View Poll Results: Who Thinks Long Duck Dong should be Long Gone from OSO
Voters: 192. You may not vote on this poll
Long Duck Dong
#471
No my e-mail. That's ok becuase my e-mail is full of people sending me their screen name , etc to get on. I am super pizzed now. I can't believe the crap over there w/ a few slandering me and my boat co. I just hung up from cussing one of the azzholes out!
#472
Registered
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 534
Likes: 0
point is as i said it does not need to be all over the internet.
#473
Banned
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 12,849
Likes: 3
From: Frankfort,ill
Gentlemen,
for those of you that don't know, I am the Admin of Boatfreaks. I feel that I need to clear up a few misconceptions about what has been going on here with reference to our board.
1. To Prostock. I hope that you worded the above quoted post wrong, because BF's had NOTHING to do with your dealing with LDD. Is he a member and poster there? Yes. same as he is here. But Boatfreaks had nothing to do with this boat deal, good bad or otherwise.
2. To Laken. Believe me, LDD is not being "protected" on Boatfreaks. I requested that people not start a similiar thread on BF's to this one here that has more than 400 posts.
Why did I request that a thread on BF's not be started? The reason is, that I have been involved with this matter since before there was even a thread on OSO. Anthony (Nordic 95) and I have been in constant contact over the last week or so about this deal. I have also been in contact with LDD over the same time frame about this deal. In the beginning, it looked like there was a possibility of a settlement, which would have ended this before it began. We know now that did not happen. We are also aware now, that the lawyers are involved in this, and it is going to go forward from there. As I and just about everyone that has posted on this thread are NOT lawyers, none of us are qualified to make legal judgements on this deal.
As far as the moral issues involved, I've made my personal opinion clear to Anthony and LDD that I think the deal was wrong, and that the money should not have been kept.
With that being said, I would ask that you respect the members of Boatfreaks, and not start posts and threads there about this issue.
To make sure that our members are aware of this situation, I have done a thread on Boatfreaks referencing this with a link to this thread. That way they can read it if they wish to, and form theiir own opinions.
If anyone wishes to contact me on this, I can be PM'ed or emailed through Boatfreaks.
Thansk!
Zone 5
Adminstrator
www.boatfreaks.org
for those of you that don't know, I am the Admin of Boatfreaks. I feel that I need to clear up a few misconceptions about what has been going on here with reference to our board.
1. To Prostock. I hope that you worded the above quoted post wrong, because BF's had NOTHING to do with your dealing with LDD. Is he a member and poster there? Yes. same as he is here. But Boatfreaks had nothing to do with this boat deal, good bad or otherwise.
2. To Laken. Believe me, LDD is not being "protected" on Boatfreaks. I requested that people not start a similiar thread on BF's to this one here that has more than 400 posts.
Why did I request that a thread on BF's not be started? The reason is, that I have been involved with this matter since before there was even a thread on OSO. Anthony (Nordic 95) and I have been in constant contact over the last week or so about this deal. I have also been in contact with LDD over the same time frame about this deal. In the beginning, it looked like there was a possibility of a settlement, which would have ended this before it began. We know now that did not happen. We are also aware now, that the lawyers are involved in this, and it is going to go forward from there. As I and just about everyone that has posted on this thread are NOT lawyers, none of us are qualified to make legal judgements on this deal.
As far as the moral issues involved, I've made my personal opinion clear to Anthony and LDD that I think the deal was wrong, and that the money should not have been kept.
With that being said, I would ask that you respect the members of Boatfreaks, and not start posts and threads there about this issue.
To make sure that our members are aware of this situation, I have done a thread on Boatfreaks referencing this with a link to this thread. That way they can read it if they wish to, and form theiir own opinions.
If anyone wishes to contact me on this, I can be PM'ed or emailed through Boatfreaks.
Thansk!
Zone 5
Adminstrator
www.boatfreaks.org
#477
Registered

Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 3,045
Likes: 3
From: N. NJ, Eastern LI
Are you saying you decide what can and cannot be discussed on BF?
#478
Leave mikes280 alone I agree we dont need two sites saying the same thing about LDD,On the other hand Mike280 please stop bringing up BF,you are promoting and almost antagonizing people to go post over there.Consult with Zone,we have an agreement.Lets keep our sights on LDD.
Thank You
Anthony R.
Thank You
Anthony R.
#479
Registered
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 780
Likes: 0
From: Staten Island, NY
There should be no reason this isn't on every boating website.... It's only fair to protect potential buyers from being in the same situation, be it with the same party or elsewhere, people can learn from this.
And by the way compliments to this group
It's seems most of the people here are all on the same page!
And by the way compliments to this group
It's seems most of the people here are all on the same page!
#480
There should be no reason this isn't on every boating website.... It's only fair to protect potential buyers from being in the same situation, be it with the same party or elsewhere, people can learn from this.
And by the way compliments to this group
It's seems most of the people here are all on the same page!
And by the way compliments to this group
It's seems most of the people here are all on the same page!http://forums.boatfreaks.org//showthread.php?t=11930








