Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > Technical > General Q & A
best nosecone for Bravo 1? >

best nosecone for Bravo 1?

Notices

best nosecone for Bravo 1?

Thread Tools
 
Old 02-19-2010, 12:17 PM
  #11  
Registered
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: somewhere between paso & LA
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

thanks for the imput! the boat would do 96mph with the stock
502/whipple setup, so I'm sure I'll get past the 100mph mark
when I finish the new engine, just want to get as much as
possible out of it, just like everyone else here!
blownjet 468 is offline  
Old 02-21-2010, 08:55 PM
  #12  
Registered
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Plover, WI
Posts: 236
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I would hold off on the nose cone until you try out the new engine. Otherwise you will not know what either one are worth speed wise.
Sledge Hammer is offline  
Old 06-30-2019, 08:57 PM
  #13  
Registered
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Sledge Hammer
When I had a 468 with about 500 HP in my Baja Hammer, I was running about 78. I put on an Eddie Marine nose cone and lost 4 MPH. Knocked it back off and the speed came right back. It looked cool when sitting on the trailer, but that was the only benefit it offered.
what prop were you running
2000hammerdown is offline  
Old 06-30-2019, 10:44 PM
  #14  
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Cape coral, FL
Posts: 4,189
Received 55 Likes on 34 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 2000hammerdown
what prop were you running
he likely won’t answer. This is an almost 10 year old thread and he hasn’t been on in 5 years. Lol
Crude Intentions is offline  
Old 06-30-2019, 11:12 PM
  #15  
Registered
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I realized that after the fact. Haha
2000hammerdown is offline  
Old 07-01-2019, 02:19 PM
  #16  
Registered
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Cheboygan, MI
Posts: 1,621
Received 398 Likes on 229 Posts
Default

+2 on the Hydromotive. I've been running up to 90 and the nose cone definitely helped the handling. Didn't lose or gain on speed but the handling was worth it. You have to spend some time feathering it in so it's centered and it's blended in perfectly, any variance in the radius from the tip to the side will cause turbulence and slow you down. I created cardboard templates to measure to curvature so it would be even and accurate.
ThisIsLivin is offline  
Old 07-03-2019, 11:31 AM
  #17  
Registered
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Harwich, MA
Posts: 1,340
Received 28 Likes on 18 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Sledge Hammer
I would hold off on the nose cone until you try out the new engine. Otherwise you will not know what either one are worth speed wise.
Absolutely!!
TomR is offline  
Old 07-03-2019, 02:29 PM
  #18  
GPM
Registered
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Pa
Posts: 2,662
Received 78 Likes on 56 Posts
Default

Ran one of these to almost 150, worked fine, Imco lower had less cavitation pulling out. https://www.cpperformance.com/p-1041...r-pick-up.aspx
GPM is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.