|
Originally Posted by korvetkeith
(Post 4061093)
Isn't a 33 being built?
I think the 33 AT with 525 was 90 plus. |
yes I've seen it!
|
Plus...I don't think that there is a stripped down version of any AT. Built for ride. Built to last. Built for comfort. I'll take the AT any day.
|
can't seem to be able to post pictures of the 33...
|
Originally Posted by Pwraddr
(Post 4061096)
Yes, but is think with 565s. It'll be fast.
I think the 33 AT with 525 was 90 plus. |
Both very nice I guess the AT because it's cheaper!:confused:
|
Originally Posted by Greatguy66
(Post 4061139)
Both very nice I guess the AT because it's cheaper!:confused:
The AT offer the best ride best value on the market. |
I don't think IMO, there is even a question. The AT. You spend 90% of your time in the cockpit either relaxing or driving. 37 AT will ride better, and has more cockpit space. Plus it just looks nicer overall!
|
Originally Posted by Pwraddr
(Post 4061096)
Yes, but is think with 565s. It'll be fat.
I think the 33 AT with 525 was 90 plus. Edit: I mean cost of a new 33 AT |
93 with 525's. I bet 96-97 with 565's.
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:49 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.