Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > Technical > General Q & A
598 vs  632 PROS CONS >

598 vs 632 PROS CONS

Notices

598 vs 632 PROS CONS

Thread Tools
 
Old 10-26-2008, 07:25 PM
  #11  
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
14 apache's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Northport N.Y.
Posts: 2,139
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by GPM
I don't know that much but 6.535 rod and a 4.75 crank, 1.37 rod to stroke ratio, might just eat rings. Just an opinion.
THANKS FOR YOUR INFO JUST KICKING THE THOUGHT BUYING NEW CRANKS ANYWAY.
14 apache is offline  
Old 10-26-2008, 08:03 PM
  #12  
GPM
Registered
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Pa
Posts: 2,663
Received 80 Likes on 58 Posts
Default

Put a couple of pounds of boost to your 598 have more power accross the board.
GPM is online now  
Old 10-27-2008, 01:45 AM
  #13  
Registered
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 4,480
Likes: 0
Received 40 Likes on 16 Posts
Default

Stick with the 598. I don't like the 632 just for the reason mentioned above.....rod angle. Probably 95% of the engines that I build are 598ci. Quite simply, they work.
If I understand correctly, you are making 890 hp NA? If you are, you must be turning them pretty hard. A 632 will not like sustained high rpm. Not to mention, that 3/4 stroke crank is heavier. It will be hard to make the rings, not to mention everything else, live at high rpms.
Eddie
Young Performance is offline  
Old 10-27-2008, 12:57 PM
  #14  
Geronimo36
Gold Member
 
Panther's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Elkton, MD
Posts: 11,972
Received 131 Likes on 36 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by GPM
4.6 bore 4.5 stroke
For some reason I thought it was the other way around but I guess there's a couple different ways to skin the cat.
Panther is offline  
Old 10-27-2008, 12:59 PM
  #15  
Geronimo36
Gold Member
 
Panther's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Elkton, MD
Posts: 11,972
Received 131 Likes on 36 Posts
Default

Eddie, on your 598's do you stick with the 6.535 rod or go to the 6.70?

My 580's have 6.70 rods. The pin is pretty far up into the oil ring and the pistons had to be custom but it seems to work out well, never any problems.
Panther is offline  
Old 10-27-2008, 01:32 PM
  #16  
Registered
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 4,480
Likes: 0
Received 40 Likes on 16 Posts
Default

It depends on the engine. In the NA engines I use a 6.700 rod with a 1.25 comp height piston.
In the SC engines, JE doesn't make an inverted dome piston in a 1.25, only 1.27. In that case I have to use a 6.635 rod. You could use a 6.700 rod and a piston with a 1.12 comp height, but I'm not crazy about the piston. I don't like to run anything less than 1.25.
I haven't had any troubles from a 1.25 piston or the 6.700 rod.
Eddie
Young Performance is offline  
Old 10-27-2008, 04:32 PM
  #17  
GPM
Registered
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Pa
Posts: 2,663
Received 80 Likes on 58 Posts
Default

Might try Wiseco, they made mine with a 43cc dish, for a 6.7 rod and the 4.5 crank, ch 1.24
GPM is online now  
Old 10-27-2008, 10:18 PM
  #18  
Registered
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 4,480
Likes: 0
Received 40 Likes on 16 Posts
Default

Thanks, but I look at it as the old saying goes....."if it ain't broke, don't fix it". I have had excellent results from the JE inverted dome pistons. I don't have anything against Wiseco, or anyone else for that matter, but what I have been doing has worked great for many, many years. I appreciate the heads up on the pistons. If I ever start having trouble with the JE's, I will certainly give them a look. Thanks, Eddie.
Young Performance is offline  
Old 10-27-2008, 10:24 PM
  #19  
GPM
Registered
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Pa
Posts: 2,663
Received 80 Likes on 58 Posts
Default

Stay with what works, I thought I heard Wiseco owns JE.
GPM is online now  
Old 10-27-2008, 11:06 PM
  #20  
Registered
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 4,480
Likes: 0
Received 40 Likes on 16 Posts
Default

I hadn't heard that, but that doesn't mean anything.

It may be true, I just don't know. The only Wiseco pistons I have used were on an outboard. I have not heard of anyone having problems with them.
Eddie
Young Performance is offline  


Quick Reply: 598 vs 632 PROS CONS


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.