Notices

single v bottom with #6

Thread Tools
 
Old 08-09-2017, 09:35 PM
  #101  
Registered
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 239
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

there are many ski race boats here in Australia with #6 behind 1350s, 1650s and custom built turbo motors. Most run a 2 speed powerglide transmission to get some low down launch and then shift gears for high speed
Australia is offline  
Old 08-17-2017, 06:08 PM
  #102  
VIP Member
VIP Member
 
Slippery's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: W. Mich.
Posts: 399
Received 84 Likes on 39 Posts
Default #6 on a 21

I was just at the Catalina Ski Race and saw a 21' hull with a Merc 1550 and a PAIR of #6 drives on the back

Check out Aussie ski racing. They run 21' hulls with #6 drives to 120mph sustained down the river while pulling a pair of skiers.

I'll try and post some pics when I get back
Slippery is offline  
Old 12-16-2017, 05:03 AM
  #103  
Registered
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 2,102
Received 833 Likes on 353 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mickeymcclgn
speaking from first hand experience drive height is absolutely critical to get it to perform, too low and it's going to be a dog. Period. Dragging that giant case through the water is like dragging a boat anchor. I've been there done that and wasted more money then I'd like to talk about. On the transom even with the bottom. If it's on a box I'd set the box so you can go even 1 and 2 above. I've ran my 28 2 below 1below even and 1 above. night and day difference in speed and boat attitude all around. The higher it went the better the boat felt and handled and drastically started to go faster. Planing ability never changed much. 1 above slips a hair more getting up but even in Point pleasant testing Saturday it planed in 4-6s. If I wasn't racing it I think I would fill the transom and try even higher but I feel I'm at the point of diminishing returns.

if you're still planing on racing the boat. (Procharger guys right?) I would also go straight to a crash box. It'll help recoup some of the parasitic loss in the drive. I went the transmission route at first and saw solid gains everywhere by eliminating that.

As far as props my boat planes with pretty much any of them. I would be willing to let you try some that I have in various diameters and pitch assuming you are running a RH drive. I have the some of the smallest pitch big shaft props.
Dragging the boat anchor, that’s exactly how my 25 outlaw felt with an imco SCX 2-1/4” below on a 12” ext box. Whippled 509 just didn’t really feel like it had nearly double the 496ho hp that it replaced. So now it looks like Scx-4 is my only option to go higher without transom work. Scx-4 would put me at 1/4” below, on a 12 ext box.

Any ideas on how this might work with a #6 prop? Could I still get bow lift/ trim reaction? Would this be too deep for the scx-4 case and or a #6 prop? I was told planning would be my issue with the scx @ 2-1/4” below but I could jump outta the hole if I wanted to.
IGetWet is offline  
Old 12-17-2017, 09:26 AM
  #104  
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Chesapeake Bay
Posts: 643
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by IGetWet
Dragging the boat anchor, that’s exactly how my 25 outlaw felt with an imco SCX 2-1/4” below on a 12” ext box. Whippled 509 just didn’t really feel like it had nearly double the 496ho hp that it replaced. So now it looks like Scx-4 is my only option to go higher without transom work. Scx-4 would put me at 1/4” below, on a 12 ext box.

Any ideas on how this might work with a #6 prop? Could I still get bow lift/ trim reaction? Would this be too deep for the scx-4 case and or a #6 prop? I was told planning would be my issue with the scx @ 2-1/4” below but I could jump outta the hole if I wanted to.
It feel would work with a 6 prop. Even at 1/4” below I would bet that it would work with a bravo style propeller in the 5 blade variety. If you choose to run a 6 prop you might need to have the diameter in the 16-16.5” range depending on how the boat feels. I have quite Afew smaller pitch 4 blade 6 props that id be willing to let you try or sell you if they work for you. Obviously it’s a big financial decision to buy a Scx4 on a guess but I think going up is going to gain you speed. It’s Just a matter of do you want to redo the transom or do you want to buy another drive.
mickeymcclgn is offline  
Old 12-17-2017, 06:52 PM
  #105  
Registered
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 524
Received 13 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

Unless Konrad has figured out how to make their drives live I’d stay away from them in high hp applications. I installed a pair of konrads in a center console with twin 480 ta mars and they wouldn’t stay together. If they can’t handle that application there is no way the will live in a high perf application with 1000 hp
if I am not mistaken there are some number 6 drives on some
of the Australian ski race boats. I thing those are under 25’
obrien is offline  
Old 12-17-2017, 07:52 PM
  #106  
Registered
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 759
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by IGetWet
Dragging the boat anchor, that’s exactly how my 25 outlaw felt with an imco SCX 2-1/4” below on a 12” ext box. Whippled 509 just didn’t really feel like it had nearly double the 496ho hp that it replaced. So now it looks like Scx-4 is my only option to go higher without transom work. Scx-4 would put me at 1/4” below, on a 12 ext box.

Any ideas on how this might work with a #6 prop? Could I still get bow lift/ trim reaction? Would this be too deep for the scx-4 case and or a #6 prop? I was told planning would be my issue with the scx @ 2-1/4” below but I could jump outta the hole if I wanted to.
Talk to pro27 here on the boards, if you haven't already. He has a 27 Progression with a whippled 525 and an SCX4 running a #6 prop. He can probably get you going in the right direction. I believe he's running an extension box too.
ToMorrow44 is offline  
Old 12-18-2017, 08:33 AM
  #107  
Registered
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 2,102
Received 833 Likes on 353 Posts
Default

I’ve talked with Pro27 a few times and he has been helpful and given me some pointers. Most that I’ve talked to about insist that I should step up to the #6 props otherwise gains could be minimal.

Where are the Australian ski racer x-dimensions or prop shaft in relation to the bottom of there hulls?
IGetWet is offline  
Old 03-05-2018, 03:46 AM
  #108  
Registered
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mickeymcclgn
speaking from first hand experience drive height is absolutely critical to get it to perform, too low and it's going to be a dog. Period. Dragging that giant case through the water is like dragging a boat anchor. I've been there done that and wasted more money then I'd like to talk about. On the transom even with the bottom. If it's on a box I'd set the box so you can go even 1 and 2 above. I've ran my 28 2 below 1below even and 1 above. night and day difference in speed and boat attitude all around. The higher it went the better the boat felt and handled and drastically started to go faster. Planing ability never changed much. 1 above slips a hair more getting up but even in Point pleasant testing Saturday it planed in 4-6s. If I wasn't racing it I think I would fill the transom and try even higher but I feel I'm at the point of diminishing returns.

if you're still planing on racing the boat. (Procharger guys right?) I would also go straight to a crash box. It'll help recoup some of the parasitic loss in the drive. I went the transmission route at first and saw solid gains everywhere by eliminating that.

As far as props my boat planes with pretty much any of them. I would be willing to let you try some that I have in various diameters and pitch assuming you are running a RH drive. I have the some of the smallest pitch big shaft props.
Mickeymcclgn
Have you ran your 28 with a #6?
Was it a non stepped or stepped hull? With notch?
Chris12 is offline  
Old 03-05-2018, 07:39 PM
  #109  
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Chesapeake Bay
Posts: 643
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Chris12
Mickeymcclgn
Have you ran your 28 with a #6?
Was it a non stepped or stepped hull? With notch?
My boat has a #5 on an 18” box non stepped no notch. Race layup but not really light by any stretch just no cabin or liner. Never ran any other drive on it nor driven or ridden in one with a bravo to compare. Been in plenty of single engine bravo boats including Afew 24 panteras just not a 28.
mickeymcclgn is offline  
Old 03-06-2018, 12:52 PM
  #110  
Registered
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mickeymcclgn


My boat has a #5 on an 18” box non stepped no notch. Race layup but not really light by any stretch just no cabin or liner. Never ran any other drive on it nor driven or ridden in one with a bravo to compare. Been in plenty of single engine bravo boats including Afew 24 panteras just not a 28.
What do you think about a #6 on 27ft hull. Propshaft 2" above bottom too? Hull is non stepped but with 8" deep notch.
Chris12 is offline  


Quick Reply: single v bottom with #6


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.