Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > Technical > General Q & A
598 vs  632 PROS CONS >

598 vs 632 PROS CONS

Notices

598 vs 632 PROS CONS

Thread Tools
 
Old 10-26-2008, 05:58 PM
  #1  
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
14 apache's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Northport N.Y.
Posts: 2,139
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
Default 598 vs 632 PROS CONS

Have 598 now thinking about stroking 598 to 632 what do you guys think about doing this any cons. I know i need pistons and cranks. They make 890hp 6300rpm maybe a little lower rpm with 632. Thanks
14 apache is offline  
Old 10-26-2008, 06:41 PM
  #2  
Geronimo36
Gold Member
 
Panther's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Elkton, MD
Posts: 11,972
Received 131 Likes on 36 Posts
Default

How about some blowers on those 598's with a piston change? somewhere around 1100 hp?
Panther is offline  
Old 10-26-2008, 06:57 PM
  #3  
Registered
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Buffalo, NY
Posts: 282
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

What is the bore and stroke of the 598 and 632? Is the cylinder spacing different from a 540? Or is it just bored and stroked?
stormbauer is offline  
Old 10-26-2008, 06:57 PM
  #4  
GPM
Registered
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Pa
Posts: 2,662
Received 78 Likes on 56 Posts
Default

I wouldn't like the rod to stroke ratio if it's a 10.2 block.
GPM is offline  
Old 10-26-2008, 07:06 PM
  #5  
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
14 apache's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Northport N.Y.
Posts: 2,139
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by GPM
I wouldn't like the rod to stroke ratio if it's a 10.2 block.
10.2 BLOCK RODS 6.535 STROKE 598 4.5 632 4.75
14 apache is offline  
Old 10-26-2008, 07:09 PM
  #6  
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
14 apache's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Northport N.Y.
Posts: 2,139
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Panther
How about some blowers on those 598's with a piston change? somewhere around 1100 hp?
HOWS YOUR DRIVE FRANK. THE BOAT IS MORE IMPRESIVE NA INJECTED + BOAT WOULD BE A HAND FULL WITH 1100HP
14 apache is offline  
Old 10-26-2008, 07:14 PM
  #7  
Geronimo36
Gold Member
 
Panther's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Elkton, MD
Posts: 11,972
Received 131 Likes on 36 Posts
Default

The drive is TOASTED....

I shipped the busted up pieces last week so they could have a look-see... So far it sounds like they're willing to work with me on it so I'm happy for that.

I'd like to do something about my X Dimension....need some fire sale shortie lowers....
Panther is offline  
Old 10-26-2008, 07:20 PM
  #8  
Geronimo36
Gold Member
 
Panther's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Elkton, MD
Posts: 11,972
Received 131 Likes on 36 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 14 apache
10.2 BLOCK RODS 6.535 STROKE 598 4.5 632 4.75
I thought 598 was a 4.625 stroke?
Panther is offline  
Old 10-26-2008, 07:20 PM
  #9  
GPM
Registered
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Pa
Posts: 2,662
Received 78 Likes on 56 Posts
Default

I don't know that much but 6.535 rod and a 4.75 crank, 1.37 rod to stroke ratio, might just eat rings. Just an opinion.
GPM is offline  
Old 10-26-2008, 07:21 PM
  #10  
GPM
Registered
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Pa
Posts: 2,662
Received 78 Likes on 56 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Panther
I thought 598 was a 4.625 stroke?
4.6 bore 4.5 stroke
GPM is offline  


Quick Reply: 598 vs 632 PROS CONS


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.