Opening Statements Begin In Gratton Lawsuit Trial
#241
Registered
iTrader: (1)
Scott, This was brought up in the questioning of JC in the court.
His testimony was that he would deny the stopping of the race even if the Angels were asking him to do so. When asked if he would over rule the Angel's request as to stopping of the race, JC's response was, "YES"
His testimony was that he would deny the stopping of the race even if the Angels were asking him to do so. When asked if he would over rule the Angel's request as to stopping of the race, JC's response was, "YES"
#242
Registered
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Vero Beach FL
Posts: 196
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
scott, this was brought up in the questioning of jc in the court.
His testimony was that he would deny the stopping of the race even if the angels were asking him to do so. When asked if he would over rule the angel's request as to stopping of the race, jc's response was, "yes"
His testimony was that he would deny the stopping of the race even if the angels were asking him to do so. When asked if he would over rule the angel's request as to stopping of the race, jc's response was, "yes"
#243
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
Scott, This was brought up in the questioning of JC in the court.
His testimony was that he would deny the stopping of the race even if the Angels were asking him to do so. When asked if he would over rule the Angel's request as to stopping of the race, JC's response was, "YES"
His testimony was that he would deny the stopping of the race even if the Angels were asking him to do so. When asked if he would over rule the Angel's request as to stopping of the race, JC's response was, "YES"
#244
VIP Member
VIP Member
Scott
Thanks for all ur input I'm sure SBI will review all ur suggestions and act accordingly. Have you thought about possible composing a saftey and resue manual that the organizations could review for future saftey proceedures? That would be a win win to make saftey even better in coming yrs.
Thanks for all ur input I'm sure SBI will review all ur suggestions and act accordingly. Have you thought about possible composing a saftey and resue manual that the organizations could review for future saftey proceedures? That would be a win win to make saftey even better in coming yrs.
In my opinion, and I am NOT speaking for Mark; when Mark and Tommy barrel-rolled in Cocoa Beach, I think the race should have been stopped. I am certainly glad they were both ok, and looking back, had the race been stopped I don't know if that would have helped them more or not. However, what if one of them was more seriously hurt, and needed attention where time was of the essence?
It is VERY frustrating to think that an organization appears to be more concerned with profits from a race, than racer safety. I don't want to bash anyone; I just think that racer safety should be EVERYONE's number one priority.
__________________
Tug It Baby!!
Tug It Baby!!
#245
Registered
Nascar regroups the pack in running order after a caution and re-starts. Not only will it be no question safer, but it would also make for closer racing with a restart. How many of these offshore races end up with the pack spaced so far apart by the end of the event its a yawn fest.
#246
Registered
that one was the old dirty duck boat .lots of power went in it as well .started out with 525,s.
I don't know if that went to court or not .
I doubt it came up tho . seeing as how the settlement shut the door on any more evidence either direction.
Last edited by klaatutooyou; 01-23-2015 at 09:11 AM.
#247
VIP Member
VIP Member
There are plenty of accidents that I could mention, where I think stopping the race would be warranted. Frank and Mike's accident this past year in Key West, and also Mark and Kurt's accident were both very violent. Even though, in hind sight, everyone ended up being OK, I can't help but think that stopping the race so that all available medical/rescue personnel could assist would be worth the extra cost for a helicopter, ambulance, or whatever for that extended amount of time.
Again, I am not attacking anyONE. I think that all race organizations should put participant safety on the top of the priority list. I understand that stopping a race, having all the boats return to the milling circles, and restarting the race is not the ideal situation for the boat(s) that have a strong lead at the time of the stoppage. However, isn't someone's life worth more than all the 'prize money' one can win from an offshore boat race?
Again, I am not attacking anyONE. I think that all race organizations should put participant safety on the top of the priority list. I understand that stopping a race, having all the boats return to the milling circles, and restarting the race is not the ideal situation for the boat(s) that have a strong lead at the time of the stoppage. However, isn't someone's life worth more than all the 'prize money' one can win from an offshore boat race?
__________________
Tug It Baby!!
Tug It Baby!!
#248
Registered
There are plenty of accidents that I could mention, where I think stopping the race would be warranted. Frank and Mike's accident this past year in Key West, and also Mark and Kurt's accident were both very violent. Even though, in hind sight, everyone ended up being OK, I can't help but think that stopping the race so that all available medical/rescue personnel could assist would be worth the extra cost for a helicopter, ambulance, or whatever for that extended amount of time.
Again, I am not attacking anyONE. I think that all race organizations should put participant safety on the top of the priority list. I understand that stopping a race, having all the boats return to the milling circles, and restarting the race is not the ideal situation for the boat(s) that have a strong lead at the time of the stoppage. However, isn't someone's life worth more than all the 'prize money' one can win from an offshore boat race?
Again, I am not attacking anyONE. I think that all race organizations should put participant safety on the top of the priority list. I understand that stopping a race, having all the boats return to the milling circles, and restarting the race is not the ideal situation for the boat(s) that have a strong lead at the time of the stoppage. However, isn't someone's life worth more than all the 'prize money' one can win from an offshore boat race?
I think everyone agrees with more safety .
So lay out what you want as a group ,and present it to youre club.
beating up safety divers won't help any for sure .
At one time boxing had no gloves ,football had no helmets or gear .
so help make it evolve .
seems the best approach to me anyway.the blame game north and south can go on forever.
#249
Charter Member #94
Charter Member
Nascar regroups the pack in running order after a caution and re-starts. Not only will it be no question safer, but it would also make for closer racing with a restart. How many of these offshore races end up with the pack spaced so far apart by the end of the event its a yawn fest.
__________________
Abby-someone
Abby-someone
#250
Registered
Stopping a race procedure is complex, I understand, and there need to be a protocol when and who, whom has the final say so, etc. Personally, safety is should be FIRST. PERIOD. How to do it right? I have no answer. My last race was in the late 80's.
Just a suggestion. May be there should be a single body or org. by racers, sponsors, experts, manufacturers etc. and all racing orgs should follow the guidelines set up by independent board.
I would do something similar to PR's too.