want to do blowers later compression wont be too bad
mggdoors is offline  
Old 01-05-2017, 09:07 AM
  #13  
Registered
iTrader: (3)
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: chicago
Posts: 11,332
Received 71 Likes on 39 Posts
Default

You have a 4.25 stroke engine. 8.6:1 is low, but pretty much same thing mercury used on the 525efi, 502 mags,, etc. Those were 4 inch stroke. A 4.25 stroke will require more camshaft.

I personally think that cam is going to be small in that build. Mercs 525efi, had a 236/244 cam with fairly low static. They run great. If you wanna make some power, youll need a cam that doesnt die at 5000-5200rpm.

I bought the comp ultra pro mag XD rockers last winter. So far so good. They look very beefy compared to the old cranes I had. I too ran cranes for years, had good luck, only 1 broke a trunnion. Then again, years back, we were running alot less spring psi, lot less rpm, milder cams, and so on.
MILD THUNDER is offline  
Old 01-05-2017, 09:10 AM
  #14  
Registered
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: San Tan Valley AZ
Posts: 491
Received 13 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by MILD THUNDER
You have a 4.25 stroke engine. 8.6:1 is low, but pretty much same thing mercury used on the 525efi, 502 mags,, etc. Those were 4 inch stroke. A 4.25 stroke will require more camshaft.

I personally think that cam is going to be small in that build. Mercs 525efi, had a 236/244 cam with fairly low static. They run great. If you wanna make some power, youll need a cam that doesnt die at 5000-5200rpm.

I bought the comp ultra pro mag XD rockers last winter. So far so good. They look very beefy compared to the old cranes I had. I too ran cranes for years, had good luck, only 1 broke a trunnion. Then again, years back, we were running alot less spring psi, lot less rpm, milder cams, and so on.
Do those rockers clear the stock valve covers on gen vi
mggdoors is offline  
Old 01-05-2017, 09:11 AM
  #15  
Registered
iTrader: (3)
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: chicago
Posts: 11,332
Received 71 Likes on 39 Posts
Default

Im guessing you are running a flat top piston? If the block was 0 decked, with the eq heads, should be right about 9:1 off the top of my head with a .039 gasket

is that what you have ?
MILD THUNDER is offline  
Old 01-05-2017, 09:12 AM
  #16  
Registered
iTrader: (3)
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: chicago
Posts: 11,332
Received 71 Likes on 39 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mggdoors
Do those rockers clear the stock valve covers on gen vi
I have not tried that . Cant say.
MILD THUNDER is offline  
Old 01-05-2017, 09:15 AM
  #17  
Registered
iTrader: (3)
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: chicago
Posts: 11,332
Received 71 Likes on 39 Posts
Default

I too would stay with the 1.7 rockers. The 1820-16 have billet pushrod inserts, those are the ones i am running. The 1620-16, do not, and go for around 300-320 bucks if i recall , 100 bucks less than the 1820-16.
MILD THUNDER is offline  
Old 01-05-2017, 09:58 AM
  #18  
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 2,886
Received 143 Likes on 95 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mggdoors
Do those rockers clear the stock valve covers on gen vi
The lock nuts did not clear my stock genvi valve covers. Close, a thicker cork gasket might of worked, but I bought the Hardin units instead.
Baja Rooster is offline  
Old 01-05-2017, 10:06 AM
  #19  
Registered
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: San Tan Valley AZ
Posts: 491
Received 13 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by MILD THUNDER
Im guessing you are running a flat top piston? If the block was 0 decked, with the eq heads, should be right about 9:1 off the top of my head with a .039 gasket

is that what you have ?
Flat tops. 020 in hole. 3cc reliefs 119 heads. Gonna run steel shim gasket to keep compression up and quench in check.
mggdoors is offline  
Old 01-05-2017, 10:08 AM
  #20  
Registered
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: San Tan Valley AZ
Posts: 491
Received 13 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Baja Rooster
The lock nuts did not clear my stock genvi valve covers. Close, a thicker cork gasket might of worked, but I bought the Hardin units instead.
Good to know
mggdoors is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.