Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > General Discussion > General Boating Discussion
Fountain 29Fever -Goods & Bads >

Fountain 29Fever -Goods & Bads

Notices
General Boating Discussion

Fountain 29Fever -Goods & Bads

Thread Tools
 
Old 07-31-2012 | 06:35 AM
  #91  
Registered
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 2,347
Likes: 4
From: Thousand Islands area
Default

come on children, lol. hey everybody has different wants and needs. Some boats are better than others in certain aspects. Really any of the boats being talked about are nice boats.

Fountain is a great boat yeah there is smaller gas tanks compared to others and smaller cockpits but its what you need and want. I dont ever use more than half a tank in an outing so even a 110 gallon tank is to much for me. Heres the thing with fountain compared to others, one you are getting the name, the Fountain hull is one of the better ones out here, your getting the name, its like Nike and AND ONE shoes, and ones are just as nice as Nike but still arent nikes. Overall for the money fountain is going to provide you the best ride, speed, goodies, for the money. Are there others that are better sure, but you are also going to pay double for some custom rig. But its all in what you want to spend and want. I bought into my 29 for less 30k its looks nice, it goes 70 when I want but rarely get over 55, and I have one. I could be into something thats more custom but probably would have spend 5 times that to get what I have now or something a little better.
soldier4402 is offline  
Reply
Old 07-31-2012 | 08:40 AM
  #92  
Registered
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 2,801
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by soldier4402
come on children, lol. hey everybody has different wants and needs. Some boats are better than others in certain aspects. Really any of the boats being talked about are nice boats.

Fountain is a great boat yeah there is smaller gas tanks compared to others and smaller cockpits but its what you need and want. I dont ever use more than half a tank in an outing so even a 110 gallon tank is to much for me. Heres the thing with fountain compared to others, one you are getting the name, the Fountain hull is one of the better ones out here, your getting the name, its like Nike and AND ONE shoes, and ones are just as nice as Nike but still arent nikes. Overall for the money fountain is going to provide you the best ride, speed, goodies, for the money. Are there others that are better sure, but you are also going to pay double for some custom rig. But its all in what you want to spend and want. I bought into my 29 for less 30k its looks nice, it goes 70 when I want but rarely get over 55, and I have one. I could be into something thats more custom but probably would have spend 5 times that to get what I have now or something a little better.
soldier- Not bagging on the brand, just the ups and downs of it,

I think the F troop makes a nice stable boat, and I dont remember hearing anyone getting hurt in one because of bad manners and thats a big deal.

Really just trying to respond to the posters original question without soft-balling it. I see there is a duplicate of this in the fountain forum - should be fun to watch.

UD
Uncle Dave is offline  
Reply
Old 07-31-2012 | 03:46 PM
  #93  
onesickpantera's Avatar
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,400
Likes: 25
From: Michigan
Default

Originally Posted by Uncle Dave
Posters looking for the good and the bad-(what the thread title says)

A boat in this size having as small as 110 gallon tank vs a potential 150 is a significant difference in an identically sized boat.

Last I checked a small tank was a downside and hence answered the posters question or at least brought the subject to the table.

Maybe not important to you- but who cares what you think?
You arent buying the boat.

UD
Never said it was or wasn't important. I just think it's funny that instead of asking r015 if tank size is important for his type of boating you use phrases like "blows chunks" and "that's a joke" followed buy "my boat...". That is all I was trying to say. If you can't see my point then i don't know what else to say.

I'm out.
onesickpantera is offline  
Reply
Old 08-05-2012 | 11:05 AM
  #94  
Registered
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 2,801
Likes: 1
Default

Come on...

This is the general Forum, not a protected (manufacturers) one.

This isnt knitting and sewing weekly.
A tiny bit of razzing over this kind of stuff is normal especially in an open forum.

No ones coming after anyones mom or sister, but since you seem to be offended I'll apologize to you an anyone else I may have PO'd with my colorful commentary.


UD
Uncle Dave is offline  
Reply
Old 08-09-2012 | 11:18 PM
  #95  
Steve Zuckerman's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 2,621
Likes: 1
From: Nashvegas, TN
Default

I am not a Fountain owner but I do have 2 good friends who have 29's. I like both of their boats.
Styling and graphics are a subjective thing. I've seen different people who's opinions are valid look at the same boat, and say the exact opposite about it. No doubt the beak will always be a source of "conversation", good and bad.
Both boats are blue motor singles, one has a lightly modified 575 and runs in the high 80s, the other has a 525 with a 3.3 Whipple that has been hard on drives (now fixed with a SCX), but the motor has run perfectly. It runs low 90s.
Both are newer model single step hulls.
Cockpit size: good
Sunlounge area: good
Cabin: small
Ride: average lake conditions OK, rough water, rough
High speed handling: good
Fit and finish: good
Build quality: good
Rigging: very good
There you have it. No bullsheet, no bench racing, just my informed opinion.
Thanks,
Steve

Last edited by Steve Zuckerman; 08-09-2012 at 11:30 PM.
Steve Zuckerman is offline  
Reply
Old 08-09-2012 | 11:41 PM
  #96  
Thread Starter
Registered
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 167
Likes: 1
From: Toledo, Ohio
Default 29 Fountain

Great review and non-bias opinion, pretty much my own thoughts on the whole thing, but not much other confirmation or views that matched, till now, and even some good examples confirmed.

Thanks
r015 is offline  
Reply
Old 08-10-2012 | 10:11 AM
  #97  
Steve Zuckerman's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 2,621
Likes: 1
From: Nashvegas, TN
Default

Originally Posted by r015
Great review and non-bias opinion, pretty much my own thoughts on the whole thing, but not much other confirmation or views that matched, till now, and even some good examples confirmed.

Thanks
All boats below 30' have compromises (cabin space/cockpit space/engine compartment accessability/storage/etc). I have one that is a pretty good compromise, as is the Fountain. I looked at both (and others) when I ended up with the Nordic. I would have been fine with the Fountain too.
Best Regards,
Steve
Steve Zuckerman is offline  
Reply
Old 08-10-2012 | 12:25 PM
  #98  
VP of the tickfaw200
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 2,126
Likes: 185
From: baton rouge, louisiana
Default

Something that nobody's mentioned is how low the stern of a 29' twin sits. The rub rail is literally in the water.[/QUOTE]

i have seen and hurd of a few 29-32's that have sank due to the sealent thay sused coming apart at the rubrail. just for that i woulnt buy one with BBC's. now twin Ls setup i would. the waight saving should bring the rub rail out. someting like that all alum 500ph/550tqr small block from marine power.
caseyh is offline  
Reply
Old 08-10-2012 | 02:11 PM
  #99  
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,053
Likes: 39
From: Further South East of Dome Island
Default

A 29 with a single sounds perfect.
Pismo10 is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.