Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > General Discussion > General Boating Discussion
Best spark plugs for the 575SCi? >

Best spark plugs for the 575SCi?

Notices
General Boating Discussion

Best spark plugs for the 575SCi?

Thread Tools
 
Old 08-20-2014 | 02:09 PM
  #11  
BUP
Banned
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 9,594
Likes: 46
From: Ft. Worth TX
Default

And if you are running overly rich - fuel - fuel fouling on the spark plugs like Ron said - MAP, coolant temp, TPS sensor(s), weak ignition components, ,fuel pressure regulator, and finally the injectors. Stuck open and or pulse width too wide could be any of these areas where the problem lies.. Totally agree with the cap and rotor and now a days the coil as well. Coils do not last like they use to, even when properly mounted.

Last edited by BUP; 08-20-2014 at 02:22 PM.
BUP is offline  
Reply
Old 08-20-2014 | 02:09 PM
  #12  
Registered
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 4,480
Likes: 43
From: Tennessee
Default

Originally Posted by BUP
Eddie Merc is still recommending R5673-8 thru out all 575 sci engine serial runs. Just wondering is plug fouling the issue as to why you are saying -7 instead of 8. Thank you for your time

Will post this as well we have seen a few bad plugs coming from NGK as of this year that have never been experiencing before. Not large amounts but one here and there.
You have to remember that Mercury has to make that engine completely idiot proof. When that engine leaves Merc, they have no idea what half wit, dumb ass is going to get it and put 87 octane in it and run it on the wood. They would rather see you foul a plug than melt it down and them have to pay for it. Now, if you follow their directions and use 91 octane or higher, you can easily run the 7's with much better results (in a stock engine, which the OP has). The same reason applies to why it runs so rich. They have to set it up to where it is pretty much as bullet proof as it can be. Unfortunately, that doesn't always yield the best results. In this case, the 7 is a better choice.
Eddie
Young Performance is offline  
Reply
Old 08-20-2014 | 02:17 PM
  #13  
BUP
Banned
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 9,594
Likes: 46
From: Ft. Worth TX
Default

Yes you are correct about the octane requirement but we know how people also look at saving costs at the pumps as well. OMC & Volvo marine engines use to recommend 89 octane and most did not followed that either, then you would get the guy in wondering why his motor is having issues with cylinder / piston problems, especially with the crappy gas today. Even E-0 is crappy at the pumps.
BUP is offline  
Reply
Old 08-20-2014 | 02:32 PM
  #14  
Registered
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 4,480
Likes: 43
From: Tennessee
Default

Originally Posted by BUP
Even E-0 is crappy at the pumps.
You got that right

One other thing to consider. A 500 efi runs 6's. It makes 470 hp at the prop. A 575 makes 525 at the prop. Does going up 50 hp, on basically the same long block, warrant using 2 heat ranges colder? I realize that they have different cams, but the 575 also have 1.25:1 less compression than the 500.
Eddie
Young Performance is offline  
Reply
Old 08-20-2014 | 02:55 PM
  #15  
1 MAIDEN AMERICA's Avatar
Registered
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,026
Likes: 16
From: Renton, Wa
Default

All this talk makes me think I should change my wires. They're stock from 2002 with over 400 hours on them. Stock coils and program too. I've changed the cap/rotor/plugs 3 times and just use the stock stuff/gap. Boat still runs the same MPH as when the engines were redone 200 hours ago. It does feel crisper when I put new plugs in. I've had 2 injectors go wide open above idle but only noticed that because of the difference in fuel consumption from L to R engine, er, I mean S to P.
Sounds like a winter project. Woohoo, 110 here I come.
1 MAIDEN AMERICA is offline  
Reply
Old 08-20-2014 | 03:18 PM
  #16  
BUP
Banned
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 9,594
Likes: 46
From: Ft. Worth TX
Default

Most already know this, supercharge engine = lower compression ratio and you are comparing Throttle body injection to multi port injection. TBI in a 2000's engine. A little behind in the tech area on that one.

Also forgot the 575 SCi has IAT (intake air temp) sensor that also can cause rich running conditions / spark plug fouling related problems.

Last edited by BUP; 08-20-2014 at 03:27 PM.
BUP is offline  
Reply
Old 08-20-2014 | 03:25 PM
  #17  
Registered
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,648
Likes: 32
From: Oneida Lake NY
Default

Originally Posted by 1 MAIDEN AMERICA
All this talk makes me think I should change my wires. They're stock from 2002 with over 400 hours on them. Stock coils and program too. I've changed the cap/rotor/plugs 3 times and just use the stock stuff/gap. Boat still runs the same MPH as when the engines were redone 200 hours ago. It does feel crisper when I put new plugs in. I've had 2 injectors go wide open above idle but only noticed that because of the difference in fuel consumption from L to R engine, er, I mean S to P.
Sounds like a winter project. Woohoo, 110 here I come.

Whoa....tell me more about the injector dumping off idle, I am having a similar problem (I think) on starboard right now
4bus is offline  
Reply
Old 08-20-2014 | 03:26 PM
  #18  
Registered
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,648
Likes: 32
From: Oneida Lake NY
Default

Originally Posted by BUP
Most already know this, supercharge engine = lower compression ratio and you are comparing Throttle body injection to multi port injection. TBI in a 2000's engine. A little behind in the tech area on that one.

Also forgot the 575 SCi has IAT (intake air temp) sensor that also can cause rich running conditions / spark plug fouling related problems.
Maybe, but the bpw vs IAT enrichment table is so tiny on the ecu mapping I doubt anyone would notice
4bus is offline  
Reply
Old 08-20-2014 | 03:32 PM
  #19  
Registered
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,648
Likes: 32
From: Oneida Lake NY
Default

Originally Posted by Young Performance
I've had much better luck with the 7's since those engines are so rich. As long as you are running the recommended 91 octane or better, you will have no issue at all with the 7's. It will run cleaner and is less likely to foul plugs at idle with the colder plugs. Now this only holds true for stock engines. In 4Bus's instance, he's changed pulleys (I believe), so it all depends on the boost he is running as to which plugs I would run.

As Mark (MER) mentioned, you may be in need of an ignition system tune up. If the plug wires are more than 3-4 yrs old, change them out. Same for the cap and rotor.
Eddie
3.25 8lbs pulleys, full roller conversion, mls gaskets, arp studs, 120 stats, adjustable fuel regulators, and I tuned it using afr and mefi burn.

My stock afr numbers used to get in the low 9s under boost if I left it there. When my engine guy tore them down he suggested that I clean them up because he was seeing dangerous fuel wash. My oil was always black at 20hr oil change intervals stock, now it looks so clean at 20 hrs I want to out it in something else

I agree merc was trying to be super safe with this engine, and maybe even for the xr drive. The flat tappet cam was a joke in a gen 6 engine, very restrictive. Stock I would hold it wot for 30 miles and wouldn't even get a rise in oil or water temp. So much life to be found in these engines, and merc really missed with ecu tune IMO. So safe it was nearly unsafe :/
4bus is offline  
Reply
Old 08-20-2014 | 03:39 PM
  #20  
Registered
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,357
Likes: 2
From: San Diego
Default

Mine has Ngk Y R5's with s pretty big gap. I am running msd's and chillers. I would hate to see the heat in 4bus motor w o the chillers. But mine never fouled a plug. My buddy said they are too much though. I am just worried about un burnt fuel. Arizona Speed set mine up.
mcprodesign is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.