Notices
General Boating Discussion

Merc 500R vs 520/XR

Thread Tools
 
Old 08-10-2023 | 06:48 AM
  #41  
Registered
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 7,327
Likes: 1,830
From: Merritt Island, FL
Default

Originally Posted by hogie roll
Youtube videos of haulover inlet boats are not all the norm. For every one of those boats there’s a hundred boats with twin 300s.

I could flip my 800hr motors for 20k and buy sub 100hr 2023s for 40k. Get that deal done and motors swapped in 3 days. Really getting hard to find someone down here that wants to crawl into a bilge.

I inquired about getting the 330 MPIs in my 330ss converted to closed cooling. The most reasonable $/hr shop down here that I use wanted $6k for the job.

A 496 might give you comparable hours and corrosion resistance as an outboard but those haven’t even been built in a decade?
When you say sub 100hr 300's for 40K are you talking the new V8's? Is that with controls?

I agree those to me seem the best bang for the buck when reliability is the goal. Hang a pair on a 30 spectra cat and that would be a cheap fun ride.
Wildman_grafix is offline  
Reply
Old 08-10-2023 | 08:49 AM
  #42  
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,869
Likes: 797
From: St. Pete Beach, FL
Default

Originally Posted by Wildman_grafix
When you say sub 100hr 300's for 40K are you talking the new V8's? Is that with controls?

I agree those to me seem the best bang for the buck when reliability is the goal. Hang a pair on a 30 spectra cat and that would be a cheap fun ride.
Suzuki 300s like I’m running now. I’ve noticed Merc 300 V8 prices coming down recently, but a full swap with new controls would be pricier obviously.

https://www.thehulltruth.com/parts-f...0-25-pair.html

https://www.thehulltruth.com/parts-f...is-2014-a.html
hogie roll is offline  
Reply
Old 08-10-2023 | 08:52 AM
  #43  
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,869
Likes: 797
From: St. Pete Beach, FL
Default

Originally Posted by Wildman_grafix
When you say sub 100hr 300's for 40K are you talking the new V8's? Is that with controls?

I agree those to me seem the best bang for the buck when reliability is the goal. Hang a pair on a 30 spectra cat and that would be a cheap fun ride.
The fatcat DW28 + 300Rs would have been the ticket but they must have sold the mold.
hogie roll is offline  
Reply
Old 08-10-2023 | 10:58 AM
  #44  
Thread Starter
Registered
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,134
Likes: 160
From: central IL
Default

Originally Posted by hogie roll

3x these gets you 3x318hp less than 90k. Weighs 1600lbs and turns 6400.

No way twin 520s last longer than this setup or cost you less to service. 520s slower too.
How many new sport boat Vees and cats are built with triple 300s though? When the 450Rs came out, the "old" Verado 400s in stock dropped to $40k new. Now that was great bang for your buck on a solid proven engine platform.
Plowtownmissile is offline  
Reply
Old 08-10-2023 | 11:28 AM
  #45  
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,869
Likes: 797
From: St. Pete Beach, FL
Default

Originally Posted by Plowtownmissile
How many new sport boat Vees and cats are built with triple 300s though? When the 450Rs came out, the "old" Verado 400s in stock dropped to $40k new. Now that was great bang for your buck on a solid proven engine platform.
Just saw a statement 35 powered this way. On a 350-400k boat the savings would be not insignificant. The SC motors are thirsty too.

They were a great deal there at the end. Boat mechanics like the serviceability and durability of the L6.

If you watch THT you’ll see guys flipping low hours L6 400s for the next couple years. Some guys just automatically repower every 2-3 years.

Last edited by hogie roll; 08-10-2023 at 11:30 AM.
hogie roll is offline  
Reply
Old 08-10-2023 | 02:42 PM
  #46  
Registered
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 7,327
Likes: 1,830
From: Merritt Island, FL
Default

Originally Posted by Plowtownmissile
Thank you for your post with the comparison. I was basing the price without ITS added and standard XR drive https://www.proboats.com/engines-for...California-US/
Personally if I was going to do that I would repower with these.

https://marineenginedepot.com/new-62...-airpac-620-hp
Wildman_grafix is offline  
Reply
Old 08-12-2023 | 02:20 PM
  #47  
Registered
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 70
Likes: 23
From: Liberty, MO
Default

ICDEDPPL--- For President, Sleepy wouldn't have a chance.....
stealthfever is offline  
Reply
Old 08-12-2023 | 03:35 PM
  #48  
fountain4play's Avatar
Platinum Member
15 Year Member
Platinum Member
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,460
Likes: 77
From: Omaha - LOTO
Default

Originally Posted by Knot 4 Me
I don't see folks stroking a check for a new quad or quint 450/500 CC as being new/gullible boaters. More times than not they have been there, done that with big blown inboard powered boats, are a bit longer in the teeth, and their boating priorities have changed. They know what they want.
While that may be true, for the most part they want to be part of the weenie-rub group. Never been a fan of the CC craze. They don't have anything to offer except a loud stereo and can haul a bunch of people and not worth a damn to cove out and swim.

Seems old school going back to egg beaters no matter what the hp. Especially since they've eclipsed the cost of a decent hp I/O motors. Cost for maintenance these will not be any cheaper in the long run.

fountain4play is offline  
Reply
Old 08-15-2023 | 12:12 PM
  #49  
Registered
 
Joined: Apr 2022
Posts: 53
Likes: 43
From: Lake Michigan to LOTO
Default

Originally Posted by Brad Christy
Hogie,

My point is that the majority of the selling points for quad OB CCs are outright myths, offered up to make an upsell. Again, there’s no way you’re going to convince me that maintaining 4-5 OB is easier or cheaper than a couple of big IBs, and the upfront cost leaves plenty of room for maintaining the IBs down the road. There’s also no way they are more efficient. At the end of the day, HP means fuel. Period.

Thanks. Brad.
To your point on efficency...in an apples to apples comparison of a twin engine boat, is 500 hp out of a 726 lb 500R not more efficient than 520 hp out of a 1218 lb 520 sterndrive?

Also, in regards to maintenance, I can assure you that I could change the oil, change the spark plugs and pencil coils, and even swap 4 starters faster on a quad Verado boat than you could do a tune-up on a side by side sterndrive boat. And I could do it from a step ladder.
Menage_Aqua is offline  
Reply
Old 08-15-2023 | 12:40 PM
  #50  
DRAG's Avatar
Platinum Member
10 Year Member
Platinum Member
 
Joined: Jul 2015
Posts: 482
Likes: 400
From: Danville, IN
Default

I don't have a good rational argument here as for the true fuel economy numbers, but I will tell you that a friend I run with has a 35 statement CC with 400s (non-R) on it and his fuel burn on those at WOT matches my more powerful big blocks. That's just reading GPH recorded off the dang Mercury software so not sure if its accurate, or even a viable argument. Our boats weigh similar, but his hull is wider and less efficient for sure. Its a real non-valid comparison. Still....we are both about 86 GPH at WOT.....and that's 400s. vs modern 540s. His boat does carry a lot more fuel, so on water weight is probably off by 1000 lb also

Something also to mention. 86mph and me getting it as hard as I can....86 GPH. Pull the sticks back just a tickle and run 80-81 and it drops 20 GPH fuel burn.
DRAG is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.