Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > General Discussion > General Boating Discussion
Diesel High Performance package-Is there Demand? >

Diesel High Performance package-Is there Demand?

Notices

Diesel High Performance package-Is there Demand?

Thread Tools
 
Old 11-21-2007, 11:40 AM
  #101  
Registered
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Sunland, CA
Posts: 377
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Multi-speed transmissions have their place in high HP diesels

Originally Posted by DonziJapan
Buddy your trying to re invent the wheel. The idea of using a multi speed transmission on boats has been around since dirt was invented. The only actual use that has been developed is low speed maneuvering in go fast boats. Mercruiser sold some of those but in the end the pluses didn't out weigh the cost. Your up against the law of physics here. It takes a certain amount of energy to push a boat a certain speed. When ya reduce the engine rpms you reduce its energy output. ...
Well, kinda.

With high performance boosted diesels, the powerband is quite narrow. That is why truckers have so many gears in their trucks.

On the bigger high HP powerplants, one needs to run in the high turbo boost range, at the low RPM range, so its got the power and the ability to still burn the fuel and to use a long stroke without exceeding the tensile strength of the connecting rods and crankshaft.

Therefore, on racing diesels in Europe, multi-speed gearboxes are always used, and have been for well over a decade.

On gas engines, DonziJapan, you are closer to being correct: multi-speed gearboxes have pretty much been proven to be a waste of time in pleasure boat applications. However, they are not in gas powered offshore race boats because of rules, not ineffectiveness. They have been used offshore, and were then outlawed in the US circuits (not overseas). Plenty of flat bottom race boats use multi-speed transmissions.

And on commercially available diesels, multi-speed transmissions may be a waste of time because the companies try hard to have a very flat and wide powerband so they will work without multi-speed transmissions. Fuel efficiency is lost however: the new Yanmar BMW engines have disappointing HP per GPH numbers to support the high RPM needed to avoid gearboxes: they give up about 30% in the efficiency department over long stroke diesels.

But if designed for a 5 speed transmission, the high HP diesels can make a lot more power while still having a long stroke for high fuel efficiency.
carcrash is offline  
Old 11-21-2007, 12:04 PM
  #102  
Registered
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Sunland, CA
Posts: 377
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by rbr2328
I talked to my Cat engine rep today and he said Caterpillar has no interest in the performance boat market. he said they experimented with it in the 80's with the 3208 TTA's putting out 425-450hp but the demand was not there.
That's a silly statement by a salesman. Those engines were HEAVY, and NOISY, and EXPENSIVE. Simply not a product that worked for the market.
carcrash is offline  
Old 11-22-2007, 10:52 AM
  #103  
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Sweden
Posts: 139
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Diesel-RIB

Originally Posted by DonziJapan
Just how fast is every one looking to go on diesel?
My boat makes 60 knots with standard VolvoPenta D6-350/DPR engines/drives.No gearbox. 100 l/h at 50 kn. (Maybe someone can translate to US-numbers). The boat is a 36 ft Ocke Mannerfelt design twinstep RIB. Weighs about 4800 kilos empty.
Attached Thumbnails Diesel High Performance package-Is there Demand?-16-nov-2007-618-1.jpg  
7075T6 is offline  
Old 11-22-2007, 12:20 PM
  #104  
Registered
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Newbury Park, CA
Posts: 1,495
Received 47 Likes on 30 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by carcrash
Fuel efficiency is lost however: the new Yanmar BMW engines have disappointing HP per GPH numbers to support the high RPM needed to avoid gearboxes: they give up about 30% in the efficiency department over long stroke diesels.
If that much fuel efficiency is lost, then you might as well go back to a gasoline engine.

BTW, Volvo uses a blower on a few of their engine models that engages as low rpm, to get back some of the low speed torque.

Michael
Michael1 is offline  
Old 11-22-2007, 03:34 PM
  #105  
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
 
Steve 1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Beautiful Fort Lauderdale www.cheetahcat.com
Posts: 10,833
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Michael1
If that much fuel efficiency is lost, then you might as well go back to a gasoline engine.

BTW, Volvo uses a blower on a few of their engine models that engages as low rpm, to get back some of the low speed torque.

Michael
I ran that package in a 12-meter (cat) patrol boat but the military was very nervous about the drives so no sale.

We also tested the Yamaha 420 HP diesel (20,000 Hour) on surface drives that was a decent running package but the engine weight quickly overcame any advantages to be had from switching over from the Sabre that was being used.

I had a 10 Meter catamaran gunboat in the works a single engine (Italian diesel) 65 MPH @ 6+ MPG but the Oil price back then dropped to $10.00 a Barrel so it was shelved.

Last edited by Steve 1; 11-22-2007 at 03:36 PM.
Steve 1 is offline  
Old 11-22-2007, 04:46 PM
  #106  
Banned
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: st. louis,mo.
Posts: 1,647
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

We have secured our Manufacturer for the twin diesel powerplants, and will be one of the sponsors for the project, a multi speed transmission that has had great success will be used and a proven simple trimmable,steerable surface drive completes the package, will post when we are complete and tested.
Buddy OO is offline  
Old 11-22-2007, 07:34 PM
  #107  
Registered
 
Mirage 36's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Millsboro, DE
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by DonziJapan
Just how fast is every one looking to go on diesel?
I don't race so most of my time on the water is at cruise speed and not at top end.
I'd be happy cruising at 50 getting 6 mpg...or even 3 mpg. That's better than 1 mpg @ 40 now.
Mirage 36 is offline  
Old 11-22-2007, 08:17 PM
  #108  
Registered
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Steve 1
a single engine (Italian diesel) 65 MPH @ 6+ MPG.
More details please
Dawg Gone is offline  
Old 11-22-2007, 09:13 PM
  #109  
bob
Charter Member #40
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Cape Coral, FL
Posts: 1,253
Received 104 Likes on 51 Posts
Default

Give me a diesel making 875-900 #' at 2800-3000, a two speed tranny, low being like 1.3:1 and second being a overdrive of .7 to 8:1 going into a 1:1 outdrive overdrive running 33-34 pitch wheels and life would be pretty good.
bob is offline  
Old 11-22-2007, 09:42 PM
  #110  
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
 
Steve 1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Beautiful Fort Lauderdale www.cheetahcat.com
Posts: 10,833
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Dawg Gone
More details please
33 x 9.5-foot Cat based on my race hull with a single 6 cylinder 320 Hp diesel (1010 pounds ) on a surface drive, I had two versions of the open style deck one with an enclosed walk around pilot house the other a Centre consol.
Steve 1 is offline  


Quick Reply: Diesel High Performance package-Is there Demand?


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.