Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > Technical > General Q & A
best nosecone for Bravo 1? >

best nosecone for Bravo 1?

Notices

best nosecone for Bravo 1?

Thread Tools
 
Old 02-19-2010 | 12:17 PM
  #11  
Thread Starter
Registered
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
From: somewhere between paso & LA
Default

thanks for the imput! the boat would do 96mph with the stock
502/whipple setup, so I'm sure I'll get past the 100mph mark
when I finish the new engine, just want to get as much as
possible out of it, just like everyone else here!
blownjet 468 is offline  
Reply
Old 02-21-2010 | 08:55 PM
  #12  
Registered
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 236
Likes: 0
From: Plover, WI
Default

I would hold off on the nose cone until you try out the new engine. Otherwise you will not know what either one are worth speed wise.
Sledge Hammer is offline  
Reply
Old 06-30-2019 | 08:57 PM
  #13  
Registered
5 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2019
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Sledge Hammer
When I had a 468 with about 500 HP in my Baja Hammer, I was running about 78. I put on an Eddie Marine nose cone and lost 4 MPH. Knocked it back off and the speed came right back. It looked cool when sitting on the trailer, but that was the only benefit it offered.
what prop were you running
2000hammerdown is offline  
Reply
Old 06-30-2019 | 10:44 PM
  #14  
Registered
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 4,189
Likes: 55
From: Cape coral, FL
Default

Originally Posted by 2000hammerdown
what prop were you running
he likely won’t answer. This is an almost 10 year old thread and he hasn’t been on in 5 years. Lol
Crude Intentions is offline  
Reply
Old 06-30-2019 | 11:12 PM
  #15  
Registered
5 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2019
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Default

I realized that after the fact. Haha
2000hammerdown is offline  
Reply
Old 07-01-2019 | 02:19 PM
  #16  
Registered
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,621
Likes: 402
From: Cheboygan, MI
Default

+2 on the Hydromotive. I've been running up to 90 and the nose cone definitely helped the handling. Didn't lose or gain on speed but the handling was worth it. You have to spend some time feathering it in so it's centered and it's blended in perfectly, any variance in the radius from the tip to the side will cause turbulence and slow you down. I created cardboard templates to measure to curvature so it would be even and accurate.
ThisIsLivin is offline  
Reply
Old 07-03-2019 | 11:31 AM
  #17  
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 1,340
Likes: 28
From: Harwich, MA
Default

Originally Posted by Sledge Hammer
I would hold off on the nose cone until you try out the new engine. Otherwise you will not know what either one are worth speed wise.
Absolutely!!
TomR is offline  
Reply
Old 07-03-2019 | 02:29 PM
  #18  
GPM
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,696
Likes: 93
From: Pa
Default

Ran one of these to almost 150, worked fine, Imco lower had less cavitation pulling out. https://www.cpperformance.com/p-1041...r-pick-up.aspx
GPM is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.