Notices

454 with 177 blower build

Thread Tools
 
Old 04-11-2015 | 11:13 AM
  #221  
Thread Starter
Registered
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 458
Likes: 0
From: Las Vegas, NV
Default

No wideband, used the dyno calculation. I'm not familiar with this....so what does the 100hp correction factor mean in my numbers?
ramos45 is offline  
Reply
Old 04-11-2015 | 11:19 AM
  #222  
Thread Starter
Registered
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 458
Likes: 0
From: Las Vegas, NV
Default

I think I see what you mean...divide fuel flow by bsfc and result is about 100 off from stated hp at that rpm. Is this what you mean?
ramos45 is offline  
Reply
Old 04-11-2015 | 11:21 AM
  #223  
SB
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 14,094
Likes: 3,684
From: On A Dirt Floor
Default

What town + state was it dyno'd in (you don't have to mention the shop)
SB is offline  
Reply
Old 04-11-2015 | 11:31 AM
  #224  
Thread Starter
Registered
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 458
Likes: 0
From: Las Vegas, NV
Default

Originally Posted by SB
What town + state was it dyno'd in (you don't have to mention the shop)
My sig
ramos45 is offline  
Reply
Old 04-11-2015 | 11:37 AM
  #225  
SB
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 14,094
Likes: 3,684
From: On A Dirt Floor
Default

The Las Vegas strip is around 2200FT above sea level. Shop around the same ?
SB is offline  
Reply
Old 04-11-2015 | 11:44 AM
  #226  
Thread Starter
Registered
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 458
Likes: 0
From: Las Vegas, NV
Default

Shop is at the speedway so maybe a tad higher in elevation
ramos45 is offline  
Reply
Old 04-11-2015 | 11:52 AM
  #227  
SB
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 14,094
Likes: 3,684
From: On A Dirt Floor
Default

Las Vegas Motor Speedway is 1960-2020 feet depending on reports. LOl. I'm sure the property isn't perfectly flat lol, and thus why. So, 2000ft it is.

Quick look at a small smapling of racers data from the dragway looks like density altitude usually ranges from 2000-3600ft.
SB is offline  
Reply
Old 04-11-2015 | 11:57 AM
  #228  
Thread Starter
Registered
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 458
Likes: 0
From: Las Vegas, NV
Default

Hmm, I would of thought higher due to the view but guess not.
ramos45 is offline  
Reply
Old 04-11-2015 | 07:42 PM
  #229  
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 11,332
Likes: 73
From: chicago
Default

So, the AFR readings on that dyno sheet, were provided from a calulation, rather than an oxygen sensor?

Did they make jetting changes to the carbs while making pulls?

While you are at a higher altitude, your boost level seems to be very good, for that engine combo/pulley combo/blower combo. I'd be willing to bet your fuel mixture is less than ideal.
MILD THUNDER is offline  
Reply
Old 04-11-2015 | 07:52 PM
  #230  
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 11,332
Likes: 73
From: chicago
Default

Your initial pull that you had sent me, made more power, than the final pull, with a higher LB/HR reading of fuel consumption.

18FT lbs less at 4000, and 6HP less at 5700.
Attached Thumbnails 454 with 177 blower build-img_0998.jpg   454 with 177 blower build-supercharger-dyno_page_1.jpg  
MILD THUNDER is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.