Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > Owners Forum > Fountain
29 Fever Goods & Bads? Boatless today ! >

29 Fever Goods & Bads? Boatless today !

Notices

29 Fever Goods & Bads? Boatless today !

Thread Tools
 
Old 07-27-2012 | 10:34 AM
  #11  
Registered
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 7,310
Likes: 1,817
From: Merritt Island, FL
Default

Originally Posted by soldier4402
I would not be against twin SBC but resale will kill you and top speed probably isnt any better then low 60's to max 65. I dont know what late models your talking with 6.2s anything pre 2000 is either 454 or 502.
They starting the SBC in them when the new style deck came out.

Nice package, they run around 70, lot more room to work on them then twin BBC, quick to plane and reliable as can be. Talked to one guy and he said pretty good on gas.

Look up boat tests on performance boat . Com, they tested them.

BTW

Latter 32's could be ordered with twin SBC's as well.
Wildman_grafix is offline  
Reply
Old 07-27-2012 | 11:03 AM
  #12  
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 959
Likes: 487
From: Mass
Default

Late models = newer 2004 on I would guess
Early models = older deck/windscreen/no steps/BBC's for twins.
techman is offline  
Reply
Old 07-27-2012 | 11:22 AM
  #13  
Registered
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 2,347
Likes: 4
From: Thousand Islands area
Default

Originally Posted by techman
Late models = newer 2004 on I would guess
Early models = older deck/windscreen/no steps/BBC's for twins.
got ya thats kind of what I was thinking
soldier4402 is offline  
Reply
Old 07-27-2012 | 11:25 AM
  #14  
Registered
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 2,347
Likes: 4
From: Thousand Islands area
Default

Originally Posted by Wildman_grafix
They starting the SBC in them when the new style deck came out.

Nice package, they run around 70, lot more room to work on them then twin BBC, quick to plane and reliable as can be. Talked to one guy and he said pretty good on gas.

Look up boat tests on performance boat . Com, they tested them.

BTW

Latter 32's could be ordered with twin SBC's as well.
thats interesting I cant beleive the speed as a 350mag is rated at around 275-300hp?? Which combined you are losing probably close 200hp compared to a 454. But I guess the weight savings and probably a smaller fuel tank. I guess you could go with alphas too then.

I wouldnt havent minded a package like this even if it went 60-65 as I rarely go above 55 anyways.
soldier4402 is offline  
Reply
Old 07-27-2012 | 03:05 PM
  #15  
NWPC's Avatar
Platinum Member
15 Year Member
Platinum Member
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 230
Likes: 6
From: Entiat, Washington
Default

my stock 575sci jumps on plane, is faster then a 525 boat and has better low and mid range crusing speeds.
That is what I would call the best set up for a single 29.\
525 / XR is a great option, just not the best offered for this boat.
NWPC is offline  
Reply
Old 07-27-2012 | 03:33 PM
  #16  
Mark D's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 169
Likes: 1
From: Seattle, Washington
Default

Originally Posted by NWPC
my stock 575sci jumps on plane, is faster then a 525 boat and has better low and mid range crusing speeds.
That is what I would call the best set up for a single 29.\
525 / XR is a great option, just not the best offered for this boat.
My comments on HP525 being the best overall package took in consideration the complete picture; where you get awesome single engine performance on 87 octane...
At least we all agree its a cool boat.
Mark D is offline  
Reply
Old 07-27-2012 | 04:03 PM
  #17  
Registered
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 710
Likes: 1
From: Cincinnati, OH
Default

Originally Posted by soldier4402
thats interesting I cant beleive the speed as a 350mag is rated at around 275-300hp?? Which combined you are losing probably close 200hp compared to a 454. But I guess the weight savings and probably a smaller fuel tank. I guess you could go with alphas too then.

I wouldnt havent minded a package like this even if it went 60-65 as I rarely go above 55 anyways.
70 mph would be the twin 6.2's (320 hp each). The weight of that extra propulsion package (engine, exhaust, drive, transom assy, etc) is right at 1044 lbs - kinda like adding 5 extra people inside your boat, compared to the single engine boat. Merc typically put Bravo 1 drives behind the 350 mag for reliability. They typically used the alpha with the standard 5.7.
A single engine boat with the same total hp (640 hp) would be a mid 80's mph boat.

The 575 SCi boats do seem to plane quicker than the 525 EFI boats (I had one of each). Can't imagine how sluggish one of the new style 29's would be with the 496HO or even a 500 EFI. We had a 2000 29, old deck style, with a 500 EFI and it was noticably sluggish getting on plane, tabs down, drive tucked in.

A 32 with twin 6.2's would probably be as much fun as a corvette with a 4 cyliner in it .

Last edited by bob_t; 07-27-2012 at 04:40 PM.
bob_t is offline  
Reply
Old 07-27-2012 | 05:45 PM
  #18  
NWPC's Avatar
Platinum Member
15 Year Member
Platinum Member
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 230
Likes: 6
From: Entiat, Washington
Default

Any 525 boats running 5 blades? Any better low end?
NWPC is offline  
Reply
Old 07-29-2012 | 02:38 PM
  #19  
Registered
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 2,347
Likes: 4
From: Thousand Islands area
Default

Originally Posted by bob_t
70 mph would be the twin 6.2's (320 hp each). The weight of that extra propulsion package (engine, exhaust, drive, transom assy, etc) is right at 1044 lbs - kinda like adding 5 extra people inside your boat, compared to the single engine boat. Merc typically put Bravo 1 drives behind the 350 mag for reliability. They typically used the alpha with the standard 5.7.
A single engine boat with the same total hp (640 hp) would be a mid 80's mph boat.

The 575 SCi boats do seem to plane quicker than the 525 EFI boats (I had one of each). Can't imagine how sluggish one of the new style 29's would be with the 496HO or even a 500 EFI. We had a 2000 29, old deck style, with a 500 EFI and it was noticably sluggish getting on plane, tabs down, drive tucked in.

A 32 with twin 6.2's would probably be as much fun as a corvette with a 4 cyliner in it .
I hit 70 with my 454 mags in mine with 385hp each, But I feel as if the boat has more and just dont have it pitched right with the props and think if I did the boat would be about 73-75.

Interesting information you provided. But on the 350 mags if they put Bravos on them the drives would be a wash compared with BBC. How much lighter is a dressed 350 compeared to a 454 or 502, i cant imagine your talking more than a few hundred pounds.

If you go with a big single say a 525 575 etc. You got the bigger drive and bigger engine, i also cant imagine you would be half the weight of a BBC twin set up.
soldier4402 is offline  
Reply
Old 07-29-2012 | 07:39 PM
  #20  
Registered
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 7,310
Likes: 1,817
From: Merritt Island, FL
Default

Originally Posted by soldier4402
I hit 70 with my 454 mags in mine with 385hp each, But I feel as if the boat has more and just dont have it pitched right with the props and think if I did the boat would be about 73-75.

Interesting information you provided. But on the 350 mags if they put Bravos on them the drives would be a wash compared with BBC. How much lighter is a dressed 350 compeared to a 454 or 502, i cant imagine your talking more than a few hundred pounds.

If you go with a big single say a 525 575 etc. You got the bigger drive and bigger engine, i also cant imagine you would be half the weight of a BBC twin set up.
From a quick Internet search the small block would be about 100lbs per motor lighter.

As for twin SBC in a 32, yea I bet they were SLOW.

Solder,

The 525 or 575 are not going to be any heavier then your 454. They are the same base block; the crank and larger pistons would be hard to tell the difference.

As for the drive, it's still a bravo drive.
Wildman_grafix is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.