CMI exhaust
#11
Registered
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,087
Likes: 0
From: Lake Dallas, TX
Definitely share your fix to the 525 header problem!!!
#12
Registered
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,186
Likes: 2
From: dallas tx.
#13
Registered

Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,798
Likes: 13
From: Florida
I don't have a "fix", just some things that will help based on discussions with a lot of people, and companies.
I will elaborate on this later, but to reduce problems at the 1/4" gap, have a good welder weld some beads between the flange and the other tube. 6-8 at each gap/tube. Basically you will thicken the "inner" tube. Less movement, less cracks, more mass, better heat distribution.
This will add "mass" to that area and make it stiffer/stronger.
Just need to be careful don't burn through the tube.
In short the idea is to connect the other tube to the flange also.
Connect the top of the headers with a bar at top of the header. Like a tie rod. This will reduce vibrations and side to side movement. The weakest point is at the smallest area and thinnest. THE GAP.
I will elaborate on this later, but to reduce problems at the 1/4" gap, have a good welder weld some beads between the flange and the other tube. 6-8 at each gap/tube. Basically you will thicken the "inner" tube. Less movement, less cracks, more mass, better heat distribution.
This will add "mass" to that area and make it stiffer/stronger.
Just need to be careful don't burn through the tube.
In short the idea is to connect the other tube to the flange also.
Connect the top of the headers with a bar at top of the header. Like a tie rod. This will reduce vibrations and side to side movement. The weakest point is at the smallest area and thinnest. THE GAP.
Last edited by PARADOX; 05-09-2011 at 08:44 AM. Reason: sp
#14
Well, it is what it is......I will just keep a real close eye on mine and hope for the best.
#15
Registered

Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,798
Likes: 13
From: Florida
Read it again. Newer style is NOT WELDED TO FLANGE = 1/4" +- gap.
I did not referenced what CMI said. Others did. CMI did NOT SAY they have ANY problems.
Last edited by PARADOX; 05-09-2011 at 08:42 AM.
#16
The procedure you described includes adding material to the area of the gap. The GAP is the weak point
So, the newer style is prone to cracking issues too.
#18
Registered
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,449
Likes: 0
From: Michigan
#19
Registered

Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,798
Likes: 13
From: Florida
Many CMI headers have problems. 496's, 500's ,525's, 600, 700. and even others. 525's are one of the most sold. Thus, most referenced.
#20
Registered
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 710
Likes: 1
From: Cincinnati, OH
I thought this "gap" is what CMI called their "cool collar" design that was supposed to be the best thing since sliced bread in the world of water cooled marine tube headers ... rendering those designs without it inferior and obsolete? The direct welded tubes like the old E-Top style are better, now? Are the one's with the "gap" cracking predominantly interally or externally at that junction from one tube to two tubes? I guess I'm confused now.
Last edited by bob_t; 05-09-2011 at 10:50 PM.





