WTF is up with F2?
05-23-2002, 10:36 AM
#54
Registered
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 126
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by Boat Girl
Rico...Friends???
Rico...Friends???
Just Kidding. Regardless of what is said here, all of us respect what the other "says." We can be at each others throats on the site, but when we see each other or meet each other, we all seem to drop all of it and just enjoy the company of a fellow OSO member.
Todd
PS...why do girls always tell me, "We can be friends?"
05-23-2002, 10:44 AM
#57
Racer
Racer
You guys are all outta wack by the posted numbers, which are probably wrong to begin with. It's not like there is transponders in the boat like CART or NASCAR it is a person calling of a boat number as it goes by and writing it down, so it's not the most scientific thing. The other thing is that I've talked to a few of my friend that ran 2 different OB boats both of which said they ran near 95 NEVER 100 so those saying they were running over a hundred are full of sh***.
05-23-2002, 10:59 AM
#59
Registered
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 126
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by audacity
i'll tell you right now that if this marrige fails i'm go'n gay!!!
i'll tell you right now that if this marrige fails i'm go'n gay!!!
Hey Ryan...
I personally ran the S-33 "Power Broker," a 30' Motion with twin OBs at Lake X at 105. Obviously that is test speed, not under race conditions. But it is also on a three mile fresh-water lake.
Also at Lake X the 35' Motion SCLite #37 ran 108. Also at Lake X the 35' Motion SCLite OB #34 ran 108. So, It is absolutely conceiveable that the 105 on GPS is correct. Of course it is possible that I am full of Sh... Talk to Joey G. who ran the #34 before going to Pier 57, he will tell you that the unless it was rough and the boat was propped small, the Motions were capable of 100+ in a straight away all day long.
