Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > Owners Forum > Formula
The complete 302 thread >

The complete 302 thread

Notices
Formula

The complete 302 thread

Thread Tools
 
Old 08-18-2003 | 10:36 PM
  #21  
Audiofn's Avatar
Charter Member #232
20 Year Member
Charter Member
Super Moderators
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 18,417
Likes: 6
From: Carlisle, MA USA
Default

Things I do not like about the boat.

Rigging was not all that great back then. They could have done a nicer job and had better locations for things (I have done a lot of this on my boat)

The deck is way to flexable for my liking. It does not seem to cause any ill effect to the boat but it is wierd walking on a deck that flexes as much as this thing does.

They did not bond the deck to the hull or bulkheads. This causes the screws to back out all the time. I through bolted mine and also used 5200 to bond the hull halfs.

The bulkheads to the cabin on the earlyer models is wood not glass. Mine move all over the place (yet another project that needs to be addressed
__________________
Put your best foot forward!
Audiofn is offline  
Reply
Old 08-18-2003 | 10:38 PM
  #22  
Audiofn's Avatar
Charter Member #232
20 Year Member
Charter Member
Super Moderators
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 18,417
Likes: 6
From: Carlisle, MA USA
Default

And since my teachers always told me not to leave on a negative note:

The Ride on this boat is one of the best that I have ever been in of it's size. Not the fastest boat in the world but it seems to always land soft.

LOTS of room. Both in the cabin and cockpit.

Lines. My boat is 24 years old and people still tell me how much they love the look.
__________________
Put your best foot forward!
Audiofn is offline  
Reply
Old 08-19-2003 | 08:22 AM
  #23  
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,254
Likes: 44
From: Toronto Canada
Default

Mine is a 1982 model year and the brouchure lists it at 6950 Lbs dry. To follow up Jon's comments ,for its size the cockpit area is much larger than newer boats and unlike Cuda's year ours have a raised deck which affords alittle more head room in the cabin. But both Jon and Cuda hit it right on the head the boat rides great and still looks great and compared to much newer boats looks and feels bigger. Rick G.
Attached Thumbnails The complete 302 thread-dsc00106-1.jpg  

Last edited by Rick G; 08-19-2003 at 08:25 AM.
Rick G is offline  
Reply
Old 08-19-2003 | 05:55 PM
  #24  
Registered
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,333
Likes: 1
From: Indy, St. Louis, LOTO
Default

At least on the '84 - '86 models the entire rear seat can be slid forward or removed altogether to allow complete access to the front of the engines. There is no bulkhead between the engine compartment and the cockpit other than the back seat.
Chart is offline  
Reply
Old 08-20-2003 | 08:03 PM
  #25  
cuda's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 25,191
Likes: 0
From: Deland, Florida
Default

Originally posted by Chart
At least on the '84 - '86 models the entire rear seat can be slid forward or removed altogether to allow complete access to the front of the engines. There is no bulkhead between the engine compartment and the cockpit other than the back seat.
The only problem with that is after tilting the seat forward, it is rough on the old family jewels to step over it back into the engine area!
cuda is offline  
Reply
Old 08-21-2003 | 06:41 AM
  #26  
groove's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 409
Likes: 0
From: Boston
Default

Anyone know when Formula adopted the McLeod bolster seats?
groove is offline  
Reply
Old 08-21-2003 | 07:10 AM
  #27  
Registered
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,333
Likes: 1
From: Indy, St. Louis, LOTO
Default

Originally posted by cuda
The only problem with that is after tilting the seat forward, it is rough on the old family jewels to step over it back into the engine area!
And after sliding the seat forward, if you lean over it and it tips backwards: That's rough on kinds of body parts.


Groove: I think it was in 1986; of course one year newer that mine.
Chart is offline  
Reply
Old 03-13-2004 | 08:00 PM
  #28  
cuda's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 25,191
Likes: 0
From: Deland, Florida
Default

I thought I'd bring this back to the top. Audio removed his gas tank and found it to be 151 gallons.
Attached Thumbnails The complete 302 thread-cuda-smile-001.jpg  
cuda is offline  
Reply
Old 03-15-2004 | 08:54 AM
  #29  
Audiofn's Avatar
Charter Member #232
20 Year Member
Charter Member
Super Moderators
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 18,417
Likes: 6
From: Carlisle, MA USA
Default

Yup that is what the manufacturer of the tank told me.

Jon
__________________
Put your best foot forward!
Audiofn is offline  
Reply
Old 03-15-2004 | 03:46 PM
  #30  
bford1's Avatar
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 505
Likes: 4
From: San Antonio, TX
Default

Cuda - Are those recent pics? Man, that thing is in awesome condition!

Jon (audiofn) - Thanks for all the recent advise. I'm still trying to get you to send me those little orange buttons. Of course, I know your hands are more than full with your project. But, when you get a chance if you're not going to use them I'd REALLY like to have them. I can't find them anywhere else and I'll send CA$H if you'll tell me what you want for them.

(The pic isn't a 302. But, it does have the little orange buttons.)

Thanks,

Brent
Attached Thumbnails The complete 302 thread-55842718_9.jpg  
bford1 is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.