454 with 177 blower build
#191
That's going to be a rocket ship. What did it run prior with the old setup? Not a direct comparison, but the 27 Fountain that I have driven would get a little get a little loose mid 70's and straighten out 80's-90's mph.
#192
Registered
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 621
Likes: 0
From: Newark, DE
#193
Registered
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 621
Likes: 0
From: Newark, DE
#194
Registered
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 621
Likes: 0
From: Newark, DE
Anyone care to take a guess at my hp? I've never dynoed my engines but know they make good power because they can push a 1988 panther into the ninties. I always assumed in the area of 650hp but looking at some of these builds and hp it could be more.
6055 edelbrock rectangle heads
9.5:1 static compression
8.2 dynamic compression
731 cam
6psi at 5400rpm
1050 dominator
468cid
6055 edelbrock rectangle heads
9.5:1 static compression
8.2 dynamic compression
731 cam
6psi at 5400rpm
1050 dominator
468cid
#195
Registered
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 621
Likes: 0
From: Newark, DE
My builder and dyno guy did a 525sc upgrade in a 92 27 fever which wasn't a stepped hull, it made 688hp, and the boat pushed 90 here on the bay they said. My goal was to break 80mph at its worst, I thought that would take 650hp, I was wrong, and we over shot that anyway lol. Im not sure what it will run honestly, Im not expecting it to run 90's, probably mid to upper 80's I would guess.
#197
Registered
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 621
Likes: 0
From: Newark, DE
Oh but the owner committed to running 92 lol. I just saw no reason for jacking the compression up like that on a steal headed 500hp motor, its just completely unecessary, and he is doing his client a dis service, he is taking all other options away from the owner for future hp upgrades besides for NA. A procharger set up would be the best way to go to make power with that induction and to retain fuel injection, but thats way out the window now, not even an option. But then again no way I would trust that builder to put a pro charger on it lol
#198
Oh but the owner committed to running 92 lol. I just saw no reason for jacking the compression up like that on a steal headed 500hp motor, its just completely unecessary, and he is doing his client a dis service, he is taking all other options away from the owner for future hp upgrades besides for NA. A procharger set up would be the best way to go to make power with that induction and to retain fuel injection, but thats way out the window now, not even an option. But then again no way I would trust that builder to put a pro charger on it lol
#199
Registered
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 2,497
Likes: 4
From: PA/MD
I have to bite my tongue on almost every build spec I see from that "builder" because I don't like to cause trouble. But holycrap sometimes I just can't help myself. I looked that cam up and its the roller equivalent of a 330hp cam, .480 lift. On 10.5:1 compression... smh. .


#200
Registered
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 621
Likes: 0
From: Newark, DE
I have to bite my tongue on almost every build spec I see from that "builder" because I don't like to cause trouble. But holycrap sometimes I just can't help myself. I looked that cam up and its the roller equivalent of a 330hp cam, .480 lift. On 10.5:1 compression... smh. .



