33OL w/ 496HO's
02-03-2012, 12:37 PM
#21
VIP Member
VIP Member
I think the 30 has a better cabin. Thats one of the reasons I´m looking for a 35. Stringer outlaws may be great boats but I dont like the interior. 2 useless couches you cant sleep in and they cant be transformed into a bed. The small space in the front is also a bit to small to sleep in.
Other than that I think the 33 i more bang for the buck.
Other than that I think the 33 i more bang for the buck.
It does have a bigger bed ( than the std cuddy) though...and it's quite suitable for sleeping, or passing out, whichever comes first
02-03-2012, 05:55 PM
#23
Registered
iTrader: (5)
J T's boat is sweeet! Mine is similar. I Run a slower prop then him and I think I have more ponies under the hatch (even though I believe his 575's are not stock?) 
Easily cruise at 60 and run mid 90's, fully loaded, full of fuel, 6 people, etc. Still searching for a drive to hold up to some aggressive prop testing to break over the 100mph mark!
This thread helps to keep me motivated in my build!
Easily cruise at 60 and run mid 90's, fully loaded, full of fuel, 6 people, etc. Still searching for a drive to hold up to some aggressive prop testing to break over the 100mph mark!
This thread helps to keep me motivated in my build!
02-03-2012, 05:59 PM
#24
Registered
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Michigan
Posts: 1,449
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
02-03-2012, 06:44 PM
#25
Registered
iTrader: (5)
Boat has stellings boxes and broken Extreme Advantage IMCO SC's 
#6 will not fit unless using a NXT Transom assembly (which houses the transmission in the stand off box)....need to move the engines forward aprox 1". Cut larger hole, and fill the lower part of the bravo hole in. Very expensive, to much work.
BMAX upper is strong, the lower uses XR gears, so not enough advantage over the SC IMO, (besides better customer service)
Arneson Bravo conversion is my favorite so far....
X-Power is sweet but to much money
The new SCX-4 might be an option, waiting to see how they work out, been waiting and waiting or would have already bought one of the other options!!!
Might just give up my research and install standard upper and lower SCX drives. Strong but slower then the other options...........
#6 will not fit unless using a NXT Transom assembly (which houses the transmission in the stand off box)....need to move the engines forward aprox 1". Cut larger hole, and fill the lower part of the bravo hole in. Very expensive, to much work.
BMAX upper is strong, the lower uses XR gears, so not enough advantage over the SC IMO, (besides better customer service)
Arneson Bravo conversion is my favorite so far....
X-Power is sweet but to much money
The new SCX-4 might be an option, waiting to see how they work out, been waiting and waiting or would have already bought one of the other options!!!
Might just give up my research and install standard upper and lower SCX drives. Strong but slower then the other options...........
02-04-2012, 04:07 AM
#26
Registered
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 166
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Actually, if there is some sort of sleep worthy bed I´d love to have that netting seats.
02-04-2012, 11:24 AM
#27
VIP Member
VIP Member
lead to efficient cruise speeds) top end: 88-92 on average.
Adding a 1" piece of egg crate foam padding under the the V berth padding makes a world of difference.
02-04-2012, 12:38 PM
#28
Custom Interiors & More
iTrader: (1)
They're right, the 33 is the best hull Baja made. I had a 33 w 500efi's and it ran 78. I traded it on a 36OL and I wished that I didn't.
The 33 hull rode better, better balance and felt quicker to respond.
Also, I could never seem to balance the 36 side to side. I was always adjusting the tabs so that it would ride level side to side. Also the 33 came up on plane alot quicker.
The 33 hull rode better, better balance and felt quicker to respond.
Also, I could never seem to balance the 36 side to side. I was always adjusting the tabs so that it would ride level side to side. Also the 33 came up on plane alot quicker.
XT
02-04-2012, 06:15 PM
#29
Registered
iTrader: (5)
That is exactly what I hated about the 36 hull. The 36 has a much more rockered hull design and you really need the nose in the air to make them run fast. That is why the netting cuddy worked better in the 36ol than the 33! If I had to choose my favorite it would be between the 33 and 35 Outlaw. The prototype 35 with HO's would run 74-75 all day long. Now if someone was to add the 35 notched transom to a 33 hull, now we are talking! I think that alone would add 2-3 mph easy. Just my opinion.
XT
XT
Great minds must think a like!!!
Now if only you could help me pick out drives.....
02-04-2012, 06:29 PM
#30
Registered
iTrader: (5)
Pics of the "Team Baja" poker run style cabin in my boat....JayTee's prob is similar.
The cushions even have their own carrying case so you can remove them and gain another .000002 mph!
Personally I really like the cabin. The V-Birth is larger like JT said. Lots of storage. The Simpson netting seats are actually comfortable. I believe there are additional bulkheads also?
The cushions even have their own carrying case so you can remove them and gain another .000002 mph!
Personally I really like the cabin. The V-Birth is larger like JT said. Lots of storage. The Simpson netting seats are actually comfortable. I believe there are additional bulkheads also?
