Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > General Discussion > General Boating Discussion
From Cat to Console, a Nor-Tech CC is in my Future >

From Cat to Console, a Nor-Tech CC is in my Future

Notices
General Boating Discussion

From Cat to Console, a Nor-Tech CC is in my Future

Thread Tools
 
Old 03-03-2015 | 09:18 PM
  #261  
Thread Starter
Registered
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 2,975
Likes: 12
From: Charlotte, NC
Default

Originally Posted by bill63
Looks great and that change order is the right order !!! Those pixs are getting me excited to build another.
After an unbearable beating from my fellow OSO'rs I succummed to the pressure & upgraded to Triple 350's. My decision was strictly based on future resale value & not wanting to hear "I love everything about your boat BUT I wish it had 350's"

Thanks to all that challenged me to rethink this before it was too late.

Bill- If you ordered a new 39' what would you do differently beyond power options? Would you wait for the new larger CC?
NASCAT is offline  
Reply
Old 03-03-2015 | 09:21 PM
  #262  
Thread Starter
Registered
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 2,975
Likes: 12
From: Charlotte, NC
Default

Originally Posted by fastdonzi
"Change Order" The new name ??
More like.............

"Slightly Over Budget" or "Owen Lotsa $$$"

If you look at the close up helm pic in post #241 you'll see the triple push button start switches to the right of the steering column. Keys are hidden inside cabin but won't really be necessary. Once the keys are all on then the battery switch alone will allow me to control the power using the helm push start stop buttons. Basically I wanted to avoid having 3 separate keys on the dash all w/ floaties & tywrapped together. I'd like to believe there's a better solution that provides a much tidier look.

Sportboats insists I should only need 1 Mercury TDS Key to control all 3 engines & that it still could be hidden but Nor-Tech insisted on 3 keys. I think it's redundant but I just got done saying the folks at Nor-tech are smarter than I so I'm not going to assume I'm smarter all of a sudden. Ultimately I ended up w/ the cleaner look.

https://www.mercurymarine.com/en/us/...nt-system-tds/

Last edited by NASCAT; 03-03-2015 at 09:36 PM.
NASCAT is offline  
Reply
Old 03-03-2015 | 09:43 PM
  #263  
Thread Starter
Registered
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 2,975
Likes: 12
From: Charlotte, NC
Default

Originally Posted by Double Rigged
The center engine follows one or the others depending on how you are manuvering. They do not use 3 levers anymore unless you request livorsi or aftermarket shifters.
The keys on the inside are probably because they use start/stop switches on the dash.
More security and it hides the large ugly keys.
YEAH what Ron Said!

My understanding is that the new Merc Sport Controls can be configured thru the Vessel View.

Standard set up will be both sticks fwd all 3 engines fwd
both sticks rev all 3 engines rev
one stick fwd & 1 stick rev kills ctr engine & allows you to rotate using 2 outer engines.

My question is, say you lose an outer engine if you split the sticks & it kills the ctr engine in essence you'd only have one engine under these circumstances but I'm told if you encounter an engine issue what the sticks control can be reconfigured thru the vessel view. This is probably something worth learning so as to be able to overcome the default setup if needed.

Keep in mind the std Merc DTS Controls normally used with O/B applications only have 2 sticks & can control up to 5 engines just 2 sticks that combine fwd/rev & throttle input.
Attached Thumbnails From Cat to Console, a Nor-Tech CC is in my Future-multi-engine-controls_png__475x600_q85_autocrop_replace_alpha-fff_size_canvas_subsampling-2_ups.jpg   From Cat to Console, a Nor-Tech CC is in my Future-img_2874.jpg  

Last edited by NASCAT; 03-04-2015 at 06:01 AM.
NASCAT is offline  
Reply
Old 03-03-2015 | 11:11 PM
  #264  
Registered
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 198
Likes: 1
From: Swamps of Jersey
Default

Originally Posted by NASCAT
YEAH what Ron Said!

My understanding is that the new Merc Sport Controls can be configured thru the Vessel View.

Standard set up will be both sticks fwd all 3 engines fwd
both sticks rev all 3 engines rev
one stick fwd & 1 stick rev kills ctr engine & allows you to rotate using 2 outer engines.

My question was say you lose an outer engine if you split the sticks & it kills the ctr engine in essence you'd only have one engine under these circumstances but I'm told if you encounter an engine issue what the sticks control can be reconfigured thru the vessel view. This is probably something worth learning so as to be able to overcome the default setup if needed.
Just spitballing here, as I'm familiar with another's triple control system's logic and was wondering if it applied here.
In the situation of losing an outer engine, the center would indeed default to Neutral as it still thinks its a "Slave".....until both the ignition on the "lost" wing engine and the center is shutoff...and then the center restarted.
At this point, the center becomes a "Master" and would take its control from the offline wing engine's control. I was curious if Merc did this as well.

Boat is looking great, Man...thanks for the updates.
High Cetane is offline  
Reply
Old 03-04-2015 | 07:20 AM
  #265  
bill63's Avatar
Fast Priorty II Nor-Tech
20 Year Member
Platinum Member
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,174
Likes: 5
From: Grosse Ile,Mi Kalkaska,Mi Ft Myers Beach,Fla
Default

Originally Posted by NASCAT
After an unbearable beating from my fellow OSO'rs I succummed to the pressure & upgraded to Triple 350's. My decision was strictly based on future resale value & not wanting to hear "I love everything about your boat BUT I wish it had 350's"

Thanks to all that challenged me to rethink this before it was too late.

Bill-t If you ordered a new 39' what would you do differently beyond power options? Would you wait for the new larger CC?
I would only change minor things, I travel with my boat betweeen Mich and Fla so a bigger CC with wider beam would be trouble. With the 10 ft beam on the 34/39 we sneek up and down I 75 without permits any wider and I think we would have troubles.
bill63 is offline  
Reply
Old 03-04-2015 | 07:29 AM
  #266  
Knot 4 Me's Avatar
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 8,407
Likes: 797
From: Central IL
Default

This thing is going to be a hot rod with trip 350's. Nice upgrade!
Knot 4 Me is offline  
Reply
Old 03-04-2015 | 12:06 PM
  #267  
Registered
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 1,090
Likes: 7
From: Ontario, Canada
Default

I'm interested in the thoughts of the OSO members on this thread on the performance of CC boats;
why is a vhull CC typically slower than an equal length performance v?
what are your thoughts on the improvement that an extra engine provides versus the drag/cost/etc...
What are your thoughts on the various hulls and their performance? some folks on here can tell you the exact speed of a well set up vhull power combo and they are all pretty similar but there seems to be a wide range with CC performance?
What do you think of the 7 marine performance versus cost?
What are your thoughts on 3 557's doing 8 mph more than 4 verado 350's on the mti for 200k more?
stimleck is offline  
Reply
Old 03-04-2015 | 12:10 PM
  #268  
Registered
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
From: Manchester, MA
Default

what are you expecting for speed with trip 350s?
woodbr11 is offline  
Reply
Old 03-04-2015 | 12:11 PM
  #269  
Thread Starter
Registered
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 2,975
Likes: 12
From: Charlotte, NC
Default

Originally Posted by woodbr11
what are you expecting for speed with trip 350s?
I'm told low 80's based on a Nor-tech 340 w/ the previous Mercury Racing Triple 350's
NASCAT is offline  
Reply
Old 03-04-2015 | 12:23 PM
  #270  
Thread Starter
Registered
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 2,975
Likes: 12
From: Charlotte, NC
Default

Originally Posted by stimleck
I'm interested in the thoughts of the OSO members on this thread on the performance of CC boats;
why is a vhull CC typically slower than an equal length performance v?
what are your thoughts on the improvement that an extra engine provides versus the drag/cost/etc...
What are your thoughts on the various hulls and their performance? some folks on here can tell you the exact speed of a well set up vhull power combo and they are all pretty similar but there seems to be a wide range with CC performance?
What do you think of the 7 marine performance versus cost?
What are your thoughts on 3 557's doing 8 mph more than 4 verado 350's on the mti for 200k more?
Stimleck- most of your questions are above my pay grade & knowledge base

A performance Vee is usually a 8' - 9' beam, most CC's 10' or wider
I'm not confident that any CC manufacturer builds their CC hull on KILL for speed when they need to have rough water capabilities especially if they offer a fish version.
My guess is overall boat weight will contribute to the boats performance so in addition to the build materials there's the equipment, live wells & pumps, the hard top vs T-Top, whats the top support made out of, how many rocket launchers, did you opt for a Gen or A/C?
IMO a pr of HIGH HP O/B's like the new Merc 400's will be more efficient & cost effective in comparison to triples but try to resell a twin engine performance or fish CC to anyone that boats in open water & I'm pretty sure they'll tell you they insist on triples.
Those that know a particular boat model hot setup probably have owned & or tested & tuned on more than one & over time, trial & error have gotten to where they are at. Doubtful anyone debuts a model, mounts big O/B power & achieves optimum speed & efficiency out of the box.

That's all I got, plenty of peeps smarter than I on the boards.

Ben Robertson would be a good resource to answer your questions but he's too busy trying to pay the bills to be surfing here.

Last edited by NASCAT; 03-04-2015 at 12:25 PM.
NASCAT is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.