Whipple 600sci upgrade documentation
#121
Dustin came in on Sunday (the dude is a serious workaholic), and tweeked the PCM some more... still not finalized.
Stage IV dyno graph:
Chris
Stage IV dyno graph:
Chris
Last edited by CB-BLR; 12-13-2009 at 07:36 PM.
#122
Registered
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,777
Likes: 11
From: San Diego, California
Congratulations on those numbers, its a monster for sure!!
My question is the torque, it appears as though the engine is in boost even below 3500rpm!? Hope your drive and fuel wallet can sustain that kind of scenario.
Dustin is a motorhead like the rest of us, sunday is just a another day to a motorhead with a project!
Best Regards,
Ray @ Raylar
My question is the torque, it appears as though the engine is in boost even below 3500rpm!? Hope your drive and fuel wallet can sustain that kind of scenario.
Dustin is a motorhead like the rest of us, sunday is just a another day to a motorhead with a project!
Best Regards,
Ray @ Raylar
#125
if this chart were the final dyno results what would be your target rpms?....simply the highest HP? or do you add the torque and the HP together and go for the point in the rpm curve were the result of those two factors together is the highest?...I agree...awesome thread
#126
You typically prop for the peak of the horsepower curve, which is typically about 1200rpm to 1300rpm above the peak torque.
In this case, the valve train is the limiting factor, so rpm will be held to around 6k.
Chris
In this case, the valve train is the limiting factor, so rpm will be held to around 6k.
Chris
#128
This is with the 4.0L blower, Whipple cam, and a 4.0" pulley.
The Whipple cam is a little more agressive than the 700sci cam.
After we get this configuration ironed out, we will be bolting the 3.3L back on to test with this cam.
Chris
The Whipple cam is a little more agressive than the 700sci cam.
After we get this configuration ironed out, we will be bolting the 3.3L back on to test with this cam.
Chris



