![]() |
Originally Posted by Sean H
(Post 2548654)
didn't say those pics were, but they do race in that when they race around england and norway... those were just some pics i had handy.
the race this weekend in ftl was 5-7's according to SBI, and the 32 ft outboard cats ran nearly as fast as the 40 ft supervees. |
Don't think many V's could hang with White Lightning in the Rough Stuff. Boat is Bad to the Bone. Try to tell 46 Skater owners they can't run in big water.
|
Originally Posted by Comanche3Six
(Post 2548659)
Post a couple pics, I love those crazy air shots.
|
It's called SBI Ft Lauderdale Air Show
|
Originally Posted by stainless
(Post 2548691)
There's an entire section on this weekends Ft. Lauderdale SBI race in the Gen Boat Discussion. That's what i was referring to earlier.
General Racing Discussion!!! LOL! Nice pics! |
A few more!
|
there's also one in the gen boat discussion w/ pics by jayboat.. has some nice close up's
|
No wonder I could not find it. It is two threads down! LOL! Beautiful shots!
|
Originally Posted by Sean H
(Post 2548630)
they have done it several times in Class 1.... they have cancelled practices before for 20 foot seas though.
|
|
Originally Posted by Brad Zastrow
(Post 2548181)
That video was the Chi town run! Just found the link. So you are saying that cats can not run fast like a big v in the rough. Seems like that big v was having a lot of problems in the rough. We were floating along for a nice ride with the front runners (cats). It gets old hearing how great V's are in the rough and cats can not run. Watch an offshore race.
|
Originally Posted by kgshooty
(Post 2548667)
Don't think many V's could hang with White Lightning in the Rough Stuff. Boat is Bad to the Bone. Try to tell 46 Skater owners they can't run in big water.
ITS A SKATER NATION !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! |
Originally Posted by T2x
(Post 2548402)
As I've said before the only reason that a 120 mph vee is safer than a 120 mph cat of equal length is because most "120 mph vees" ........do about 80.:p
T2x |
Originally Posted by DollaBill
(Post 2548768)
Those are some badazzzzz pics. Reminds me of the Poker Run in Ft. Laud a few years ago when the great pic of the OSO glad is standing up going out Port Everglades. I was behind him and could see the floor under his feet :) We broke stuff that day.
|
Originally Posted by bcschoe
(Post 2548854)
You broke stuff. By some miricle...By stuff survived without a scratch!:evilb:
BTW- game on for your Jersey school dates. I'll line up the northern crew. Steve's up here for the summer. We just DESTROYED Bethesda this weekend. I don't think they were ready for us hahaha. |
Cat insurance is hgigher because of the speed factor:cool-smiley-027:
|
I spoke to an insurance person regarding Cat insurance, and he said it is about three times higher than a V of the same speed. He said claims were more expensive for the cats because the accidents were more severe with more property damage and injuries.
I think anyone driving a cat who is interested in safely operating it, should have a healthy dose of respect for it. Those making blanket statements about cats being safer than V's probably don't have that respect. Michael |
1 Attachment(s)
Chicago 2007 - about 115.
|
Originally Posted by Brad Zastrow
(Post 2547678)
I have lost an engine at least three times at 140+ (35 Motion) Lost a transmission at same speeds twice (MTI). Lost a prop at 110 (MTI). Each time it was completely uneventful. First noticed because we are slowing down. I think the type of cat hull makes the difference. I have also blown at least 8 outboard engines on smaller twin cats 25-30' (Warlock & Motion) again no big deal. Blown at least 6 lower units on o/b cats again nothing but slowing down. So can not prove it by me.
|
You need to have alot respect for the water with a cat. I have seen people turn too sharp and hook them and throw everyone out of the boat. But, nothing rides smoother if driven correctly ! I wouldn't own anything else. :cool-smiley-027:
|
Originally Posted by PhantomChaos
(Post 2548625)
Nice!
That's gotta be a Prouty Vid .. :D |
Originally Posted by Michael1
(Post 2548943)
I spoke to an insurance person regarding Cat insurance, and he said it is about three times higher than a V of the same speed. He said claims were more expensive for the cats because the accidents were more severe with more property damage and injuries.
I think anyone driving a cat who is interested in safely operating it, should have a healthy dose of respect for it. Those making blanket statements about cats being safer than V's probably don't have that respect. Michael |
Originally Posted by Speedpro1
(Post 2548979)
You need to have alot respect for the water with a cat. I have seen people turn too sharp and hook them and throw everyone out of the boat.:cool-smiley-027:
And V's don't hook and throw everyone out of the boat if turned to sharply? :hitfan: |
Originally Posted by Michael1
(Post 2548943)
I spoke to an insurance person regarding Cat insurance, and he said it is about three times higher than a V of the same speed.
Michael T2x |
When you say cats can handle the rough stuff and I am talking above 3-4 footers, what length boat are you talking about? I have run with 36' and smaller cats and they tend to run slow in the rougher water and then blow by us in the calm. I have seen the 39' and above run very well in rough water. Would that be about the right size for a true rough water cat? What brands tend to run better in the rough? Different V hulls have better rough water characteristics based on brand. Cigs and Apaches seem to be the brand of choice for V's. My Fountain handles all that I am comfortable throwing at it. Seems to me size matters in V's or Cats when you talk about rough water.
|
Originally Posted by rbhudelson
(Post 2548971)
Chicago 2007 - about 115.
|
1 Attachment(s)
I had a fuse blow at 110 when I first got the Skater, thus killing the power to that side. It just settled down and came off plane. Here's me and Bruce Bullock trying to figure out which fuse it was.:D
|
Originally Posted by gerritm
(Post 2549155)
When you say cats can handle the rough stuff and I am talking above 3-4 footers, what length boat are you talking about? I have run with 36' and smaller cats and they tend to run slow in the rougher water and then blow by us in the calm. I have seen the 39' and above run very well in rough water. Would that be about the right size for a true rough water cat? What brands tend to run better in the rough? Different V hulls have better rough water characteristics based on brand. Cigs and Apaches seem to be the brand of choice for V's. My Fountain handles all that I am comfortable throwing at it. Seems to me size matters in V's or Cats when you talk about rough water.
|
Originally Posted by gerritm
(Post 2549155)
When you say cats can handle the rough stuff and I am talking above 3-4 footers, what length boat are you talking about? I have run with 36' and smaller cats and they tend to run slow in the rougher water and then blow by us in the calm. I have seen the 39' and above run very well in rough water. Would that be about the right size for a true rough water cat? What brands tend to run better in the rough? Different V hulls have better rough water characteristics based on brand. Cigs and Apaches seem to be the brand of choice for V's. My Fountain handles all that I am comfortable throwing at it. Seems to me size matters in V's or Cats when you talk about rough water.
A 30' Shadow/ Chris Cat would run with a 36' Cigarette in any conditions that were legal to race in, and I would imagine that a high deck 30 or 32 foot Skater would do the same. A 40' naturally aspirated, Skater got the best of a 46' triple supercharged engined, Apache in the Ocean city race mentioned earlier. ( a race in which the Coast Guard almost closed the inlet because it was so rough) So yes size does matter...in reverse...but , of course neither of these cat designs were from the Left Coast. T2x |
I've had a Chris Cat and agree with Rich about them; the Jag is even better in the rough. But, I'm not knocking Skaters: they are fantastic!
Due |
Just a couple of weeks ago I was on the water and saw a 24 utra deck boat cruising at about 20mph trying to keep the nose up so not to take on water over the bow. It was a calm day for the apache. Obviously a skater, MTI, and others wouldn't have that problem, but not everyone drives a big skater. SO what may be true for the bigger race boats may not be for these smaller lake boats. In the 24ft range I doubt there is any cat that can match a 24 pantera in the rough.
|
Originally Posted by TexomaPowerboater
(Post 2549482)
Just a couple of weeks ago I was on the water and saw a 24 utra deck boat cruising at about 20mph trying to keep the nose up so not to take on water over the bow. It was a calm day for the apache. Obviously a skater, MTI, and others wouldn't have that problem, but not everyone drives a big skater. SO what may be true for the bigger race boats may not be for these smaller lake boats. In the 24ft range I doubt there is any cat that can match a 24 pantera in the rough.
T2x |
Originally Posted by T2x
(Post 2549147)
So this "insurance person" is saying that a cat accident at 80 mph will have 3 times the damage than a vee accident at 80 mph? Unless the cat is made in some God awful place like California....that's horsefeathers. But it does raise a good point...There have been some terrible Cat designs that bow steer, or are tragically overpowered...or both....made in the land of fruits and nuts that might be the cause of a lot of this insurance issue. I wonder, if you broke down these accidents by manufacturer and length, would the data make more sense?
T2x I agree that it would be interesting to see the breakdown by manufacturer, but I doubt there is enough accident data to come up with anything statistically significant. The marine insurance companies appear to have lumped all cats together, and broken them out only by top speed. Michael |
Originally Posted by T2x
(Post 2549547)
While I agree there is no inboard cat worth a damn under about 28-30 feet in rough water...the twin outboard 24 Skaters will hold there own against the 24' Pantera, Magnum, Superboat, P&G,...etc... hulls with inboard or outboard power, and the record book proves this with multiple championships going to the Skaters over many years. IMHO there is not another cat hull of that size that would dare to tackle the water that the little Skater can run in.....
T2x Michael |
Originally Posted by Michael1
(Post 2549666)
It's still a cat, so how do they keep from slapping the bridge? While it might hold it's own, how do you keep from getting pounded to death?
Michael M Forget it.......T2x is still living back in the 80's!!! :D :D If he could....he'd have a mullet! :D |
Originally Posted by PhantomChaos
(Post 2549942)
M
Forget it.......T2x is still living back in the 80's!!! :D :D If he could....he'd have a mullet! :D |
Originally Posted by BLee
(Post 2549267)
I had a fuse blow at 110 when I first got the Skater, thus killing the power to that side. It just settled down and came off plane. Here's me and Bruce Bullock trying to figure out which fuse it was.:D
|
Originally Posted by Brad Zastrow
(Post 2548181)
It gets old hearing how great V's are in the rough and cats can not run. Watch an offshore race.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h6uNw...eature=related |
I'd rather do that endo in a cat than a Vee..
|
Originally Posted by Cash Bar
(Post 2549987)
I'd rather do that endo in a cat than a Vee..
That cat upset very easy. |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:38 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.