Notices

PSI or Whipple?

Old 09-01-2011, 10:19 PM
  #21  
Registered
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: LaPorte IN.
Posts: 1,296
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by scoop123
I currently have PSI's. They take alot of HP to work. Does The whipple use as much HP to make the same boost?
How much boost are we talking?
WETTE VETTE is offline  
Old 09-02-2011, 12:34 AM
  #22  
Registered
 
PhantomChaos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Bell Canyon, CA
Posts: 12,754
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

pic
Attached Thumbnails PSI or Whipple?-dsc_8279-oso.jpg  
PhantomChaos is offline  
Old 09-02-2011, 09:26 AM
  #23  
VIP Member
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Tucson,Az.
Posts: 930
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Looks like Mike Bobbits [Risky Business] engines.
skater40 is offline  
Old 09-02-2011, 10:39 PM
  #24  
VIP Member
VIP Member
 
weldcrane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 555
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

check into the support you get with both companys!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! after the sale makes a difference
weldcrane is offline  
Old 09-03-2011, 07:22 AM
  #25  
Registered User
Platinum Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: S.E. PA.
Posts: 709
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

PSI all the way. Bob
EXCESS ENERGY is offline  
Old 09-03-2011, 10:16 AM
  #26  
Registered
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: SoCal
Posts: 2,228
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thumbs up Whipples

I love the low/profile look of the whipples, and they fit nicely under the hatches......PSI blowers are too big, and heavy looking for me... WHIPPLE for me..!!!
PokerRun388 is offline  
Old 09-03-2011, 03:02 PM
  #27  
Registered
 
Whipple Charged's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Fresno, CA, 93722, USA
Posts: 1,436
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Is there really a comparison? Here's the 10.5 and 12.0 liter SC. Light years ahead of anything out there.

Whipple Charged is offline  
Old 09-03-2011, 03:51 PM
  #28  
Registered
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 152
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Whipple Charged
Is there really a comparison? Here's the 10.5 and 12.0 liter SC. Light years ahead of anything out there.

Do u make the 10.5/12.0 ?? If not when ?? Looks good like the old 930 ? Almost.
388SLW is offline  
Old 09-03-2011, 06:25 PM
  #29  
Registered
 
Whipple Charged's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Fresno, CA, 93722, USA
Posts: 1,436
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 388SLW
Do u make the 10.5/12.0 ?? If not when ?? Looks good like the old 930 ? Almost.
Working on it now, debuiting at PRI Show. Older SC was a 9.8 or 980. Very different animal here.....
Whipple Charged is offline  
Old 09-03-2011, 08:42 PM
  #30  
Registered
 
WeaponX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: LOTO
Posts: 1,436
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Whipple Charged
Working on it now, debuiting at PRI Show. Older SC was a 9.8 or 980. Very different animal here.....
In the pic it looks like the rotors "screws" are cone shaped?? It would be one way to compress the air.

Last edited by WeaponX; 09-03-2011 at 08:50 PM.
WeaponX is offline  

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.