Offshoreonly.com

Offshoreonly.com (https://www.offshoreonly.com/forums/)
-   Drives and Lower Units (https://www.offshoreonly.com/forums/drives-lower-units-217/)
-   -   IMCO SCX failures ?? (https://www.offshoreonly.com/forums/drives-lower-units/217748-imco-scx-failures.html)

CB-BLR 09-29-2009 11:49 PM

[QUOTE=DonRoc;2963295]

Originally Posted by CB-BLR (Post 2963252)


I know its one piece. Are you saying they do not make a upper to go with there -3 lower? Like the SC extreme they make an upper to mate to there -3 lower. I will have to call them in the morning.
Thanks

Don

The SC upper is a two piece affair. When used with a -3 SC lower, a special -1 mid-section must be used on the SC upper. Since the SCX is a one piece casting, there is no such "mid-section".

The SCX upper was originally intended to be used with the SCX lower, which at this time only comes in a -2 configuration. IF you want it lower than that, you have to use the SCX spacers which come in lengths up to +3.

Because of the enlarged gears in the SCX lower, it is proving to not be very efficient except when used as a surfacing drive.

IMCO wisely decided to make the SCX upper compatible with their existing SC lower sections. The only thing you need, is to put a conversion down shaft into the lower. They make these conversion shafts in standard thru +3 lengths.

So.. not only is there no -1 mid body in the SCX to accomidate the clearances needed for a prop when using the -3 lower, there is also no -1 conversion shaft made.

Hope this helps,

Chris

DonRoc 09-30-2009 06:55 PM

I hope they make a case and componets to accommodate the -3 or make a -3 SCX complete. In the near future. I can not go deeper than i am now, in fact would love to go hgher.
Thanks,
Don
Glen Harbor Marina

CB-BLR 10-01-2009 12:18 AM

Don,

You should probably call IMCO in California and ask them about a shorter SCX... but my understanding is that they are not persuing that at this time.

From talking to them today...They are looking into making the SCX lower more hydrodynamic by using somewhat smaller gears in the lower and making the lower faster. For now we will just have to settle with the SC lower if we want speed, or the SCX lower if we want reliability.

IMCO claims that they have yet to see a broken set of SCX gears. Apparently there were some shifting issues with the first release units due to breaking shift cams, but that has been fixed with a new billett piece.

On your boat.. there is always the possibility of raising the motor some. I have heard that you can raise it an inch without re-cutting the transom.

Hope this helps,

Chris

Philm 10-01-2009 01:19 AM

Don cant raise his drive anymore. He just reglassed the hole in the transom and raised his ITS box to 1/4" from the swim platform and raised the engine to match. He already has a -3" lower.

I forget how much you raised it Don, must of been at least 2.5-3" right?

CB-BLR 10-01-2009 01:29 AM


Originally Posted by Philm (Post 2964080)
Don cant raise his drive anymore. He just reglassed the hole in the transom and raised his ITS box to 1/4" from the swim platform and raised the engine to match. He already has a -3" lower.

I forget how much you raised it Don, must of been at least 2.5-3" right?

Bummer...

Back to the question at hand... anyone have comments on the SCX drive?

Chris

Panther 10-01-2009 08:51 AM

what's the warranty on the SCX?

CB-BLR 10-01-2009 09:35 AM


Originally Posted by Panther (Post 2964163)
what's the warranty on the SCX?

Great question... I will check on that today.

Chris

Panther 10-01-2009 09:57 AM

And pricing too!! :)

johnlomant 10-01-2009 12:11 PM

1 year with 700 hp

2112 10-01-2009 10:10 PM


Originally Posted by Panther (Post 2964216)
And pricing too!! :)

+1
.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:43 PM.


Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.