![]() |
Where am I hiding from this? I have said on multiple posts that if it comes to pass that Formula messed up, that I will jump all over them. and yes, if there are actual facts that prove an issue on Formula's part, I will post them on Boatfreaks. (which BTY isn't "my" site)
5 of 5 boats, and ONE picture that doesn't really show much. If I had a boat with a hull/deck joint failure, I'd have tons of pictures of the lack of Plexus, and the repair process. The response from Formula that is printed below is pretty clear on what they think. Their boats are great, but like every boat, thye can make them better. There are tons of boats out there that use just screws and sealer to hold the deck to the hull. So Formula is heads above them already.
Originally Posted by PhantomChaos
(Post 3322239)
Z5.....go ahead and bury your head in the sand. Five of Five boats. I'm sure we'll see more boats in our own club this year. No broken fiberglass.......hull/deck needs repair. I'll get you some more pics okay? You can post them on your on your own BoatFreak site if you want.
Here are the last contacts with Formula I have had........and for those without PDF: Norton, Sorry for the delay in responding. Yes, I reviewed both boats while visiting Archer and had discussions with Dan and Dave relative to production line manufacturing in general and the deck/hull joint assembly specifically, i.e., how the assembly has evolved and improved through the years. I also shared with Dan some of our testing and experimentation and the changes in manufacturing that have resulted largely due to the inquiries of you and your fellow SCOPE members. As to my impressions when looking at the boats first hand, I did not see anything that surprised me, i.e., given the previous descriptions and discussions of the issue. Was there room for improvement in both the design and implementation of the joint assemblies? Yes, on both accounts. However, I do not attribute the issues to defects per se. I believe a combination of factors contributed to the joints' separation, and I feel our offers of participation toward the repairs is commensurate with this position. As a production line manufacturer, we work within certain parameters and limitations, and the reality is we build our boats to general standards that may prove insufficient durability-wise when exposed long-term to more severe conditions and applications. What we've seen happen with your boats doesn't mean the deck/hull joint was defective; it does mean we need to make improvements (and we have) if we wish our boats to stand up better over time in offshore-type conditions. Let me know if you have any other questions. Regards, Michael R. Boyd |
Originally Posted by PhantomChaos
(Post 3322241)
Bottom line is.....I believe there is a safety issue here, and Fomula is not issuing an inspection bulletin or anything. That is why this thead is here.
|
I don't think that Formula depreciates faster then other boats. The resale did take a hit while they did their no interest for X months and what ever else they did to get people to buy. Cigs, OL, Nortecs all start out at a MUCH higher price so they will resell higher. Formula has their loyal fallowing as does Cig. and so on. If you want a boat that holds its value better then any it would probably be a Superboat or a Pantera. Hell Specialized racing has won 3 world champions with a boat that is 24 years old! Superboat owners/buyers are like a cult. The just hold their value like nothing I have ever seen.
Zone 5. I think that Norts concern (and I hope that I am not putting words into his mouth), that he has said multiple times, is that he brought this out because he wants other owners to be aware of the possible issue and to keep a close eye out for it. Will all boats have this issue, I doubt it, but 5 out of 5 of the boats on the west coast that he boats with did. Now maybe because the first guy had the issue the other 4 checked their boats to find the same issue? Maybe now that other people are going to know about the possibility we will hear of others. IMO Formula makes a good boat, but they have often times made HUGE errors in construction. Some examples of this is not capping bulkheads with glass, how many people have had to replace their transoms on their 311's and other boats. This could be another manufacturing issue. Maybe they have fixed it already maybe not. Lets just all be aware that the issue exists on SOME boats and as owners do out part to keep an eye on our boats. |
Gunfight
Norts intent was not to incite a riot or gunfight. It seems that this thread is getting a little hostile. Believe me I have photos and videos. I also have videos and photos of the system Archer developed to to the repairs. I am hesitant to post all this because it will add gas to the fire and really is not necesscary. Our intent is to make owners aware of the issue, PERIOD. We could have turned this into a gangfight lawsuit but we did not. We have better things to do and in our cases there were no injuries or accidents. THATS ALL. If you do have a failure I will be glad to E-mail you the repair video and procedure free of charge.
|
this still scares me this is my last boat
|
Originally Posted by fossil fuel
(Post 3322702)
Norts intent was not to incite a riot or gunfight. It seems that this thread is getting a little hostile. Believe me I have photos and videos. I also have videos and photos of the system Archer developed to to the repairs. I am hesitant to post all this because it will add gas to the fire and really is not necesscary. Our intent is to make owners aware of the issue, PERIOD. We could have turned this into a gangfight lawsuit but we did not. We have better things to do and in our cases there were no injuries or accidents. THATS ALL. If you do have a failure I will be glad to E-mail you the repair video and procedure free of charge.
I would post them,if you don't want to could you send them to me.I will not post them but would like to see them. |
I would like to see the repair procedure. Maybe I will do my 311 differently. [email protected]
Thanks |
We did ours three years ago , Thought it was because it was run hard and it is a 96 !!!!!!!!!!!!!!
|
Originally Posted by formula 382 sr-1
(Post 3322866)
We did ours three years ago , Thought it was because it was run hard and it is a 96 !!!!!!!!!!!!!!
And then there were six. |
Does anyone have any objection if I go through and clean out any of the banter that does not specifically relate to this topic? I think that with this looking like it may be more serious then we thought it is important that we keep it 100% on topic. Mostly I am thinking get rid of all the financing stuff?
Jon |
Originally Posted by formula 382 sr-1
(Post 3322866)
We did ours three years ago , Thought it was because it was run hard and it is a 96 !!!!!!!!!!!!!!
|
Originally Posted by Audiofn
(Post 3322877)
Does anyone have any objection if I go through and clean out any of the banter that does not specifically relate to this topic? I think that with this looking like it may be more serious then we thought it is important that we keep it 100% on topic. Mostly I am thinking get rid of all the financing stuff?
Jon |
Originally Posted by fossil fuel
(Post 3322702)
Norts intent was not to incite a riot or gunfight. It seems that this thread is getting a little hostile. Believe me I have photos and videos. I also have videos and photos of the system Archer developed to to the repairs. I am hesitant to post all this because it will add gas to the fire and really is not necesscary. Our intent is to make owners aware of the issue, PERIOD. We could have turned this into a gangfight lawsuit but we did not. We have better things to do and in our cases there were no injuries or accidents. THATS ALL. If you do have a failure I will be glad to E-mail you the repair video and procedure free of charge.
In all honesty, pics and video are a good thing. If you can show people the exact issues that you have found, thats a good thing. Its not going to add fuel to the fire, if it shows issues with Formula's construction. |
Originally Posted by Zone 5
(Post 3322889)
1996 is before Plexus.
|
|
Originally Posted by Audiofn
(Post 3322877)
Does anyone have any objection if I go through and clean out any of the banter that does not specifically relate to this topic? I think that with this looking like it may be more serious then we thought it is important that we keep it 100% on topic. Mostly I am thinking get rid of all the financing stuff?
Jon Agreed Jon,it was just a side topic that I brought up I replied because I was asked.It should have been done by PM. The rest should stay |
So if you look in the side storage compartments what is it you'll be looking for? Gaps? Plexis squeezed out? Or do you have to pull the rub rail off?
Does this come down to a surface prep issue on some boats? |
1998 353 fastek. Wet inside cabin also. Never investigated why. Boat had low hours on it.
|
Originally Posted by formula 382 sr-1
(Post 3322902)
Don't know about that but it came apart and water was coming in the boat in a following sea !!!!
|
Number one indicator is a loose rub rail from the center of the boat forward. If this is loose, give the hull a solid push with your hand a few inches below the loose rail. If the hull flexes in ANY you should pull the rail and look further. When they are intact the hull will not flex at this point. It is solid. Pulling the rail is pretty easy. There are screws and every 18" 1/4 20 bolt and nut. The bolt and nut are screwed through a small square plate on the inside. The speaker covers in the cabin come down with two screws and allow you access to almost all the nuts. A few are a strech but do able. When the rail is really loose as a result of a seam failure most of the 1/4 20 bolts will be sheared off. Thats when the fun starts to chase these out so the new ones can be installed in the same plate. This is not a end of the world fix and no paint work is required if you are careful.
|
Originally Posted by Back4More
(Post 3322916)
So if you look in the side storage compartments what is it you'll be looking for? Gaps? Plexis squeezed out? Or do you have to pull the rub rail off?
Does this come down to a surface prep issue on some boats? |
Originally Posted by fossil fuel
(Post 3322940)
This is not a end of the world fix and no paint work is required if you are careful.
|
Remove all the bolts, remove all the plexus, Re apply plexus in a liberal amount, reinstall squeeze bolts and resqueeze to plexus recommended amount. When finished we had plex squeezing out of the seam inside and out. I would estimate we had 3 times the material in the seam than we took out. See the first few pages of this thread on the plex. Thanks, Dave
|
Dave, Back a few pages you said that there was to be a .05" layer of plexus left after you bolt the hull halfs. How did you accomplish this? Do you know if they used feeler guages or some type of spacer? I would assume that if you just tightened the bolts that you would squeeze most of it out?
Thanks Jon |
Originally Posted by Audiofn
(Post 3322877)
Does anyone have any objection if I go through and clean out any of the banter that does not specifically relate to this topic? I think that with this looking like it may be more serious then we thought it is important that we keep it 100% on topic. Mostly I am thinking get rid of all the financing stuff?
Jon Actually I did not intend to answer the financing part any more in this thread, and genereally speaking I am all for keep threads "clean" and stick to the subject, but since Expensive Date has made the same comment in other threads too, I wanted to check if he can substantiate, what I believe is his point of view, as opposed to fact. I don't object to deleting all the financing stuff including my comments, as long as Expensive Date's original comment about Formula not holding their value is deleted too. If that comment is not deleted, I will object. |
There seem to be many different Plexus adhesives, anybody that knows the specific product that is used for the deck bonding ?
|
Shouldn't you somehow bind the deck and hull together to allow for a tight seal? Not sure how you can do this.
|
Originally Posted by Phazar454Mag
(Post 3323186)
There seem to be many different Plexus adhesives, anybody that knows the specific product that is used for the deck bonding ?
Maybe it is on this list: http://www.itwplexus.com/UserFiles/F...ectorGuide.pdf |
I will look at the tubes. It is the same product number that Formula uses. Before we applied it to the seam we ran some tests on old fiberglass scraps we had laying around the shop. We tested it on dirty panels with no cleaning other that wipe off the dust with a rag, We sanded a panel and one we just scraped. The next day we broke them apart. All of the panels ripped to the structural mat ! It seems the plex penetrates the gel coat as advertised. It did not matter dirty or clean. I think this is why you need to leave 1/8" in the seam so it has the chemistry to work.
|
Originally Posted by fossil fuel
(Post 3323371)
I will look at the tubes. It is the same product number that Formula uses. Before we applied it to the seam we ran some tests on old fiberglass scraps we had laying around the shop. We tested it on dirty panels with no cleaning other that wipe off the dust with a rag, We sanded a panel and one we just scraped. The next day we broke them apart. All of the panels ripped to the structural mat ! It seems the plex penetrates the gel coat as advertised. It did not matter dirty or clean. I think this is why you need to leave 1/8" in the seam so it has the chemistry to work.
|
I would say that in areas the plex was oversqueezed to the point of only a thin amount was left, in some areas there was not enough applied. BUT.......this is only according to the info I have read about the product. I am merely a 382 owner, engineer and a dad. What do I know...The proof will be in a few years down the road if these boats have no more issues.
|
3 Attachment(s)
Originally Posted by fossil fuel
(Post 3322950)
Remove all the bolts, remove all the plexus, Re apply plexus in a liberal amount, reinstall squeeze bolts and resqueeze to plexus recommended amount. When finished we had plex squeezing out of the seam inside and out. I would estimate we had 3 times the material in the seam than we took out. See the first few pages of this thread on the plex. Thanks, Dave
|
Photos
As you can see from the seam photo there is a single bead of plex that was not compressed. The plunge cutter worked really slick to remove the old plex. The knife blade could be bent slightly to cut the material from under the deck. It flexed enough to take out the plex and not the fiberglass. The 1/2 round cutter was more aggressive on the hull side of the seam as shown on the video. We packed the joint full of plex and forced it up into the seam with a bondo paddle. When the joint was compressed with the screws it pushed out inside and out. I know for sure there are no voids.
|
Originally Posted by fossil fuel
(Post 3323446)
As you can see from the seam photo there is a single bead of plex that was not compressed. The plunge cutter worked really slick to remove the old plex. The knife blade could be bent slightly to cut the material from under the deck. It flexed enough to take out the plex and not the fiberglass. The 1/2 round cutter was more aggressive on the hull side of the seam as shown on the video. We packed the joint full of plex and forced it up into the seam with a bondo paddle. When the joint was compressed with the screws it pushed out inside and out. I know for sure there are no voids.
I believe this is also the cause of water in the cabin that has been asked about many times.There are probably hulls out there that have not separated but are not sealed.And this is were the water is coming in. |
Originally Posted by VtSteve
(Post 3323190)
Shouldn't you somehow bind the deck and hull together to allow for a tight seal? Not sure how you can do this.
|
Originally Posted by fossil fuel
(Post 3323446)
As you can see from the seam photo there is a single bead of plex that was not compressed. The plunge cutter worked really slick to remove the old plex. The knife blade could be bent slightly to cut the material from under the deck. It flexed enough to take out the plex and not the fiberglass. The 1/2 round cutter was more aggressive on the hull side of the seam as shown on the video. We packed the joint full of plex and forced it up into the seam with a bondo paddle. When the joint was compressed with the screws it pushed out inside and out. I know for sure there are no voids.
The one on the right with the cutter and the wedge. How much of an overlap is there deck to hull? |
Originally Posted by Zone 5
(Post 3323519)
Could you explain the 2 pictures please. The blury one on the left looks like it has a bead of something on it. Is this a before repair, or after repair?
The one on the right with the cutter and the wedge. How much of an overlap is there deck to hull? As you can see from the seam photo there is a single bead of plex that was not compressed----- Copied from Fossil's post its my understanding it was never compressed and was before repair. |
Originally Posted by Expensive Date
(Post 3323522)
--------------------------------------------------------------
As you can see from the seam photo there is a single bead of plex that was not compressed----- Copied from Fossil's post its my understanding it was never compressed and was before repair. When the joint was compressed with the screws it pushed out inside and out |
The way I read it both pictures were pre repair.Maybe Dave can post so we know for sure.
|
Originally Posted by fossil fuel
(Post 3322950)
Remove all the bolts, remove all the plexus, Re apply plexus in a liberal amount, reinstall squeeze bolts and resqueeze to plexus recommended amount.
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:25 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.