Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > Owners Forum > Baja
Baja History "The Thread" >

Baja History "The Thread"

Notices

Baja History "The Thread"

Thread Tools
 
Old 10-13-2006 | 12:43 PM
  #101  
StillHaulin@63's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 361
Likes: 0
From: California
Default Re: Baja History "The Thread"

Originally Posted by JasonSmith
I guess what I am trying to say is that a single engine in a 29 Outlaw is like a v-6 in a camaro. Sure you look good, but the chicks don't dig it.
Jason
Some of us ride with our wives & grandchildren
Bill
StillHaulin@63 is offline  
Reply
Old 10-13-2006 | 12:45 PM
  #102  
Dock Holiday's Avatar
Thread Starter
Charter Member #34
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 7,151
Likes: 2
From: Beautiful North Carolina
Default Re: Baja History "The Thread"

Originally Posted by SuperTramp
I see the activators, kryptonites and superboats do it with good/great results, just wondering if a big brand name like baja does it ?
Yes they built 29's that were single engine. But the 29 is a BIG boat and it was SLOW.

If you want room and a good riding boat at 50MPH it is great.

Activators are VERY fast boats. A few showed up at the Jacksonville run last year and WOW were they fast. They smoked all the Velocity folks. But it is a SMALL boat. You can put three of them in a 29 Outlaw.
Dock Holiday is offline  
Reply
Old 10-13-2006 | 12:51 PM
  #103  
JasonSmith's Avatar
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,333
Likes: 5
From: USA
Default Re: Baja History "The Thread"

Originally Posted by StillHaulin@61
Jason
Some of us ride with our wives & grandchildren
Bill
Hey, I had a wife & I have a 3 year old little girl. They both rode with me. Check out the video in my signature. My kid says it all. I got twins baby!
JasonSmith is offline  
Reply
Old 10-13-2006 | 12:52 PM
  #104  
Dock Holiday's Avatar
Thread Starter
Charter Member #34
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 7,151
Likes: 2
From: Beautiful North Carolina
Default Re: Baja History "The Thread"

Originally Posted by StillHaulin@61
Jason
Some of us ride with our wives & grandchildren
Bill
Bill,

If you just want a big nice riding boat and speed is not an issue I would not spend the money for the 500, 525 or the 600. You will NEVER see it back out of that boat and it will still not be that fast. Just stick with a 496HO and have the difference for a lifetime worth of fuel.

Dock
Dock Holiday is offline  
Reply
Old 10-13-2006 | 01:00 PM
  #105  
SuperTramp's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
Default Re: Baja History "The Thread"

thanks guys, im still shoping.
SuperTramp is offline  
Reply
Old 10-13-2006 | 01:05 PM
  #106  
StillHaulin@63's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 361
Likes: 0
From: California
Default Re: Baja History "The Thread"

Originally Posted by JasonSmith
Hey, I had a wife & I have a 3 year old little girl. They both rode with me. Check out the video in my signature. My kid says it all. I got twins baby!
Good for you .....
Your little girl will keep you young ..... and make you old before your time!
StillHaulin@63 is offline  
Reply
Old 10-13-2006 | 01:10 PM
  #107  
StillHaulin@63's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 361
Likes: 0
From: California
Default Re: Baja History "The Thread"

Originally Posted by Dock Holiday
Bill,
If you just want a big nice riding boat and speed is not an issue I would not spend the money for the 500, 525 or the 600. You will NEVER see it back out of that boat and it will still not be that fast. Just stick with a 496HO and have the difference for a lifetime worth of fuel.
Dock
Dock
Your probably right as the whole concept is an affordable cost for operating it. I suspect there's a lot of folks who would be thrilled with the ride of a 29' hull without the expense of running twins.
Roughly, how much more does a 29OL weigh compared to a 272?
StillHaulin@63 is offline  
Reply
Old 10-13-2006 | 01:52 PM
  #108  
Dock Holiday's Avatar
Thread Starter
Charter Member #34
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 7,151
Likes: 2
From: Beautiful North Carolina
Default Re: Baja History "The Thread"

Originally Posted by StillHaulin@61
Roughly, how much more does a 29OL weigh compared to a 272?

272 Dry Weight = 4400 lbs

29 OL Single Dry Weight = 5575 Lbs
29 OL Twin Dry Weight = 6800 lbs

The 29 is a much larger boat, it punches a much bigger whole through the air and has more wetted surface by far.
Dock Holiday is offline  
Reply
Old 10-13-2006 | 01:59 PM
  #109  
StillHaulin@63's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 361
Likes: 0
From: California
Default Re: Baja History "The Thread"

Originally Posted by Dock Holiday
272 Dry Weight = 4400 lbs
29 OL Single Dry Weight = 5575 Lbs
29 OL Twin Dry Weight = 6800 lbs

The 29 is a much larger boat, it punches a much bigger whole through the air and has more wetted surface by far.
Thanks Dock ...
That's probably too much hull to be pushed around by 400-500hp.
And as my son reminded me, you would only buy a Baja to go fast,
..... otherwise get a Tollycraft
StillHaulin@63 is offline  
Reply
Old 10-14-2006 | 12:03 PM
  #110  
TEAMBAJA's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 6,636
Likes: 0
From: Bucyrus, Ohio
Default Re: Baja History "The Thread"

There were a few single engine 292 Islanders for sale awhile back. Havent seen any in awhile.
TEAMBAJA is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.